Your Vote ATS'ers: Attack or Not To Attack Syria for Alleged Chemical Attacks on its Own Citizens?

That's a big NO from me as well. Death for Democracy has had it's run, time to stop this madness.

No. No. No. No. No. No. No! Dammit.

I'm tired of the real terrorists in our government murdering, torturing, raping and stealing in our name. They need to be brought to justice ..... one way or another.

reply to post by ItDepends


NO, the U.S. should not strike Syria

NO simply NO

PS
Its good to see so many level headed ATSers
and not all jumping on the war (legal terrorist) wagon

Did anyone in Syria perform an unprovoked attack on America or its allies? No? Then no, we shouldn't interfere. Our politicians need to learn that it isn't our place to police the world.

reply to post by Xquizit


no!

No.
Not now, not ever.
Should stay out of other countries troubles. I'm sure you have plenty of your own.

so... no.

NO

Hmm difficult one, for me at least.

IF, (capitals as it is a big if) it can be proved that the Assad regime was behind this, then it would be foolish to rule out a military response, although a military response would not be my "go to" solution (as appears to be the case these days). Saying no would, in effect, legitimise the use of chemical weapons (or worse) by other regimes / governments around the world.

However, as things currently stand, i would have to say no.

What is now looking the most likely scenario is that Assad personally didn't authorise or agree with the use of Chemical weapons but someone in the regime did. Which really is a perfect demonstration of how badly things have deteriorated in Syria. If that proves to be the case, then those elements need identifying and then dealt with. Military strikes may or may not be the best way to do that, hard to say as we still do not for sure what happened.

NO!

This is like the real life version of the "sum of all fears" movie playing out.

My answer is no.

No evidence has been shown that proves Assad government ordered the attacks. It could be the rebels or any third party. All we have seen are the you tube video's of people suffering and dying. If Assad government is guilty of anything then it is in my view of not able to protect it's citizens from chemical attacks and the the heavy weaponary that the Islamist rebels posses.

What happened to a balance budget? I say NO!

It´s time to move humanity to the next level..
And the can only be done by saying NO to war and YES to peace.
And adding more fuel to a burning fire does not help.

NO to war YES to peace

Not just no..but hell no!! If America wants to invade yet another country.....why not invade Canada? Hell there's places there our military could go rome around in and the folks would'nt even know their there. Bomb a few ice flows. have an epic snowball fight.... a whole host of shat to keep em busy. How absurd is it that we are told the folks in these far off countries are a threat to us. I'm a little more afraid of the 25million illegal immigrants our Gov let walk across our Southern border......if their the terrorist boogey man.....we screwed, blued, & tatooed....Their inside the wire.

No, no and NO !!! US should stop acting as a world police and mind its own business.

reply to post by FlyersFan


I've got another for you. Assad's birthday is Sept. 11/1965. wiki

Surely no love affair between him and Obama, too?

no.

Big NO from me

I do too vote NO.

NO ATTACK WITHOUT PROPER EVIDENCE

NO

I don't care if he was walking around spraying the people one by one. It is not effecting America so it is none of our business.