[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

all the rest is still to come!

So you still claim you and a fellow Frenchman are going to be transferred into different bodies and become major world players that everyone will acknowledge?
You still claim King Arthur is making a return as well?
You've been going on about William and Kate being the witnesses, but in last years thread you suggested you would be one and that there may be several others around the world.

So you still claim all that?

You still claim to introduce wonderful new technology to the world? Still?

So you claim all of last years thread is still going to happen (even though you've contradicted a lot of it with this years threads)?

Of course, I still claim all of this is still to come. Don't you understand English? THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION AT ALL! Just a misunderstanding from you.

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

And you are ignoring all the other questions I asked.

...and no, you just like calling me and others stupid.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

You have edited your post AFTER I replied to your first version of your post. I think I answered to the rest of your editing above.

reply to post by Olivet


So you and others will be "bonus witnesses"? Why just the focus on William and Kate This year?

Why no mention of King Arthur this year? Or any of the other big points you made last year?

You really think you will be a major player in the world after switching bodies on a spaceship???

But all these major things you leave out of this years threads?

If all these big events are also supposed to happen in addition to baby George-Jesus descending in a fleet of spaceships, why not mention them too??

ALL bull droppings.

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

And you are ignoring all the other questions I asked.

...and no, you just like calling me and others stupid.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

You have edited your post AFTER I replied to your first version of your post. I think I answered to the rest of your editing above.

Yes I added the second line. So?

The previous post had all of those questions you just didn't answer them.

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

...and no, you just like calling me and others stupid.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

I didn't call others stupid. I said it about you loving to make yourself stupid when you see fit. I am sorry not to have enough English vocabulary to define what I see.

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

...and no, you just like calling me and others stupid.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

I didn't call others stupid. I said it about you loving to make yourself stupid when you see fit. I am sorry not to have enough English vocabulary to define what I see.

Sure hope you don't communicate the alien message improperly...that could end in disaster for ALL of us....

This thread.....

reply to post by khimbar


And why would the aliens care so much about the new Royal Baby? There have been many more events with much more significance than this and they have not shown themselves in this fashion. In the scope of things the royals have nothing to do with Alien agendas. How about a little more fosuc on legit sightings, rather than all of this fluffy speculation.

Chamberf=6

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

And you are ignoring all the other questions I asked.

...and no, you just like calling me and others stupid.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

You have edited your post AFTER I replied to your first version of your post. I think I answered to the rest of your editing above.

Yes I added the second line. So?

Just answered to it.

reply to post by Olivet

You keep claiming you don't insult people but you do it constantly.

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

So you and others will be "bonus witnesses"? Why just the focus on William and Kate This year?

Why no mention of King Arthur this year? Or any of the other big points you made last year?

You really think you will be a major player in the world after switching bodies on a spaceship???

But all these major things you leave out of this years threads?

If all these big events are also supposed to happen in addition to baby George-Jesus descending in a fleet of spaceships, why not mention them too??

ALL bull droppings.

NO! You're telling me that you didn't understand? WOW, Chamberf=6. You impress me! Really!

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

You keep claiming you don't insult people but you do it constantly.

Is silly a better word than stupid? Or would you prefer me to call you brilliant as a sarcasm rather than something more straightful? This is how you behave that lead me to talk about you making yourself... (choose your word).

reply to post by Olivet

THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION AT ALL! Just a misunderstanding from you.

So clear it all up for us.

Tell us how all the wild claims from last year don't contradict anything you've said this year.

And maybe you could enlighten us as to why you've made no mention of all these other major events and claims from last year this time around?

I know, I know...you got the dates wrong.

Never mind everything else. It's just the dates.

heliophysical1
reply to post by khimbar

 

And why would the aliens care so much about the new Royal Baby? There have been many more events with much more significance than this and they have not shown themselves in this fashion. In the scope of things the royals have nothing to do with Alien agendas. How about a little more fosuc on legit sightings, rather than all of this fluffy speculation.

Reread the thread please.

reply to post by Olivet

The ETs ships materialize and dematerialize. When you don't see them, well...they are dematerialized.

Hmm....I'm keeping a note of all these possible "get out" clauses you keep slipping in

Olivet: "Yes the ships did show up just as I said!"

ATS: "But why did no one see them?"

Olivet; "They were there!....they just de materialised!"

reply to post by Argyll


Ah...the old de-materializing trick. Those tricky aliens...always fooling us.

Argyll
reply to post by Olivet

 

The ETs ships materialize and dematerialize. When you don't see them, well...they are dematerialized.

Hmm....I'm keeping a note of all these possible "get out" clauses you keep slipping in

Olivet: "Yes the ships did show up just as I said!"

ATS: "But why did no one see them?"

Olivet; "They were there!....they just de materialised!"

Now you have to wonder what the OP meant on page one when he said "No invisible spectrum here."
Does that cover dematerialization?
I think he'll be terribly disappointed come November 1. That is if he even believes any of this codswallop himself.

reply to post by Olivet

I am going to stay polite and will tell you that I was taking your point of view. It is potential FOR YOU!

Why do you ridicule yourself like this?

Well you staying polite is actually a contradiction, because for one to stay polite would mean at one time they were and from what I have seen that just isn't part of the program for you....politeness.

The same question could be asked of you also...

reply to post by Pauligirl

I think he'll be terribly disappointed come November 1. That is if he even believes any of this codswallop himself.

Well it didn't seem to bother him with his other defunct predictions before now.

The date will change but the message will stay the same.

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION AT ALL! Just a misunderstanding from you.

So clear it all up for us.

Tell us how all the wild claims from last year don't contradict anything you've said this year.

And maybe you could enlighten us as to why you've made no mention of all these other major events and claims from last year this time around?

I know, I know...you got the dates wrong.

Never mind everything else. It's just the dates.

edit on 10/21/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

You're mixing things again.

I was wrong about the date last year. But this mistake doesn't prevent my previous claims to be true too.

Now with these new questions, the date mistake is not the right answer.

The right answer has already been given in this thread: LEGITIMACY MATTERS!

Once you have connected the dots you can understand what is at stake.

THAT IS WHY I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

Believe me, many people will understand what I mean. The implications are so deep that I don't bother getting things straight for you. You'll live and survive with it.

heliophysical1
reply to post by khimbar

 

And why would the aliens care so much about the new Royal Baby? There have been many more events with much more significance than this and they have not shown themselves in this fashion. In the scope of things the royals have nothing to do with Alien agendas. How about a little more fosuc on legit sightings, rather than all of this fluffy speculation.

Hi heliophysical1,

I asked you above to reread the thread for this question has already been addressed here, and in the other thread.

Now, in a nutshell, God's promise (benevolent ETs) leads us to understand that Prince George is the Chosen One (Rev 11&12, Matthew 24, Act1).

Don't make conclusions before the announced events have occured.

FYI, I wrote books about ufology and science. I can say I know this field of research well enough. So, the cases you think about, I know them. But do you know the reasons of these cases?