It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PhyberDragon1
reply to post by flyswatter
"once the choice to pull the trigger is made, it should absolutely be a shot to kill, and that goes for anyone, not just cops."
Use of force should be used to either: dissuade her from a particular course of action, or to physically intervene to stop her and should only use the amount of force necessary to control the incident, effect an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm or death. That is, other levels of force must have been attempted first unless lethal force is the only way to minimize loss of life. That is to say, they should have used negotiation or other "conflict resolution" techniques. If she refused to desist, or attempts to flee, progress from verbal orders, through to physical restraint, up to wounding or injuring her, if possible. If it was not possible, then and only then, use lethal force. Killing her can only be justified if there was sufficient evidence to suggest that it was reasonable to believe that she posed an imminent threat to the life or well-being of another. If there was an alternative, then, there was no imminent threat requiring killing her. Short of that, if one just shoots to kill every time they pull a gun, instead of seeking a more least restrictive alternative first, like some other method to resolve the situation that doesn't require the gun or shooting to wound or injure, instead of just killing, if it did require the gun, then, maybe, that person lacks skills and good judgement and should not have a gun. And, perhaps, their state of mind should be evaluated and they should possibly be removed from society. Additionally, if ones intent is to kill and nothing else when they pull a gun and that can be proven (like comments they may make online or elsewhere), then, they might be charged for murder with intent to kill -- cop or otherwise.
Starship Captain, James T. Kirk: Ah! We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;
we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men. -- Star Trekkin', The Firm
Sources of info:
www.nij.gov...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 3-6-2013 by PhyberDragon1 because: additional info
Originally posted by Maverick7
You act as though the cops were just sitting around enjoying a donut and a knife waving Viking berserker woman descended upon them.
No, they had ample warning, ample time to get geared up and ample time to respond in a large overwhelming force. After all keeping other COSTCO customers safe was clearly NOT their priority. They didn't even clear the store. They RUSHED in, being heroic discovered that a 5'3, 38 yo woman provoked unreasoning fear in ONE of them and he shot her five times, as though she was a charging rhinoceros.
His partner clearly did not panic, he didn't shoot her at all.
Originally posted by TheMagus
1-translation: i don't really give a shizzle, but will sociop*COUGH* "sanely" pretend to
2-this cop "hater"* lives in jurisdiction, where as of january past, police follow a policy of shoot to kill at the least sign of resistance resistance includes raising your voice, arguing, or making any sudden moves
ROFL
as of january past, i have a policy of my own, to be applied at the least sign of initialization of force, which includes intentionally invading my personal space to trigger fight/flight reactions. the local cops have been apprised of this, none have seen fit to call my "bluff" as of yet. [keyboard "tough" guys need not apply.]
*one only hates that which one fears
3-not even going to debate this one, as it is merely a projection of police-think,[oxymoron, I know] not everyone is a shivering, cowardly, sociopa*COUGH* Defender of the "Sane Society" with a trigger finger starting at their own shadow. never mind the extremely offensive projection of lackadaisical carelessness regarding the security of ones children in public.
4-tragedy indeed for the murder victim and her loved ones, especially her kids, who will then have salt rubbed in the wounds in terms of seeing accountability and justice.
for her killer, [and accomplice] it's a career milestone, followed by raises in rank and pay,
hence a comedy.
Originally posted by opethPA
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal.
These are principles that every man of every faith can embrace.
NEVER is it acceptable to kill someone,
The fact that American police swan about with guns all the time is absurd
If they cannot police people through the use of reason and respect,
Then they are NOT police. They are just licensed murderers.
Take firearms away from the many!!
They are a war machine and have no place in villages, towns, cities etc.
Shame on all of you who try to justify murdering your fellow man.
Good luck living in a fantasy world.
Originally posted by ladytamatha
Why are so many men so vicious toward women??? Don't they have mothers? Isn't it possible that the lady had those items in her hands because it was her job to have those items in her hands? She was justifiably upset. Who wouldn't be upset if they are passing out samples of product, hoping to get a commission from the sale of the product and the store is out of stock? Why would she want to pass out product that a customer couldn't purchase? Maybe, she was finally fed up with listening to the customers complain and felt she needed to voice her frustration. Why do so many men now a days seem to feel so threatened by a woman voicing her frustration? In her attempt to tell her side of the story, she forgot she had those items in her hands and for that she was viciously gunned her down in cold blood. It is a very scary time to be a woman. Who will protect us from our protectors?
Originally posted by junglimogli
reply to post by MongusePro
Handing out samps at Costo isn't exactly a good job .. we all have bad days ..
So are we saying that it's ok for the pigs to shoot anyone having a bad day ?
Anyone having a bad day uses some bad language and possibly just waves something here and there .. maybe to even point at the people who pissed 'um off ..
Whatever the case .. tazed and then shot to death ... wow!
The dude is right .. she could have been subdued in any other way .. even just throwing a blanket over her is enough to subdue her .. pigs are way out of control!
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
Stop being so arrogant that you're right, The U.K is NOT perfect by any means,
But can you (americans) imagine living in a country where murder is a RARE occurance?
Can you imagine how much safer you would feel knowing that you're country only suffered 3,095 murders rather than FOURTEEN THOUSAND?
*rant over*
Originally posted by tazdeill2
This has shocked me, and I thought I was beyond all that.
It sounds like the woman was having some sort of breakdown, so she was shot because she was mad?
What would the Police have done if guns were not allowed? How about - evacuate the store, talk to her and calm her down, or wait until she had calmed down herself. Tear gas perhaps? Chocolate and a cup of tea?
Unless she had gone for someone with the knife and someones life was in imminent danger, The action of the Police is outrageous and scary.
Originally posted by opethPA
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
Stop being so arrogant that you're right, The U.K is NOT perfect by any means,
But can you (americans) imagine living in a country where murder is a RARE occurance?
Can you imagine how much safer you would feel knowing that you're country only suffered 3,095 murders rather than FOURTEEN THOUSAND?
*rant over*
It has nothing to do with arrogance.
Violent people live in every country and every corner of the world.
Also I am sure the families of those 3095 people that were murdered in the UK feel very safe.
Until you can remove the violent element from humanity then you are risk of being murdered regardless of what country you live in.
Originally posted by opethPA
Originally posted by tazdeill2
This has shocked me, and I thought I was beyond all that.
It sounds like the woman was having some sort of breakdown, so she was shot because she was mad?
What would the Police have done if guns were not allowed? How about - evacuate the store, talk to her and calm her down, or wait until she had calmed down herself. Tear gas perhaps? Chocolate and a cup of tea?
Unless she had gone for someone with the knife and someones life was in imminent danger, The action of the Police is outrageous and scary.
Unless the information that the situation was presenting made the cop that shot her feel that someones life was in imminent danger.
As much as the "Cops are evil" crowd want to believe it each situation like this is fluid and dynamic. Their are no two people that act the same in a stressful situation.
I wish the cop would not have shot her but way more than that I wish that the suspect would not have caused the situation.
Originally posted by ladytamatha
Thank you for responding. Yes, I did read the article. I admit, I read the article on a different conspiracy web site. To my knowledge, the information you have provided was not mentioned on the other site. I didn't read ANYTHING about the lady taking the knife away from someone else. The article I read, stated she already had the utensils in her hands due to her job description. Yes, they mentioned that she was really upset and someone called the police. The article mentioned that the police opened fire with shoppers still in the store and how shocked they were that the police would open fire with so many shoppers in the area. Truth be told, I wasn't there so I don't know what the truth might be.
I'm old enough to remember a time in our country when things like this just wouldn't happen. There has been a change in this country. In the old days lethal use of force was a last resort. Now a days it seems like our society has become, shoot first and ask questions later. I for one, don't want to fear my protectors. I want to honor them and see them as the HERO'S I grew up to believe they are. As a woman, this article and the other article where the woman was beaten black and blue, by men dressed, in black and blue, concerns me. Lethal force should always be a last resort. Why didn't they taze her? Pepper spray her? Anything other then kill her? Life is a very precious gift to all of us. How did it become seen as being so cheap?
Originally posted by RoScoLaz
we are at a moment in time when the police have total carte blanche to do as they wish. they've never had it so 'good'. they are untouchable. they are all powerful. they are the last word.
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by research100
That's all fine and well, but it looks like cover.
What movements? Did she specifically threaten anyone with the knife or was she gesturing with her hands?
What "crazy comments?"
My beef with this story in the media is that it is all fluff. Where is the actual description of her "crazy" behavior, in the words of actual witnesses to it? Perhaps it's out there somewhere and I just haven't seen it?
I'd also like to see a timeline, from the point she was intercepted by the officers to the shooting itself. What steps were taken to determine whether or not she was an actual threat, or was simply suffering from a seizure of some sort? How much time elapsed between these steps before the final decision to end the threat via lethal force was acted upon by the officers involved?
None of that is in ANY of the stories I have read so far. The cops may have done a FINE job (or perhaps they didn't) but the journalists who have reported on this story so far "suck hard."