It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
reply to post by 1questioner
Let's hope so because for too long this subject has been openly ignored by scientists
Carl Jung didn't ignore it, he wrote a book about it. He's a scientist.
His book is still ahead of its time, and if modern scientists take the ET mythos literally, then it always will be.
reply to post by Jukiodone
If UFO's are real we should accept that it's a technology we can't understand and move along
Originally posted by combatmaster
I personally believe that even if all 300 million american citizens sign a petition for UFO disclosure, it wont help.
The system is built in such a way that we do not have the power to initiate disclosure to humans on a mass scale. Even if we all wanted to, we cant, because the government has the power and we authorized them to have power by living in a civilization that is run by governmental bodies. This is the furthest we have come as a species. Maybe thats the reason the Extraterrestrials wont even disclose to us.
We have created the system that keeps us in the dark. Who is to blame if not humans?
Its all building up to that very satisfying day we can put those responsible for covering it up in a court room for the greatest crime ever committed against humanity at least not the originals but perhaps there predecessors predecessors...edit on 22-7-2013 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 1questioner
I read this article by Lee Speigel that I felt should be discussed here at ATS.
For a very long time, the scientific community has been wary of studying UFOs, and the scientists themselves hesitate to talk about their beliefs of unexplained aerial phenomena.
But that attitude is changing, and many scientists are joining the discussion without fear of ridicule.
"UFOs are real phenomena. They are artificial objects under intelligent control. They're definitely the craft of a supremely advanced technology," says physicist Eric Davis, a researcher of light-speed travel.
Davis, a research physicist at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin, studies propulsion physics, which he hopes will one day allow humans to travel easily and quickly through our galactic neighborhood.
He's aware of the public perception -- mostly from skeptics and debunkers -- that no legitimate scientists would ever touch the subject of UFOs.
"They're wrong, naive, stubborn, narrow-minded, afraid and fearful. It's a dirty word and a forbidden topic. Science is about open-minded inquiry. You shouldn't be laughing off people. You should show more deference and respect to them ... Scientists need to get back to using the scientific method to study things that are unknown and unusual, and the UFO subject is one of them."
Slowly but surely, acceptance of this subject is becoming mainstream.
Source
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
My basic understanding is that they wont discuss it because they need the "evidence" right there in front of them, and the fact that thousands have witnessed UFOs (some at close proximity) doesn't even constitute as "evidence".
But its true.
A lot of stories posted to the MUFON website (or here on ATS, or anywhere else) about white dots in the sky cannot be scientifically studied. I agree with the guy that there are a lot of people who would like to scientifically study UFO's, but you cant scientifically study a story of somebody saying "I saw a weird dot of light in the sky".
Give some examples, please, if you disagree, about exactly specifically what scientific study can be made of UFO sightings.
You missed my point, surely the eye witness reports themselves should be enough to make a scientist enquire more at least.
I think you miss the point that science requires direct observation.
Ever consider the possibility that the UFO enigma is a cultural phenomena that was purposefully fed by governmental disinformation agencies as a convenient cover story for civilian observations of what was then top secret military technology and is now perpetuated by conmen selling half truths and snake oil?
Originally posted by peashooter
"They're wrong, naive, stubborn, narrow-minded, afraid and fearful. It's a dirty word and a forbidden topic. Science is about open-minded inquiry. You shouldn't be laughing off people. You should show more deference and respect to them ... Scientists need to get back to using the scientific method to study things that are unknown and unusual, and the UFO subject is one of them."
Spot on, it's shocking how many people react very negatively when you bring up the topics of UFO's.
As if they know every single cause behind the phenomenon and anyone who brings up the topic is immediately looked down upon as if they're not "scientific" because they don't have solid "evidence".
Evidence to them is the day when every government has full blown disclosure about the UFO phenomenon, even though a quick internet search can allow you to access endless amounts of government/military documents, photos and sightings from all over the world.
We as humans can learn so much more if scientists around the world accept the fact that there are unknowns in the skies and can openly study the topics without ridicule or risk of losing their jobs due to "credibility".edit on 21-7-2013 by peashooter because: (no reason given)