It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
your not wanting to be sure you already have your pre concieved thoughts and feelings. You insinuate im a racist lying thug.
Originally posted by GonzoSinister
Originally posted by FreedomEntered
Well any child pedophile rings need to be exposed asap and everything in peoples power needs to be done to stop and prevent these from accuring again.
And that goes for ANY pedophile ring from ANY religion.
I Agree 100% but im just wanting to be sure that what is being made out within the posts is that Muslims are commiting these atrocities on a greater scale than non muslims, otherwise when dealing with Race or religous based arguments it would be a moot point as the issue is there are pedophile gangs, not that they are Muslim.. surely?
jimmy saville and who else? I didnt know one man could be a gang?strange . And whats wrong with drinking? Your not a muslim vigilante are you?
Originally posted by WilsonWilson
It would seem EDL rallies may differ, the ones i have witnessed near us, have been little better than skin head rallies.
Lots of disturbing chanting, the groups then hit the pubs after, which leads to them singing racist songs and swearing in the streets.
and this is in daytime while people are still walking around with their children.
The people that seem to focus on the race of certain peadophile rings, seems to completely discount the one that was operating out of the BBC, all of which seem to be white (although i could be wrong)
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by GonzoSinister
Any comments on the link i provided? Oh i see what your getting at about highlighting only one side of the story
The case raised a serious debate about whether the crimes were racially motivated. [19] There were suggestions that police and social work departments failed to act when details of the gang first emerged for fear of appearing racist, and ignored vulnerable white teenagers who were being groomed by Pakistani men. [22][23][24] Tim Loughton, the Minister for Children and Families, stated that while there was no evidence that any ethnic communities condoned child sexual abuse, he was concerned that some had been slow to report it to the police, and urged police and social workers not to allow "political correctness around ethnicity" to hinder their work to apprehend such crimes. [25]
Originally posted by GonzoSinister
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by GonzoSinister
Any comments on the link i provided? Oh i see what your getting at about highlighting only one side of the story
For your above posts, i have not said anything about Racism, at all, i dont know why you keep suggesting it?
for the one i quoted, i have only read through the reports, a video is no good to me at work so i will need to watch it later, as niether the report that accompanies your video your provided summarise the video with "muslim Gangs" i decided to wait untill i can watch the video to comment on it.
also i have not at any point said what you are saying is false, mearly asked what it relates too in terms of victims outwith the muslim gangs, for example, i know froma brief google search that they reckon about 250,000 children are trafficed in the US each year as slaves\sex slaves etc. as such im presuming these are not all done by muslims so i would like to know what figure actually is in terms of a percentage?
there somewhere must be the same figure for the uk, if for example you could show that 80% of trafficing of children in the Uk was done by muslim gangs then your point about it happening would be valid, however if it was then shown infact only 30% or 40% of the trafficking was done by muslims then you would be singling out the Muslims as the cause of somthing that they are not, they are mearly a part of the bigger picture
(again i cannot stress it is sick and must be stopped, i just need to see actual evidence to prove it is "muslims" causing it rather than "people")
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
The case raised a serious debate about whether the crimes were racially motivated. [19] There were suggestions that police and social work departments failed to act when details of the gang first emerged for fear of appearing racist, and ignored vulnerable white teenagers who were being groomed by Pakistani men. [22][23][24] Tim Loughton, the Minister for Children and Families, stated that while there was no evidence that any ethnic communities condoned child sexual abuse, he was concerned that some had been slow to report it to the police, and urged police and social workers not to allow "political correctness around ethnicity" to hinder their work to apprehend such crimes. [25]
Originally posted by GonzoSinister
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by GonzoSinister
Any comments on the link i provided? Oh i see what your getting at about highlighting only one side of the story
For your above posts, i have not said anything about Racism, at all, i dont know why you keep suggesting it?
for the one i quoted, i have only read through the reports, a video is no good to me at work so i will need to watch it later, as niether the report that accompanies your video your provided summarise the video with "muslim Gangs" i decided to wait untill i can watch the video to comment on it.
also i have not at any point said what you are saying is false, mearly asked what it relates too in terms of victims outwith the muslim gangs, for example, i know froma brief google search that they reckon about 250,000 children are trafficed in the US each year as slaves\sex slaves etc. as such im presuming these are not all done by muslims so i would like to know what figure actually is in terms of a percentage?
there somewhere must be the same figure for the uk, if for example you could show that 80% of trafficing of children in the Uk was done by muslim gangs then your point about it happening would be valid, however if it was then shown infact only 30% or 40% of the trafficking was done by muslims then you would be singling out the Muslims as the cause of somthing that they are not, they are mearly a part of the bigger picture
(again i cannot stress it is sick and must be stopped, i just need to see actual evidence to prove it is "muslims" causing it rather than "people")
Since late 2011 the Office of the Children's Commissioner has been making a two-year inquiry into child sexual exploitation by street gangs. [26] After the sentencing of the Rochdale gang, the UK’s Department of Education announced new funding for a specialist foster care scheme to help protect vulnerable children in residential care, as some of those who had been victims of the gang had been. [27]
Wikipedia article,google is your friend,-sometimes
Originally posted by charles1952
I just had a strange thought. In the US, if you commit a crime against a member of a particular group (and a couple of other requirements) it gets classified as a "Hate Crime." Could Rigby, the Boston marathon, and the thousands of other deadly attacks by Sunnis each year also be considered "hate crimes?"
If so, will the Southern Poverty Law Center label Sunni Muslims as a hate group? And since Sunnis are 75% - 90% of the Islamic population, can't we label Islam as the religion of hate?
No deep analysis here, I'm just letting my mind wander where it will.