It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
That doesn't make sense.
The pursuit of the souls.
Do not know what is happening in the 4-9 D, what their rules of engagement are.
4) Deities often represent something we wish we could be. They represent perfection, capability, invulnerability, beauty, everything that we would imagine to be plentiful and intrinsic in a utopian world with utopian species. a significant portion of our fascination with, and adoration for, deities stems from our insecurities as a result of being weak, finite, ignorant creatures. We're not satisfied with what we are, so we worship what we want to be in the hopes that if we wish for it hard and long enough, we will eventually be it. And even if that never happens, we'll never be foolish enough to be satisfied with what we are now.
Toward that end, I advocate the appreciation and recognition of what we are. Just because we're imperfect doesn't make us worthless. Just because we're weak in some ways doesn't mean we're not vastly powerful in others. Belief and worship of deities discourages us from such a stance because we are forever in the shadow of that which we admire.
Really, every ideology will need to expand if that is the case, which all points to the same idea I concluded. That every individual ideology was just one "bubble" in something like the eye of a fly. Even more amazing was the fact these were all simultaneously sustained in the same medium/universe. The very existence of that vast diversity points to a pretty incredible system, whether it is called God, the Universe, or All That Is.. we are all looking at the same awe-inspiring event.
The issue I have with "deity," is that it tends to carry some pretty strong connotations. One is that a "deity" is somehow separate from the system over which it presides. Kind of like the idea of a human male figure sitting on a throne. While this is how it is viewed in some contexts, it is not one that I hold true.
"Deities" also tend to require some type of worship.
As a human concept, I am not sure this is even relevant to the rest of the Universe.
Another is that somehow this "deity" actively punishes and rewards those who do it the "right" way, but we seem to all of that just fine on our own. I think that people try to get out of personal responsibility with this single concept because regardless of a God/s, we are fully capable of choosing and creating either concept of heaven or hell. It just happens here and now.
Sure, I'm conscious and processing, but I have no conscious or subconscious connection to the rest of the universe. The universe does not react when I stub my toe. I do not cry out in pain when a supernova annihilates a dozen moons.
There's a lot of differences between the universe and a traditional god. I'm not being aggressive or antagonistic here, I'm trying to understand. And I think, from what you have explained so far, that "god" is the wrong word for what you're trying to say.
For decades, neuroscientists, psychologists, and an army of brain researchers have been struggling, in vain, to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. Now there is a clear trail to the answer, and it leads through the dense jungle of quantum physics, Zen, and subjective experience, and arrives at an unexpected destination.
In this tour-de-force of scientific investigation, Evan Harris Walker shows how the operation of bizarre yet actual properties of elementary particles support a new and exciting theory of reality, based on the principles of quantum physics-a theory that answers questions such as "What is the nature of consciousness, of will?" "What is the source of material reality?" and "What is God?”
This message by itself should have it's own thread.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by AfterInfinity
The study of astrology reveals a fine example of the practical application of fractal geometry.
(I have been waiting to jump back into this thread for the past 30 pages or so, but I seem to have lost the plot of the conversation.)
Originally posted by wildtimes
THIS
TOO
IS
BRILLIANT.
Wow, you guys are amazing. This is what I love about ATS - this sort of open-ended discussion that stretches the mind and pushes the boundaries. I'm proud to be part of the team!!!
It's like being at a TED-Talk!!
Just wanted to let you know I'm getting caught up, still reading. I'll probably go back and read the posts again, but there's too much to try to quote/reply - I'd have 100 posts in a row if I did that!
Keep 'talking', Serdg.....
(who the hell ARE you? I can't figure it out. I have some guesses, but no real idea)
Originally posted by wildtimes
YES!!!
I feel like throwing a party!!
Originally posted by wildtimes
Ahhhh..but don't you SEE, Aft ???? Yes, you DO have a connection, both conscious AND unconscious to the rest of the universe!!! WE ALL DO! We ARE the universe, just as much as a supernova or a stubbed toe.
Maybe it's your definition of what a 'god' is supposed to be. This is a perfect example of how Western thinkers don't easily wrap their heads around the Eastern idea of ONE-NESS, of interconnectedness - we are ALL CONNECTED to EVERYTHING. We EACH have a slice of the universe's consciousness. We are all 'God'. And what we do DOES have an impact on everything else.
It was really slow reading for me, because I am NOT a mathematical genius, and have only a pedestrian grasp on physics to begin with, including quantum theories - I do get the double-slit experiment, and string theory, sorta kinda, at least, and I'm working my way painfully through The Elegant Universe, a book of Daddy's given to me by mom after he died.
And we literally have only THIS INSTANT - oops - no THIS ONE - erm - THIS one! You see?
Originally posted by Serdgiam
You have more to add to this conversation than you let on mystic.
For one, you are the link between the old and new. What brought you to this thread?
What brought me to this thread? Stimulating discussions, generally, and an interest in the shift of perspective involved in the conversion from one belief to another.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Serdgiam
LOL!
Ugh, speaking of ointment - I've got a wicked case of poison ivy right now - and just came in to take my medication after applying the ointment and icepack -
long and totally off-topic story, but.....maybe it's YOU that gave me this rash!!! *Thinks: conspiracy, it's a conspiracy*
(but I will ask - did I interact with you 'before'? I'm comparing members' styles and what I know of their personal/health issues, and you just aren't matching up with anyone on here. Or OFF of here, except possibly Stephen Hawking. (Will watch for a u2u.)
It's okay, I'm comfortable now - so sarcas-me all you like.
I'll let you know if you're out of bounds. Obvi. Don't worry, your 'crush' will soon dissipate and you can just join my fan club. I'll even add you to the friends list! But no autographed picture, sorry. But their aren't any dues, either. )
So, have you read The Physics of Consciousness as mentioned above??
I hadn't thought of the book earlier in the thread, but yes, as soon as you went to quantum and totality and 42 and all that - I remembered it. It would be a PERFECT read for anyone here looking to intertwine physics with 'faith'. In fact, it was your thoughts that reminded me. So this is really all YOUR FAULT?!
*electrolytes*
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
This is of great interest to me too. We must ask: with such a shift in perspective, what in us actually changes? So far the only difference I can see is the literature we subscribe to.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
You seem to know me better than I know myself.
What brought me to this thread? Stimulating discussions, generally, and an interest in the shift of perspective involved in the conversion from one belief to another.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
This is of great interest to me too. We must ask: with such a shift in perspective, what in us actually changes? So far the only difference I can see is the literature we subscribe to.
This just gave me a real hearty laugh! My overflowing bookshelves seem to be a testament to the truth of your statement.