It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pilot admits chemtrails and says they are a "necessary evil"........

page: 53
58
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 06:54 AM
link   

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 07:03 AM
link   

Alda1981
It's amazing how in EVERY SINGLE CHEMTRAIL thread the same people appear and start "debunking" it... with actually.. no real proof as well... makes one think...


edit on 18-11-2013 by Alda1981 because: (no reason given)



I'm working my backwards through the posts and I have to agree.

You have hit the nail on the head.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 07:03 AM
link   

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.


Ummm, where is 'your' sun located in the sky just after midday mrthumpy?



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 07:06 AM
link   

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.



What happen to you?

I would say war is why myself, potential large scale war. Who known’s, not me.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 07:07 AM
link   

OneFreeMan

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.


Ummm, where is 'your' sun located in the sky just after midday mrthumpy?


Where would those trails be to someone standing 100 miles to your south? Think about it.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 08:02 AM
link   

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.


Ummm, where is 'your' sun located in the sky just after midday mrthumpy?


Where would those trails be to someone standing 100 miles to your south? Think about it.



It is a localised effort. Their area is being sprayed also.
Is the midday sun in the northern sky for them? Think about it.

I see them right now laying trail after trail in front of the sun.
They are ruining what would otherwise have been a beautiful day,
necessary evil or not.
edit on 19-11-2013 by OneFreeMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 08:48 AM
link   

OneFreeMan

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

mrthumpy

OneFreeMan

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Stop being so self-centred, maybe they're blocking off the Northern sky for someone else.


Ummm, where is 'your' sun located in the sky just after midday mrthumpy?


Where would those trails be to someone standing 100 miles to your south? Think about it.



It is a localised effort. Their area is being sprayed also.
Is the midday sun in the northern sky for them? Think about it.

I see them right now laying trail after trail in front of the sun.
They are ruining what would otherwise have been a beautiful day,
necessary evil or not.
edit on 19-11-2013 by OneFreeMan because: (no reason given)


No the sun isn't in their northern sky but the trails you're seeing to your south would be. Therefore the trails are only blocking the sun from where you are not from where they are. Someone standing 100 miles to your north wouldn't see the trails at all.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 11:25 AM
link   
reply to post by OneFreeMan
 


This has got to be a wind up. Even despite everything else you've posted, I would say that you CAN NOT be so stupid as to type this as a serious idea.

Surely to god, you at least have the brains to understand why that cannot be?

If I am wrong, and you aren't actually mocking the board with deliberate silliness, I would like to sell you some vinegar.
edit on 19-11-2013 by waynos because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 12:23 PM
link   
reply to post by mrthumpy
 


I think the chemtrail conspiracy has been created by the flat earth society.

So many chemtrail believers have issues grasping the concept of perspective and use the blocking sun excuse they must not understand earth being a globe.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Aloysius the Gaul


What is disappointing is that you have to accuse me of being paid to point out the simple English grammar and you cannot allow that ALL the verifiable evidence shows you are wrong.



Not all jobs are paid...
Just saying.



No the verifiable evidence and even Al Gore thinks that GE is crazy, and only a last resort due to the unforeseen circumstances of messing with the natural weather cycles and atmospheric testing.
If there is no inherent risks then why the scientific debates on legislating and restricting the practice?

Call me stupid but even I can see the dangers in pumping a load of chemicals including Sulfur into the upper atmosphere.
You call it imagination, I call it cautious foresight. Something that many of the "well educated" and complacent scientists and politicians lack these days in their fight for fame, glory and a place in the history books.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:02 PM
link   

_BoneZ_

hoax:
1. An act intended to deceive or trick.
2. Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.



The official story for 911 is a HOAX, so is the official story for Sandy Hook, and so is pretty much every excuse for invading a country in the last 100 years. Global warming is a HOAX, scientists have been proven to be manipulating data. The "Federal" Reserve is a HOAX, its not federal and it has no reserves. The whole "Change" campaign of Obama was a HOAX, nothing has changed, its just got a lot worse. The whole proportional representation ideology of politics is a HOAX, they dont represent the people, they represent themselves and big business. Al Qaeda is a HOAX.
I could probably keep going for quite a while, but Im sure you already get the point.




Truth is important, so peoples' safety and privacy be damned?


That is a question for your own government being as they see fit to damn your safety and privacy.
Are you trying to get this thread relegated to the HOAX bin?
I can see a few more HOAX's that should make their way there first.
edit on 201311America/Chicago11pm11pmTue, 19 Nov 2013 13:03:05 -06001113 by OneManArmy because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:07 PM
link   

OneManArmy
Call me stupid but even I can see the dangers in pumping a load of chemicals including Sulfur into the upper atmosphere.


No, you're at one with science. Which IMO is why it'll probably never happen

ie:

www.bbc.co.uk...

www.sciencedaily.com...

www.sciencedaily.com...

See also:

www.climatecentral.org...

and:

environmentalresearchweb.org...



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:11 PM
link   

OneFreeMan
They chemtrails are back with a vengeance today. The sky is milky and thinly
clouded over already as deliberately laid trail spreads out to join
deliberately laid trail.

They are blocking off the sun as they are spraying predominantly
in the southern aspect of the sky.


Are they really? Nothing to do with perspective and the upper air routes in your region? Can you even name the upper air routes in you region? No doubt you will be telling the forum that the planes were unmarked with no windows, etc.



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:15 PM
link   

InhaleExhale
reply to post by mrthumpy
 


I think the chemtrail conspiracy has been created by the flat earth society.

So many chemtrail believers have issues grasping the concept of perspective and use the blocking sun excuse they must not understand earth being a globe.


Yet another poor attempt at ridicule.

You obviously dont realise that the flat earth idea(proposed by scientists, pmsl) went out of circulation a few hundred years ago.
So whose stupid?
You should show some more respect for people that might not have had such a vast educational experience. Its not their fault.
Whats your excuse?

Arent we all here to learn and to share knowledge with others? Or are you just a troll?



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:22 PM
link   

AndyMayhew

OneManArmy
Call me stupid but even I can see the dangers in pumping a load of chemicals including Sulfur into the upper atmosphere.


No, you're at one with science. Which IMO is why it'll probably never happen

ie:

www.bbc.co.uk...

www.sciencedaily.com...

www.sciencedaily.com...

See also:

www.climatecentral.org...

and:

environmentalresearchweb.org...


I truly hope you are correct, but its very much on the educational agenda and is actively being researched at Oxford University. Source



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by OneManArmy
 


You may be unaware that scientists actually understood the Earth was a globe at least a couple of thousand years ago.

What you have done there is swallow an urban legend as if it is fact, a bit like chemtrails



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   

waynos
reply to post by OneManArmy
 


You may be unaware that scientists actually understood the Earth was a globe at least a couple of thousand years ago.

What you have done there is swallow an urban legend as if it is fact, a bit like chemtrails


No, I merely quoted the "accepted" and "official" wisdom on the matter.

In my opinion, and its just an opinion, I think mankind has been on this planet much much longer than we are lead to believe, but then thats just opinion.
Why dont you present the evidence for your claim that we knew this for thousands of years? you could get a nobel prize.

EDIT: I would also like to add that I said the flat earth "urban legend" went out of circulation a few hundred years ago.
Because it was very much believed still then.
edit on 201311America/Chicago11pm11pmTue, 19 Nov 2013 14:28:51 -06001113 by OneManArmy because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   
reply to post by OneManArmy
 


You haven't retracted that yet I see. I'm not going to spend much time on this.

First Google hit searching "spherical earth".

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 02:30 PM
link   

DenyObfuscation
reply to post by OneManArmy
 


You haven't retracted that yet I see. I'm not going to spend much time on this.

First Google hit searching "spherical earth".

en.wikipedia.org...


A heartfelt thanks to you and all who continue to monitor this thread, we all obviously think this is a very important topic no matter what side of the debate we fall on. Thanks!



posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 02:31 PM
link   

DenyObfuscation
reply to post by OneManArmy
 


You haven't retracted that yet I see. I'm not going to spend much time on this.

First Google hit searching "spherical earth".

en.wikipedia.org...


OK, I just updated my response with regards to that.
And then I see this.
My claim was that it went out of circulation a couple hundred years ago, as the history books tell me that that is the case.
Do I believe the "official" history books?, of course not, history is written by the victors and politicians.
But as a reply to a debunker that uses the "official" line at every opportunity, I thought it an appropriate response.



new topics

top topics



 
58
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join