It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Still you speak truth but what a hard form of Christianity to follow.
The "purest form of Christianity" was the one that ditched all of the pagan practices and did what God/Jesus told them to do. God boldly prohibited divination and mysticism
mys·ti·cism (mst-szm)
n.
1.
a. Immediate consciousness of the transcendent or ultimate reality or God.
b. The experience of such communion as described by mystics.
2. A belief in the existence of realities beyond perceptual or intellectual apprehension that are central to being and directly accessible by subjective experience.
That's what I am preaching, things that have been revealed to me through the Spirit. The things that are prior to the ego and how the ego can die.
Many Christian mystics opt for the second option - church traditions. They find that mystics and their practices existed from the very early days of church history. It is surprising that contemporary evangelicals sometimes cite Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions to justify their practices. But many do. They usually try to also find Biblical support, but such support cannot be found without twisting the Scriptures.
I believe that Scripture alone determines the valid means of coming to God. The Scripture reveals one obvious restriction: “Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me’” (John 14:6). The Bible not only reveals the only way to salvation, but it also provides the means of grace for living the Christian life. God does not leave this up to man’s ingenuity. He has not left us to sift through the religious practices of the cultures of the world in order to choose which ones to “Christianize.” Those who do are modern day Jeroboams who will not grant to God the right to tell them how God will be worshipped.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Is it possible that with your attention divided between Catholic and Orthodox, you have missed the best part of early Christianity? How about the Arians? The Copts? The Nestorians? The early British Church? How about the scattered apostolic churches which history has almost forgotten, such as the Waldensians?
There has been precious little genuine Christianity since the Council of Nicaea...
Originally posted by Bybyots
reply to post by Lazarus Short
There has been precious little genuine Christianity since the Council of Nicaea...
That's nonsense. Christ lives in the hearts of mankind. Saying that somehow Christianity died with the Council of Nicaea is an intellectual and academic conceit left over from the late 70's and early 80's.
The church has embraced Pauline theology over the words of Yeshua, so yes, the church / body which Yeshua started was well killed at the council of Nicaea.
So why am I posting this? Because Western Christianity is a watered down joke based on Catholicism
The problem is that what we are raised to believe is the path / way Yeshua showed us is wrong. So, are you really walking in his steps, being truly one with him in the Father if you don't even understand what his way was? The church has embraced Pauline theology over the words of Yeshua, so yes, the church / body which Yeshua started was well killed at the council of Nicaea.
5: “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.
6: But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
7: And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words.
8: Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
N.I.V.
What is your definition of the Kingdom of God?
You've been deceived into thinking your ego died when in reality, you just replaced it with a more puffed up version through your visions and experiences, just like the ones in the Old Testament.
Many Christian mystics opt for the second option - church traditions. They find that mystics and their practices existed from the very early days of church history. It is surprising that contemporary evangelicals sometimes cite Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions to justify their practices. But many do. They usually try to also find Biblical support, but such support cannot be found without twisting the Scriptures.
I believe that Scripture alone determines the valid means of coming to God. The Scripture reveals one obvious restriction: “Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me’” (John 14:6)
The Bible warned about such things... Ezekiel 13:6 , Ezekiel 12:24 , Jeremiah 14:14 , Ezekiel 21:23
If you think the "Kingdom of God" is only within and not a physical one coming, you have been deceived by spirits and your own ego for having sought them out in the first place.
You found a westernized dogma-fundie site which lacks the Mystical experiences of the Holy Spirit and therefore has set up an attack and apollogetics based on logic/reason. The Christian Mystic also has scripture as apollogetics but also has the added arsenal of direct experience.
That's all OT...... Jesus shows up and changes EVERYTHING!!!!!! Love God with all your heart, mind, soul, strength .....and also get the Ego Death, Grace, ad Mystical experiences of the Holy Spirit.
Faith/Belief are only used in the beginning.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Is it possible that with your attention divided between Catholic and Orthodox, you have missed the best part of early Christianity? How about the Arians? The Copts? The Nestorians? The early British Church? How about the scattered apostolic churches which history has almost forgotten, such as the Waldensians?
There has been precious little genuine Christianity since the Council of Nicaea...
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by UnifiedSerenity
The church has embraced Pauline theology over the words of Yeshua, so yes, the church / body which Yeshua started was well killed at the council of Nicaea.
How so? Paul said that grace was given to those who had FAITH, so how is that different from what Jesus said?
Yeshua said to call no man Father except God in heaven and Paul said to call him Father. You can read a great study on it titled, Paul's Gospel vs. Jesus Gospel.
The only problem is that most of you don't know your Bible well enough to know what it says.
If you did, you'd notice that these spirits that you talk to don't line up with what scriptures tell us. This should be your first clue.
Jesus didn't say anything about ego death and mystical experiences.
The New Birth 1Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews;2this man came to Jesus by night and said to Him, “Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.”3Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
He said that he would send the Holy Spirit as a comforter and as the one to remind them of his words and what should be written in scripture.
That's how you get led astray. Letting these spirits tell you that everything you want to experience is from God so that you don't need scripture any longer.
For those who don't know their scripture, they're in for a rude awakening when the false Christ comes and you fall for him too based on your "experiences" instead of wisdom and knowledge that comes from God through his Word.