[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

reply to post by InhaleExhale


You mixed 'in the coming days' and 'few days'. Reread the OP.

Double post.

reply to post by Chamberf=6


Sometimes the posts seem to approach word salad much more than other times . . . or is that the GENERAL evolutionary . . . regress . . . of the posts from that source?

It's still a bit mind boggling that someone could actually type such stuff . . .

AND

BELIEVE it.

CrastneyJPR
it's now 22nd - christening is tomorrow, 23rd.
is it worth me getting my sleeping bag, and camera and going to camp out near Kensington Palace?

and I've looked over the first few pages and you don't say that they'll return in a fortnight, but you say something like 'within a few days', and you also say 'on or shortly after' the christening.

so I guess we just wait and see - it'll be filmed by loads of different broadcasters, and probably streamed live somewhere, maybe shown live on British TV? I suggest people keep an eye on the footage, even if it's only so you can come on here afterwards to say that he hasn't been abducted yet.

I bet that once the first wave has occured and witnessed by few people, the second wave will be far more observed and filmed by MSM for the military won't endanger the return of the young royals.

CrastneyJPR
the 'few days' comment (in the original post - so not hard to find and look at) is about there being 'a few days' between the abduction (on or shortly after the christening) and their return back again.

it's not 'in a few days time' or 'a few days from now', or anything else to do with the time the OP was posted.

as I say, the OP is easy to go find and look at to clarify this misunderstanding of what he's written.
I know he's French and his English isn't perfect but this in not misunderstandable.

Yes very easy to find and look at, so lets have a look shall we

I predict multiple UFOs sightings in the coming days over the UK capital, London. This should come in two waves separated by very fews days. One for the departure of 3 figures. The other for their RETURN.

Now if you have read the thread Olivet was claiming that a UFO report last week was the beginning of his claims coming true.

The Royal baby and parents Will and Kate are still around are they not?

Or have they departed and already been returned because its been a few days?

Or was that UFO report a mistake on Olivets part and that was only a UFO report that could have anything and not ET, because OP was adamant it was ET, he said what else could it be when asked how he verified that one report of one person seeing something unidentified in the sky over London is extra terrestrial.

My mistake for using the date of the OP and not the date when this UFO report came into the picture.

So many other things which go against each other,

The size,

on page 2 Olivet posts that the UFOs will be much larger than a couple of points of light and that there will be no doubt

Much larger. No doubt will be permitted.

Then to go on and say that some wont see them because fractal time and the size will vary to the witnesses due to what ever the reasons he gave.

Olivet has added so many bits and pieces that do not match no matter how hard you try and put them together.

bottom of page two this clearly contradicts "no doubt will be permitted"

Well, since the UFOs are able to change their shape and their materiality (from invisible to fully material), it's difficult to know when they are just lights and when they are fully material at one point in the sky. In the considered case, they could be material at a very low altitude, and then could accelerate to become lights again when leaving the earth. According to the distance between the observers and the ships, some will see them as lights, other as material ships.

No doubt permitted, much larger than tiny dots in the sky to its difficult to know when they are just lights is like two opposite sides of a spectrum.

By material I take it to mean visible because he uses from invisible to fully material which is confusing,

Or by material does Olivet mean a solid object?

If some will see them as lights and others as material ships why did Olivet give a very direct clear answer to the question of "are these UFOs going to be vague little dots in the sky or much larger?".

I quoted what he answered at the top of page two and he said "much larger, no doubt will be permitted".


If you can understand please help me see where I am mistaken.

Olivet
reply to post by InhaleExhale

 

You mixed 'in the coming days' and 'few days'. Reread the OP.

see my post above

and no,

if you meant weeks you should of said weeks as its been weeks.


The few days part is also touched on in the post above

reply to post by Olivet


So you are still standing by your prediction I see.

I'm standing by my prediction of them being a No Show..Sorry.


Any new details unfolding?


tom

reply to post by Olivet

I bet that once the first wave has occured and witnessed by few people,

So the UFO sighting/report from a last week wasn't the first wave?


You were pretty sure it was ET if memory serves me well.


Did I miss a part of the thread where you stopped with that sighting being ET and now are saying it has yet to happen?

reply to post by Olivet


Still waiting
still laughing.LMFAOFOC

Olivet
reply to post by Vasa Croe

 

You shout victory before the finish line? Absolutely reckless.

Yor line nobody else.
LMFAO!

reply to post by Olivet

Think about what LEGITIMACY MATTERS means.

Well when I think of that phrase in relation to an explanation from you on what you say will happen, the claims seem badly damaged by your reputation.

I know that's not what you meant, but that was the first thing I thought of.

But I still don't see how an explanation would "endanger" the "Witnesses" or the "baby George-Jesus-Christ Returned with a fleet of spaceships"...

An explanation would harm such powerful figures????

Surely IF all you say comes true, legitimacy would not be an issue...

reply to post by InhaleExhale

You know the saying dead horse n all that.
Just leave it he's allready looked like a twit nmust enjoy it.

Olivet
reply to post by InhaleExhale

 

You mixed 'in the coming days' and 'few days'. Reread the OP.

I have read the OP numerous times and in doing so have read your mind.


Your original belief was 13th October something would happen. this is what was hidden in your mind whether you were conscious of it or not,


The date has passed and I believe you were not conscious of your own belief of that date so now your stuck in disbelief that each day is coming and going as the last did and are afraid of getting older without every really experiencing your youth.

If you like I can make wild claims as well such the one above (or is it) and argue them til my head turn blue as well.

Help me understand don't tell me reread your words because they are what I am misunderstanding obviously

reply to post by Olivet


Iv'e gone back to page 1.
I can't think of any 1 or any ones thread to be so far up
their own a'holes as yours.Nuff said you talk bo.....s
How this thread was even permited to go further than your
other bull is beyond me.

InhaleExhale

Olivet
reply to post by InhaleExhale

 

You mixed 'in the coming days' and 'few days'. Reread the OP.

I have read the OP numerous times and in doing so have read your mind.


Your original belief was 13th October something would happen. this is what was hidden in your mind whether you were conscious of it or not,


The date has passed and I believe you were not conscious of your own belief of that date so now your stuck in disbelief that each day is coming and going as the last did and are afraid of getting older without every really experiencing your youth.

If you like I can make wild claims as well such the one above (or is it) and argue them til my head turn blue as well.

Help me understand don't tell me reread your words because they are what I am misunderstanding obviously

Have you ever herd the saying DONT FEED THE DONKEY?
just sayin.

OK, guys, I just got intel from 'the other side'. They told me when 'it' would happen. What is 'it', you guys ask? 'It' is first contact. They told me 3 point on when it would happen:

1. It would happen on an ordinary day when nobody is celebrating anything or expecting anything big in particular.

2. There will be a red planet looming big in the sky at least a day or half a day before 'it' happens.

3. Many people around the world would start 'seeing things' and 'hearing voices in their head', as well as seeing visions of disasters happening on a global scale at least 2-3 days before 'it' happens.

They didn't told me when 'it' would happen based on dates, only that it would happen on any day within the 'next 9 days'......

Menedes567
OK, guys, I just got intel from 'the other side'. They told me when 'it' would happen. What is 'it', you guys ask? 'It' is first contact. They told me 3 point on when it would happen:

1. It would happen on an ordinary day when nobody is celebrating anything or expecting anything big in particular.

2. There will be a red planet looming big in the sky at least a day or half a day before 'it' happens.

3. Many people around the world would start 'seeing things' and 'hearing voices in their head', as well as seeing visions of disasters happening on a global scale at least 2-3 days before 'it' happens.

They didn't told me when 'it' would happen based on dates, only that it would happen on any day within the 'next 9 days'......

N then uget another prat like this.
So sad.

reply to post by Olivet


Back again.OK Il'e ASK THE Boss,funny as f............
second

reply to post by Olivet

Im sorry which curtain are you working behind ,because you talk utter nonsense,srry bull.
Are you on somekind of self awarenes because up untill now f all has happened.22/10/13
or are you some kind of frickin idiot?

reply to post by Menedes567


FFs whomis the other side.
I want your weed.