Lt. Col. Michael Aquino Admits To "UFO" Technology Cover-Up [Whistleblower Testimony]

maquino

Eidolon23
You can't stop war by shifting its practice to another platform.

Actually a premise of MW is that you can. Historically attempts to eliminate war through "peace" have failed...

Define peace, and elucidate those approaches and where they have failed, please.

The Magus
Men love war because it allows them to look serious. Because they imagine that it is the one thing that stops women laughing at them.

I call booldook. This is the perennial excuse: it's all for the ladies. It's not. If we're looking at Freudian motivations, it's for men to please/subjugate other men. The psychosexual sleeve of the book has a picture of a lily-pure maiden, but crack the pages? It's all jackboots, bullwhips and homoeroticism. I would cite the Band of Brothers, the Third Reich, and Rome for examples, but do I really need to?

And underneath that? Just an excuse to take something that doesn't belong to you. Convincing a victim population that it's in their best interest to acquiesce isn't my idea of peace.

As above, these are sadly all illusions in support of various vested interests. The moment you start teaching economics and politics in school, for example, indoctrination happens. The crush of population and migration has long since eclipsed the ideal of the small farmer, unless you want starvation on an even more terrible scale than it already is. Eliminate the oil industry and many others would be destroyed. Indeed almost every other.

More booldook. Educate the women, as in, give them access to the Sciences, and you see progress. As well as organic population control.

Small farming: anywhere it's been implemented (see South Africa, Central America, Detroit), it has worked out famously. No one has to starve, as long as they're willing to put three hours a day into their garden.

Eliminate the oil industry, and it will work so long as a whole slew of viable alternative industries enjoy funding.

Mr. Aquino, are you familiar with crowd-sourced funding?

The issue of US military spending is entangled with all of the above, and is critiqued right at the beginning of the book. Projected PW is extremely expensive. MW by comparison is cheap.

Which is all that will recommend it to your masters. And which I've already pointed out.

If you legalize illegal drugs, you just move the profits into the pockets of a different bunch of profiteers, like the tobacco and booze companies.

Or, you deprive those industries of revenue, which is why legalization is still blocked. And the poppy fields of Afghanistan are just too much of a honeypot, ne?

MW's just been published, and is still making the rounds through the government and populace. Nobody's tried it yet. If Barak called me up and said, "OK, smartass, you've got my go-ahead to try to fix Syria with this," I'd dust off my hat and do it. Might take me awhile to assemble all the gadgetry and smart people I'd need, but like Arnold said in Terminator 2 "No problemo."

Hope you're not holding your breath.

maquino

Eidolon23
Proud to be an American, arentcha? No, but seriously, what are you upholding, if not those truths we hold to be self-evident?

Yes, I am, but I don't just sit on my fat ass and wave the flag about it.

Didn't intend to troll, but:



For the record, I am a small farmer, and help my neighbors where I can with their small-scale agriculture (many of whom are recent immigrants). I don't drive a car. I pursue volunteer work through a few avenues. And I believe in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. For all.

Just saying.

John Locke (1632-1704) was responsible for the doctrine that all government should be limited in its powers and exists only by consent of the governed.

Er, what if that consent is forcibly manufactured? Does it still count?

Thanks for the basic philosophy lesson, but I'm good. As are, I'm sure, most of those following this thread.

Wouldnt life just be a lot easier for everyone by solving our big differences with scissors, paper, stone?

Or chess for the more discearning leader.

And starcraft 2 for the nerds.

reply to post by OneManArmy

Personally if you ask me, I think a big deal should be made out of all cases of child exploitation and abuse.

Absolutely

So many times the lid is almost blown off of this, but it always gets covered up, for one reason, it reaches into the highest echelons of the elite. The paedophile priests are nothing compared to those that make our laws and tell us how to live our lives.

Hmmm...I was raised catholic. Catholic priests absolutely tell you how to live your life and have direct access to children. I really fail to see your point here. The people that make our laws? Who are you talking about? And who is telling anyone how to live their life?

ZetaRediculian
reply to post by OneManArmy

 

Personally if you ask me, I think a big deal should be made out of all cases of child exploitation and abuse.

Absolutely

So many times the lid is almost blown off of this, but it always gets covered up, for one reason, it reaches into the highest echelons of the elite. The paedophile priests are nothing compared to those that make our laws and tell us how to live our lives.

Hmmm...I was raised catholic. Catholic priests absolutely tell you how to live your life and have direct access to children. I really fail to see your point here. The people that make our laws? Who are you talking about? And who is telling anyone how to live their life?

The people that make the laws and enforce the laws, there is a large percentage of "lawmakers" that participate in paedophilia. I meant that the catholic scandal is SMALL in comparison to what is going on in the state care homes. Not to mention the people that represent you in government that are paedophiles. not all of them, of course, but there is a few, and then there are those that cover for their crimes.

reply to post by ZetaRediculian


The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal

The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators nearly exposed the ring in 1990, but its unveiling had the potential to produce seismic political aftershocks.The legislators' efforts resulted in rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering corruption of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI, Secret Service, and Justice Department, effecting an immaculate cover-up of the trafficking network.

The publisher is donating 50% of the book’s proceeds to organizations that assist abused children.

One fundamental problem i see with all this good intention is the following. Correct me If I'm wrong however, as far as I know , in the last century Britain declaring war on Finland and nothing really happening anyway, is the only time 2 democracies have been in a state of war with each other? The first gulf war was one despot invading another despotic nation and threatening the oil supplies controlled by another despotic nation. The rest of the world was hoodwinked/cajoled into action not from altruism rather, pure self interest dressed up as righteous indignation.

it's a historical irony that, both Hitler and Napoleon made statements the the effect that. "Europe, unless united, is forever doomed to endless wasteful conflicts". Ostensibly both Hitler and napoleon sought European and by extension world peace and look where that landed us?

If your plan was to bare fruit sadly, I think we'd end up with something more akin to that episode of Star Trek where, the whole war is fought without collateral economic damage and people step into the disintegration chambers after each "virtual battle". The basis of all war is the coveting of another people's wealth and land and there's your elephant in the room when you, as an American, propose such concepts. For it to work means the USA dropping the whole idea of unbridled and unfettered capitalism in favour of something which, to any good tea party nut job, smacks of "socialism", as the basic tenet of any true peaceful coexistence is. "You can't just f*** your neighbour's life up, just to make a buck for yourself".

3D printing and then nano technology will change this world in such a way as for it to be totally and completely unrecognisable to the one we inhabit even now. It will in fact by default, force a form of socialism on the whole world, the only remaining conflict will be about who is allowed to live where and when. Even that, through nano terraforming, might well become a moot question. Some of us are already considering the consequences of out technological advancement maybe, a few of the "great minds" currently wasting their time discussing the contemporary equivalent of "How many angels can perch on a pin head", would be better served helping to work out how we smooth a path into this inevitable "new age"?

OneManArmy
The people that make the laws and enforce the laws, there is a large percentage of "lawmakers" that participate in paedophilia. I meant that the catholic scandal is SMALL in comparison to what is going on in the state care homes. Not to mention the people that represent you in government that are paedophiles. not all of them, of course, but there is a few, and then there are those that cover for their crimes.

edit on 20139America/Chicago09pm9pmMon, 30 Sep 2013 16:50:06 -05000913 by OneManArmy because: (no reason given)

I'm confused then. I thought we were talking about the photo posted earlier and it's relation to the satanic church cult thing. My question was, would the same scrutiny be given to someone who is a devout catholic? And there is no "SMALL" in comparison to some other group. With that logic, the satanic cult thing is probably much smaller then the catholic priest pedophile problem. The point I am making is that it's a problem period.

So if Mr Aquino was a catholic priest, there would be no issues?

FireMoon

3D printing and then nano technology will change this world in such a way as for it to be totally and completely unrecognisable to the one we inhabit even now. It will in fact by default, force a form of socialism on the whole world, the only remaining conflict will be about who is allowed to live where and when. Even that, through nano terraforming, might well become a moot question. Some of us are already considering the consequences of out technological advancement maybe, a few of the "great minds" currently wasting their time discussing the contemporary equivalent of "How many angels can perch on a pin head", would be better served helping to work out how we smooth a path into this inevitable "new age"?

edit on 30-9-2013 by FireMoon because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-9-2013 by FireMoon because: grammar

I remember back in the eighties I was big on science fiction and "tomorrows world", they envisioned 13 years ago for us to have robot slaves, cars that floated and domed environments on the moon.

What could happen and what will happen are 2 different things.
But yes I agree, we need to do something to stop us from killing each other, but there lies the elephant in the room. That being the variable called "us and our instinctive human nature", and its need for survival.
If the grass is greener on the other side, we tend to envy, which leads to conflict. You cannot deny the animal that the human being so obviously still is. In the grand scheme of things we are barely out of the caves, we havent even been able to keep up morally with the technologies we are creating now. We split the atom, we make the MOAB. We create universal free information for all, then we use it to see what our neighbours are doing and plot against them, because they might be plotting against us.
Its all about survival, preservation of ideology, pride, and greed and future "security". Those are the traits that need to be addressed before any intellectual/rational/logical ideology can be maintained.

ZetaRediculian

So if Mr Aquino was a catholic priest, there would be no issues?

EH? I dont understand the question.

What has Mr Aquino's religious stance/occupation got to do with anything I was talking about.
I wasnt even talking about Mr Aquino AT ALL.

OneManArmy

ZetaRediculian

So if Mr Aquino was a catholic priest, there would be no issues?

EH? I dont understand the question.

What has Mr Aquino's religious stance/occupation got to do with anything I was talking about.
I wasnt even talking about Mr Aquino AT ALL.

Never mind. We both made excellent points though.

ZetaRediculian

OneManArmy

ZetaRediculian

So if Mr Aquino was a catholic priest, there would be no issues?

EH? I dont understand the question.

What has Mr Aquino's religious stance/occupation got to do with anything I was talking about.
I wasnt even talking about Mr Aquino AT ALL.

Never mind. We both made excellent points though.

I think we will mark that up to a simple misunderstanding.

Eidolon23
I call booldook.

Well, Ms. E., it's my impression that you are just bound and determined to call anything and everything I say "booldook", no matter how carefully I attempt to respond and to overlook that big chip on your shoulder. So I decline further response to you and wish you every success in resolving your unhappinesses.

corsair00
The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful ...

No, the "Franklin affair" was just one more baseless "SRA" scam, exposed and discredited as such by a 1990 Grand Jury investigation:

GRAND JURY SAYS ABUSE STORIES WERE A "CAREFULLY CRAFTED HOAX".
Many Rumors Are Debunked In Report; Three Are Indicted
- by Robert Dorr and Gabriella Stern
World-Herald Staff Writers

Omaha World-Herald
Omaha, Nebraska
Wednesday, July 25, 1990, Edition 6, Page #1

A Douglas County grand jury Tuesday called the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union child sexual-abuse allegations a "carefully-crafted hoax".

The grand jury's report said the hoax was "scripted by a person or persons with considerable knowledge of the people and institutions of Omaha ..."

While not specifically saying who planned the hoax, the report was critical of some state officials and others who made or supported the child sexual-abuse accusations.

The grand jury said blame must fall on three young people who accused prominent Omahans of sexual misconduct. Two have recanted their original stories, and the third was indicted Tuesday on charges of lying to the grand jury.

The grand jury said "rumormongers" spread much gossip and misinformation.

It said "many in the community both spread and received the gossip" and named three people in particular - part-time Omahan and fired Boys Town employee Michael Casey, Kirsten Hallberg, and Bonnie Cosentino, who were active in the Concerned Parents group ...

This and the follow-up story are too extensive to reprint here, and I doubt that most readers care about these old scams anyway. If you'd like a .pdf of the two articles, just email me and I'll send it to you: [email protected]

reply to post by maquino


Ah, yes - 'a carefully crafted hoax'. I am quite familiar with that, but thanks for sharing. I now know where you stand on that story - and it tells me everything I need to understand it. It's quite the epic, convoluted tale.

Thanks for sharing so much information - it is very generous of you, and I for one appreciate it. I don't understand a lot of it, so I cannot personally call it booldock (sp).

While as previously I can't discuss my Space Intelligence work at USSPACECOM/NORAD, I have pointed out, from purely unclassified references & sources, that the laws of physics make interstellar travel and navigation near-impossible. It is not a question of speed, but rather of detection media distortion at translite velocities.

That would reduce realistic ETs to the solar system, and we know enough about it now to rule out H.G. Wells' Martians et al.

This is cold, hard science, and obviously it is no fun for all of us sci-fi freaks. I'm one too, certainly. I told Forry Ackerman that his Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine, along with Mad, was responsible for the general direction my adolescence took.

Anyway, my advice to mystery explorers generally has much to do with Occam's Razor. Start with the simplest possible and most practical theory & explanation, and ramp up only if there's an invalidation somewhere.

So do we know there are UFOs? Sure, people see them. Does that validate ET? No, it doesn't. So if these sightings are Earth-originated and unexplained, someone's creating them and not explaining them, right?

One explanation, as previously mentioned, is Black Program aircraft testing or operations. There have been several examples of this over the years involving aircraft which was later acknowledged and declassified, like the U2, SR-71, and Stealth. The Internet is a great place to go exploring for this.

Another area I would suggest to you has to do with aerial deception operations, e.g. the projection of images through holography and other means which are visible and/or audible, but aren't really there. Such projections don't have to be "ETish", though they can be; and they can be seeable in a fairly narrow range of vision or a wide field, such as the famous "Arizona lights". This also gives you all the size you want, such as "giant triangles", and makes appearance/disappearance, instant high speed, and instant directional changes a snap. You can rig up the projection mechanisms wherever's convenient or appropriate: ground, ships, aircraft, satellites.

As for "why", this takes you into the fascinating area of "deception operations" generally. Since we're talking about stuff in the air, let's start with my good buddies in the Air Force at the Air University. Once again this is all unclassified, but lots of people don't know about it because they don't know it's there to look for. "Hidden in plain sight."

reply to post by maquino


Very fascinating, indeed - thank you. I have heard a little bit about the holographic projections for PsyOps purposes in Jacques Vallee's "science-faction" novel 'FastWalker'. Jack Sarfatti wrote an intriguing article about FastWalker which describes 'the who's who in the world of the Occult' backdrop to the story - as well as some of the physics which could account for the "FastWalker" technology.

In the conspiracy theory world, I believe it is referred to as 'Project Bluebeam'. I did not know how involved it all was.

An excerpt from 'FastWalker':

maquino

corsair00
The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful ...

No, the "Franklin affair" was just one more baseless "SRA" scam, exposed and discredited as such by a 1990 Grand Jury investigation:

GRAND JURY SAYS ABUSE STORIES WERE A "CAREFULLY CRAFTED HOAX".
Many Rumors Are Debunked In Report; Three Are Indicted
- by Robert Dorr and Gabriella Stern
World-Herald Staff Writers

Omaha World-Herald
Omaha, Nebraska
Wednesday, July 25, 1990, Edition 6, Page #1

A Douglas County grand jury Tuesday called the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union child sexual-abuse allegations a "carefully-crafted hoax".

The grand jury's report said the hoax was "scripted by a person or persons with considerable knowledge of the people and institutions of Omaha ..."

While not specifically saying who planned the hoax, the report was critical of some state officials and others who made or supported the child sexual-abuse accusations.

The grand jury said blame must fall on three young people who accused prominent Omahans of sexual misconduct. Two have recanted their original stories, and the third was indicted Tuesday on charges of lying to the grand jury.

The grand jury said "rumormongers" spread much gossip and misinformation.

It said "many in the community both spread and received the gossip" and named three people in particular - part-time Omahan and fired Boys Town employee Michael Casey, Kirsten Hallberg, and Bonnie Cosentino, who were active in the Concerned Parents group ...

This and the follow-up story are too extensive to reprint here, and I doubt that most readers care about these old scams anyway. If you'd like a .pdf of the two articles, just email me and I'll send it to you: [email protected]

The allegations against Jimmy Saville were an unsubstantiated "theory" that was never followed up for decades, and was only partially uncovered once he was dead. Same can be said for Cyril Smith M.P.
Anyone would think that TPTB didnt have a coordinated team involved in covering up the dirt, the way you describe things. But the facts that have recently been coming to light show otherwise.
I know Im talking about UK affairs, but it doesnt really matter what country we talk about.
I have seen Paul Bonnacci's video testimony, I think calling it a fantasy is a fantasy itself.
I have seen one of the parents of the children abused in the McMartin preschool case speaking about she knows that her child WAS abused, and it had nothing to do with satanic cults, regardless of Ted Gundersons claims.
EDIT: Also kids dont pick up sexually transmitted diseases from fantasies.

And as for the claims against yourself, Im going to give you the benefit of the doubt.
You have vigorously defended yourself, and I accept that defense. There is not much worse than being labelled a paedophile, its a claim that sticks, its a disgusting charge to lay against anyone that is innocent.

But to be fair, when you "play" with satanists and found your own Temple based in theologies of a "prince of darkness", in a very fundamentalist christian country, is it any wonder that all manner of claims will be directed your way? Doesnt it come with the territory?

corsair00
I have heard a little bit about the holographic projections for PsyOps purposes in Jacques Vallee's ...

I first heard of JV in the mid-60s when he was another friend of Anton LaVey's. Struck me as a mystic and a dreamer who wrote essentially lightweight fantasy stuff, which was fine but not my thing; so I haven't paid any attention to him since then. Fastwalker sounds like a fun story; I enjoy the technique of mixing fact & fiction in a good yarn, and occasionally play with it myself.

maquino

corsair00
I have heard a little bit about the holographic projections for PsyOps purposes in Jacques Vallee's ...

I first heard of JV in the mid-60s when he was another friend of Anton LaVey's. Struck me as a mystic and a dreamer who wrote essentially lightweight fantasy stuff, which was fine but not my thing; so I haven't paid any attention to him since then. Fastwalker sounds like a fun story; I enjoy the technique of mixing fact & fiction in a good yarn, and occasionally play with it myself.

So, how much of the "Introcaution" to Baron Rachane's book is true?

And is there any particular internet source which you feel to contain the most 'legitimate' archaeological information of the type described therein?

I too am a huge fan of fictional stories woven around factual history (esp. ancient history with a supernatural bent), but I prefer authors who definitively outline the true elements around which they've worked their fictions...Do you have any favorite such authors?