It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by anonentity
reply to post by Tinkerpeach
We might not take the third secret of Fatima seriously, but I think the catholic Church does. In its Divine dogma, It was supposed to be released in 1960...but was delayed until 2000, but then only in a sanitized version. Perhaps that's the reason Ratzinger left it to a younger man.
Originally posted by Tinkerpeach
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
I would disagree that they sanitized it at all.
I think the reason they didn't release it in 1960 is because of the enormous letdown it was. They probably feared that something so insignificant, which was supposed to be grand, would affect the standing of the Church.
Originally posted by Tinkerpeach
reply to post by anonentity
No I don't agree it was sanitized.
I think it was released as it was recorded by Lucia. I believe the Vatican held onto it past the release date because it didn't contain anything of any importance when there was a great expectation of what would be revealed.
Also, if you believe the Fatima is heavenly inspired than you must conclude that God would want it exposed to the people. I highly doubt a bunch of people in the Church have the power to combat the wishes of a God. Therefore we have to assume that either they are hiding something, in which case its bogus anyways because God doesn't exist, or that they released the correct version.
A third possibility is that God did indeed originate this through Virgin Mary and that he intentionally wanted the Vatican to withhold it. This of course makes no sense.
Originally posted by trinityalways
reply to post by jaws1975
S & F Sept is a huge month for a lot things coming to pass for sure! I would try and explain but most will just shoot me down and I have more pressing matters to tend too..
Blessings..
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Originally posted by anonentity
reply to post by Tinkerpeach
We might not take the third secret of Fatima seriously, but I think the catholic Church does. In its Divine dogma, It was supposed to be released in 1960...but was delayed until 2000, but then only in a sanitized version. Perhaps that's the reason Ratzinger left it to a younger man.
So Ratzinger jumped ship before the SHTF? You might be right.
I do believe you are correct about the 3rd secret beginning sanitized. I recall exorcist, Fr. Malachi Martin, in a C2C interview with Art Bell saying he was privy to the secret (close friend with one of the Popes) and if Catholics knew what it was they would run to the confessional on their knees. That didn't sound anything like was the Church presented.
Catholics can't take the 3rd secret seriously because they really don't know what it is about IMHO, with the exception of the Pope and their confidences.edit on 9/8/2013 by sad_eyed_lady because: (no reason given)
Sen Graham Warns of Nuke Strike After Missing Warheads Report.
Originally posted by stellawayten
I know a lot of you don't believe in the bible but when I saw this thread my jaw dropped. Check out revelation 9:13. And please don't flame me.