reply to post by Silicis n Volvo
Nations say many things for news service, propaganda and at the UN. Realistically as a rule of thumb saying you "oppose war" is what every nation
does... while planning for it.
Do you follow Chinese news? Here are some recent headlines
(Reuters) - Chinese state media on Monday blamed Syrian opposition forces in unusually specific finger pointing for training Muslim extremists
responsible for the deadliest unrest in four years in China's far-western region of Xinjiang.
An official Chinese newspaper said fighters from the ethnic Turkish Uighur minority were recruited to join Sunni rebels in Syria. The Global
Times, based in Beijing, said at least two separatist groups linked to Al Qaida were coordinating the trip from China to Syria. “After receiving
orders from Al Qaida, terrorists from China came to Syria to meet with jihadists already on the ground before forming groups on the front lines,” an
unidentified Chinese official told the newspaper on Oct. 29.
Now at face value, it would seem that the US and Nato is supporting one side and Russia and China the other.
Realistically however, Russia has Islamic issues in Chechnya, China has Islamic issues on it's Western front, And well we have them too...
So here you have the 5 members of the UN security council taking various sides in the region, all share a common interest in the regions Oil, all
share a common interest in keeping Islamic fundamentalism under control.
What I ask is "IS THIS WAR REAL"
No I don't expect China to turn on Russia either in all reality. I'm just posting above what "any sensible military siding from China would be in a US
vs Russia scenario" sides in some muslim conflict? very contrived if you ask me, war is about "WHAT I GET" in exchange for this action. Realistically
China would gain nothing from war with the USA and loose much, however siding with the USA the land grab would be immense and a victory much
easier.
Therefore, I must conclude.... this is all contrived, much deeper than some silly rebel training which for all intents and purposes be crushed by
china in weeks if they choose, really ask yourself what goes on anywhere in China, China doesn't know about... the simple answer is nothing, if there
wasn't some collusion to allow the rebel training while turning a blind eye as a pretext for this standoff with the USA.
WHY?
Why such a big deception?
The answer is in front of our faces if we look outside the box...
NWO, the five nations that run the UN security council are to a degree in cahoots, the "war" is with Islam in general, the oil is to be "assured" of
always reaching the East. Religious govt in general is what is under attack.
Am I the only one here that feels... this Putin Obama thing looks like "acting" the intense stare momentary the rest rather friendly?
NOTICE THIS:
Every single nation on the road between China and Europe is NOW OCCUPIED by one nation or another sitting atop the UN
China will shortly have "Boots on the ground" in Syria, on paper the whole thing is division, but realistically the entire Middle East has been
invaded by the nations controlling the UN security council.
Was it not Kissinger who said "The people would ASK for the intervention"
Good cop bad cop, in Eastern Europe US was good cop in the ME now Russia and China.... Meanwhile bit by bit Nations around the world LET IN one side
or the other by ASKING.
Riddle me this... while this all goes on, The EU, Russia, China, America all move to a global system of socialist/capitalist values... if you side
with the west, you have lessening freedoms, more socialism, if you sided with the East more Capitalism etc... in reality, all five members (the EU
represented by France and UK) are economically and politically coming to an almost identical global system and hence inevitably anyone under any side
will reach the same place.
Let's say war breaks out...
Who really suffers? Syrians... Iraqis, Iranians etc, etc et al, maybe it doesn't matter who wins? So long as, the powder keg is dissolved, the male
death toll in "the region" is massive, Israel is gone, Tehran is gone and ANY member of the UN security council in charge of the rubble when said and
done is the actual goal.
I have proposed that... The USA is supposed to loose this fight
Look at Russia, Europe is unified isn't it? The big bad bully of Russia led to an open invitation for western intervention across Europe, the wall
fell, The Soviet Union collapsed... Did it?
Did the streets run red with blood? OR did Russia having played it's part get 20 years for infrastructure?
Maybe in massive debt, having used our technology (conveniently shared with Russia and supposedly pirated by China) to soften the entire region (maybe
with a last super blow of destruction) maybe it's our turn having done our bit to "recuperate" with no actual or little harm done stateside...
Chinese boots as far west as Syria... without a shot fired? Convenience if your real agenda is a global order and the root is the UN
And they are ASKING to be "invaded" in this manner aren't they?
1000 Chinese marines?
To in the end protect what? Particularly IF this all turns hot... the hundreds of thousands of workers who will come to do cleanup duty and never
leave?
Every Nation in the ME has UN security council member boots on the ground now, the regions people are scared, if it goes HOT the only result of Nation
and culture will be the loss there of for the nations who's soil it is actually fought on.
Is this not the globalists real goal? Surely the US can not physically "occupy" the area... but China demographically surely can.
edit on 11-9-2013 by penninja because: (no reason given)