It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by abeverage
Ok that is the first time I have ever seen any photograph purported to be the BKS! I must say it looks like a cross between ALIEN and the Protoss from StarCraft!
Originally posted by Ormuz
I'm sorry, honestly,
but am i the only sane being in the village here ?,
Originally posted by Ormuz
my inner gut feeling screams "distraction" ... i mean ... this is a topic posted by a super moderator is it not ??
Originally posted by Ormuz
are we not steered away from other more significant story's of the day ?
Originally posted by Ormuz
are we serious or are we not in our activities on this website?
Originally posted by Ormuz
reply to post by LiveForever8
hahaha, that's awesome bro, a good belly laugh is just what i needed
Muzz
Originally posted by TheCrimsonGhost
Well I read the first few pages, before this turned into a pissing contest between some of you. From the pics in the original post I don't see how it couldn't be a rock, or a piece of twisted metal from one of the many countries on earth now shooting their respective garbage into space for the last 60 years. Nothing to make me think this is anything other than space junk, but would love to see any evidence if it exists. Time to search for the previous threads and hope they contain more info than this one.edit on 1-6-2013 by TheCrimsonGhost because: (no reason given)
Astronomer Clyde Tombaugh, who spotted the planet Pluto (1930), is looking for a nearer and even more elusive object: a second satellite of the earth. Since he refuses to give details and refers questioners to Army Ordnance-in Washington, it is fair to assume that the famous rocket-men who work for Army Ordnance are interested in the project. They may want merely to know what opposition from nature their rockets are apt to encounter when they climb deep into space. Or they may have a more ambitious interest: a nearby, natural satellite might be a more convenient base in space than the... Read more
Professor Tombaugh is closemouthed about his results. He won't say whether or not any small natural satellites have been discovered. He does say, however, that newspaper reports of 18 months ago announcing the discovery of natural satellites at 400 and 600 miles out are not correct. He adds that there is no connection between the search program and the reports of so-called flying saucers.[16] At a 1957 meteor conference in Los Angeles, Tombaugh reiterated that his four-year search for natural satellites had been unsuccessful.[17] In 1959 Tombaugh issued a final report stating that nothing had been found in his search.