It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
charles1952
reply to post by colbe
Dear colbe,
I have to admit to some confusion. But, as I am Mr. Confusion, I don't mind it much.
Trying to look at things in the best possible light for GLBTQ members, I can think of only two positions for them to take.
1) Yes, we know that an active homosexual lifestyle is dangerous from a dozen different angles, but maybe, with societal acceptance and medical advancements, it won't be so bad.
2) Yes, we know that an active homosexual lifestyle is dangerous from a dozen different angles, but it is worth it to win in the struggle for (Rights? Respect? Acceptance?), whatever the struggle is for.
Saying that it is not dangerous is delusional, or propaganda.
As an outsider to the GLBTQ world, my opinion won't be welcomed, but it seems that avoiding an active homosexual lifestyle would be a smart move.
And you're quite right, prayer is powerful. Our hearts should be full of that, instead of hate and condescension.
With respect,
Charles1952
charles1952
reply to post by colbe
Dear colbe,
Please forgive me, I would never want to hurt or offend you. I'm sorry I wrote so poorly, may I try to explain?
Your words were not hateful and condescending. There are people, such as Westboro Baptist, and some without any religion who hate homosexuals. The Church does not, I do not, and I know you do not.
I was attempting, in 1) and 2) to make clear that an active homosexual lifestyle is dangerous for many reasons. It is also dangerous spiritually, but I thought few posters in this thread would respond to that. I completely agree that it is a very dangerous way of life for the mind, body, and soul.
I was also attempting to make clear that there were only two rationalizations available for taking that risk. Both of them are vague, uncertain, and dependent on others. Faced with that, it seemed reasonable to me to recommend avoiding an active homosexual lifestyle.
A chaste life without sex outside of marriage is the ideal, what God and common sense calls us to.
You will be attacked. No one likes to be told they're wrong, and we are in a time when ridicule has replaced argument.
The way I would help anyone supporting sodomy is the same way I would help anyone having trouble with a sin. For me, it is important to try to understand the person, their heart and their temptations. I would hope to approach them in a loving way and explain the risks they're running, both to themselves and their immortal souls. I would them show them a safe harbor in Jesus and His mercy and forgiveness. I would encourage them to find a spiritual advisor familiar with that kind of difficulty.
I love them, and I love you. I don't want to see any soul lost. You're quite right, sin is less a breaking of God's rules, than it is a breaking of God's heart.
With respect,
Charles1952
Darth_Prime
Why is my "Lifestyle" unhealthy just because i'm a homosexual? are you taking about sex? because that has nothing to do with the "Lifestyle"
i can name millions of unhealthy lifestyles Straight people and religious people live but what does that have to do with it?
I was also attempting to make clear that there were only two rationalizations available for taking that risk. Both of them are vague, uncertain, and dependent on others. Faced with that, it seemed reasonable to me to recommend avoiding an active homosexual lifestyle.
A chaste life without sex outside of marriage is the ideal, what God and common sense calls us to.
"I haven’t had sex in 29 years," Gunn confessed during Tuesday’s show, which focused on how to improve your sex life. "Do I feel like less of a person because of it? No, not even remotely."
When pressed, however, a visibly emotional Gunn said his nearly three-decade-long dry spell had been brought on by a previous relationship. "He was impatient with my sexual performance...it was at the cusp of AIDS [and] I’m happy to be healthy and alive, frankly."
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Metallicus
reply to post by wildtimes
Jesus may not have approved of the sinful behavior, but he would have loved the men and women just as much as anyone else. Jesus actually spent most of his time among sinners. He was all about love and acceptance.
JudgeEden
reply to post by Hoyden
I hate the word "practice", though im not really sure as to why.
Please, dont let your own prejudice exclude people from that which they shouldn't be excluded. Such "preaching" gives no one any hope. All it does is serve to instill the one who states such ignorance with more arrogance.
Is it any wonder many dont want to have anything to do with Christianity? If I knew only your types would make it to the next life, I would be inclined to bow out as well. I almost hate to say that because I do believe in it. However, who in the hell wants to spend an eternity with such uppity people?
Hoyden
Jesus loved the sinner but hated the sin.
Homosexual person which is not practicing the sin of homosexuality is not in conflict with Jesus and His teachings.