It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why I understand your point....but people use Homosexual isn't natural so therefore it should not be accepted as an argument. But when you find certain things in Nature, like homosexuality...meaning animals will partner with the same sex for life like a flamingo...it proves you can find it in nature....we a all bound by the laws of nature like it or not...
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Djayed
I know I am one of the first to come to the defense of homosexuality here. But I'm beginning to realize (finally) that it does no good to try to convince a bigoted segment of society that there's nothing wrong with homosexuality. People are going to believe what they believe. And if they believe they should have a say in how other people live their lives (anti-freedom), there's not much to be done about it.
I have RARELY seen someone change their mind once they have their opinions about gay people and homosexuality. I say rarely, because I have seen it happen, but it takes an open mind... which is hard to come by in the anti-gay crowd.
So, yes, homosexuality is natural. As natural and beautiful as heterosexuality, left-handedness, blue eyes and baldness. But to try to convince those whose minds are already made up is a long, tough road.
I'm not saying I'm done discussing, arguing and debating about it, but I do so with lower expectations. You don't have to "sell yourself" or convince anyone that you're OK. Most of us know that already. The times are changing and it's a wonderful thing. Let the haters fall back and grumble about it.
Source
An estimated 9 million Americans -- or nearly 4 percent of the total population -- say they identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, according to a new report released this week from the Williams Institute, a think-tank devoted to LGBT research at UCLA.
Bisexuals make up slightly more than half that group, 1.8 percent of the total U.S. population, and they are substantially more likely to be women than men.
Originally posted by Djayed
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Thank you! I live in Georgia and feel like I'm a second class citizen. I have been in a eight year relationship and cannot get married. I support my partner since they were laid off over 3 years ago...I am not able to add him to my work insurance...I am not able to claim him as a dependent....I am not able to account for him on my taxes...I can get fired for being a homosexual.....I can get beat up walking out of a club....I get called things like sinner, unnatural, immoral, among the list of not so safe words for ATS....so it gets to a point where I am tired...tired of not having the same rights as everyone in a country tha claims to be free.
Thank you for your kind words and support....I always see you in the discussion for equal rights and thank you for your opinion and what you contribute to the discussion!
www.psychologytoday.com...
Fear is adaptive because it protects us. More importantly, it protected our ancestors. Our distant ancestors who were afraid of heights didn’t fall off cliffs, those that feared wild animals didn’t get eaten by a tiger, those that ran the fastest left the rest behind---and they survived. So, it is natural to be afraid of many of the things that we are afraid of. It’s natural to have a fear of water---especially if you are a child---because you can drown.
In one study, 77 % of mothers of children who were afraid of water said their children were frightened the very first time they were confronted with a pool or lake water. In fact, the farther away from the ocean you live, the more likely you are to fear water.
Originally posted by Rodinus
Homosexual behaviors are acts.
So, Heterosexual "behaviour" is not an act?
Why use the word "behaviour" for wording sexuality that people are born with? (Natural)
And why use the word "act"?
Kindest respects
Rodinusedit on 29-6-2013 by Rodinus because: Word added
Originally posted by daaskapital
Infertility cannot be compared to homosexuality. They are two different things.
While it is natural in specific circumstances, it is not normal in the fact that two men cannot reproduce and two women cannot reproduce.
I respect homosexual people as i would anyone else. I have stated what i have stated because it is the observable truth.
No i do not, mostly because the conversation has never really come up.
Originally posted by theRhenn
Read the Christian bible from the 1500's it might change your opinions of those verses you are referencing the all mighty is against homosexuality....most of them originally meant evil acts....
The term homosexuality is a 19th century created term
Show me where "homosexuality" is in the bible? Man shall not lie with man as with women is more specific...
Originally posted by theRhenn
Identical -- or monozygotic -- twins form when a single fertilized egg splits in two after conception. Because they form from a single zygote, the two individuals will have the same genetic makeup. Their DNA is virtually indistinguishable.
This is textbook... Go back to your science books and reread.
You're confusing something that is with something that's chosen. Homosexuality is not a race. You cannot compare it as such. You are bias because you are homosexual.
Funny you should bring up about the studies of the amount of women around homosexuals... do you think the "woman" aspect might rub off on gays a lil? If you're always around a woman with no male role model, dont you think that this person would take after women more, even if they're not gay? I would think so.. It's a DUH! factor. It has nothing to do with the amount of women geneticaly in a family.. the amount of estrogen.. Duh!
Why do you think that people are so up in arms about children having homosexual parents as rolemodels?
Ever hear of the kids that loved their uncles enough to walk in their footsteps? Don't you know that children from divorced parents are more likely to do the same? Abusive fathers tend to make abusive sons and have daughters that unconciously look for abusive partners...
duh! duh!
Think about this for a minute. Step outside your gayness and look at it from a different perspective. I've tried to do the same the other way around and I just find it based on bias without any logical basis.
Step outside my "Gayness"?? Wow , that's all I have to say. My world does not revolve around gayness....thanks
The studies show when there are a high number of women in the immediate family....a lot of sisters for example...will have a higher likely hood of having a gay child.
I might add to the woman vs homo argument. I found that in my whole family, and that's a lot of peopleedit on 6/29/2013 by Djayed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Djayed
reply to post by theRhenn
Proposition 1: NT
Proposition 2: NT
Proposition 3: Two of the three passages that possibly refer to homosexuality are simply more-or-less miscellaneous catalogs of behaviors that are regarded as unacceptable, with no particular emphasis placed on any individual item in the list.
1 Corinthians 6:9–10 says that certain types of people “will not inherit the kingdom of God.” The list of such people begins with fornicators, idolaters, and adulterers, and it ends with thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, and robbers. Near the middle—between adulterers and thieves—are the two Greek words translated in the New Revised Standard Version as “male prostitutes” (that is, homosexual male prostitutes) and “sodomites.” But no special emphasis is placed on these people; they are simply listed along with the others. Similarly, 1 Timothy 1:8–11 says that the law was given not for good people but for bad people, and it then provides a list, giving representative examples of who these “bad people” might be. Included in the list—this time near the end but again without any special emphasis—is the Greek word translated in the New Revised Standard Version as “sodomites.” In both texts, such people are mentioned simply in passing, in more-or-less miscellaneous catalogs of unacceptable behaviors, but with no special emphasis or attention called to them.
Such miscellaneous lists of “vices” are fairly common not only in the New Testament and other early Christian literature but also in Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greco-Roman, and Jewish writings.3 They appear to have been somewhat stereotypical in nature, representing a kind of laundry list or grab bag of negative labels that could be trotted out and used for rhetorical purposes with little attention to individual items in the lists. As something of an analogy, I cite a passage from Arlo Guthrie’s famous ballad, “Alice’s Restaurant.” In speaking of his own arrest for littering and his assignment to “Group B” in the jail, Guthrie characterizes this group as follows:
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Djayed
I know I am one of the first to come to the defense of homosexuality here. But I'm beginning to realize (finally) that it does no good to try to convince a bigoted segment of society that there's nothing wrong with homosexuality. People are going to believe what they believe. And if they believe they should have a say in how other people live their lives (anti-freedom), there's not much to be done about it.
I have RARELY seen someone change their mind once they have their opinions about gay people and homosexuality. I say rarely, because I have seen it happen, but it takes an open mind... which is hard to come by in the anti-gay crowd.
So, yes, homosexuality is natural. As natural and beautiful as heterosexuality, left-handedness, blue eyes and baldness. But to try to convince those whose minds are already made up is a long, tough road.
I'm not saying I'm done discussing, arguing and debating about it, but I do so with lower expectations. You don't have to "sell yourself" or convince anyone that you're OK. Most of us know that already. The times are changing and it's a wonderful thing. Let the haters fall back and grumble about it.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by daaskapital
Originally posted by daaskapital
Infertility cannot be compared to homosexuality. They are two different things.
Oh, well, isn't that convenient? "That's different". Good answer.
While it is natural in specific circumstances, it is not normal in the fact that two men cannot reproduce and two women cannot reproduce.
That is a scientific fact. Even if they're straight, two men cannot reproduce! You are avoiding answering my questions.
I respect homosexual people as i would anyone else. I have stated what i have stated because it is the observable truth.
Well, then why don't you have the guts to call ME "unnatural" or "abnormal". Since, like a gay couple, I cannot reproduce? I know... "That's different", right?
No i do not, mostly because the conversation has never really come up.
Bring it up with your gay friends. If it's not an insult, I challenge you to ask them, "Hey guys, I think homosexuality is not normal or natural." Let us know what they say.
Originally posted by caladonea
I am heterosexual and I do not announce this to society; I just am... who I am.
As I am writing this I am thinking; I may have my own answer...gay people are fighting for the basic human rights...that everyone in society should have.
Originally posted by theRhenn
Accept that people dont agree with you. Man, I sure wish everyone agreed with me! But it wont happen.
The question people, especially heterosexual people need to ask is When did you decide to like the opposite sex?