It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IntrinsicMotivation
reply to post by frazzle
I do agree we are living in a rigged system and that the man appointed president does not really call the shots.
It is like this
“Peep out the CONcept, you got PROgress, you got CONgress,
You PROtest in hopes they CONfess, just PROceed on your CONquest”
Another issue I have can be found in my signature.
edit on 1-6-2013 by IntrinsicMotivation because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IntrinsicMotivation
Originally posted by frazzle
Obama has never left off campaigning, especially whenever his approval ratings are tanking hard.
Well he can stop with it now that he cannot run for reelection in 2016
First off, you are entirely correct that I was requesting proof from the other guy...forgive me. I had my schizophrenics confused with my paranoids. Mea Culpa.
Originally posted by ParanoidAmerican
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Nothing because I didn't say that, that was the other guy you debating with request proof yet providing none yourself......
Originally posted by frazzle
Don't forget the CONstitution, which was written in secret by men of wealth and power. When they wrote the part of the preamble that promises to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity", they were not speaking to the people in a public forum but to each other in a closed room from which the public was barred. So who were they speaking of when they used the term "ourselves"?
Originally posted by MidnightTide
Nope, I believe in equal opportunity for everyone. I just don't like the "poor me" attitude. I really don't know what you expect out of people. I know you think I am uncaring about Native Indians, but that is not true. I did state Natives did get screwed in their dealings with European settlers. But instead of the knee jerk, emotional reaction what do you want.
You want a holiday named after Native Americans? A month? You want Native American studies more prelevent in school?
Whatever you want, but at the end of the day what does it mean. Nothing. You are still stuck in a rut. I still do not see the point of this thread other then to bemoan the fact that Native American culture has been in decline for quite some time. As many cultures thought history, adapt or die.
So who were these men that are created equal that was being referenced?
Originally posted by frazzle
The authors were men who gave themselves the authority to define what being a man is and in so doing elevated themselves to the level of gods. A lot of people still think of them that way and THAT, IMO, is the problem.
Anyone who thinks the courts are now, or ever have been about justice are the ones who are blind, at least legally blind.
edit on 1-6-2013 by frazzle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IntrinsicMotivation
Originally posted by frazzle
The authors were men who gave themselves the authority to define what being a man is and in so doing elevated themselves to the level of gods. A lot of people still think of them that way and THAT, IMO, is the problem.
Anyone who thinks the courts are now, or ever have been about justice are the ones who are blind, at least legally blind.
edit on 1-6-2013 by frazzle because: (no reason given)
You have hit the nail on the head Frazzle
I have voiced this in another thread
They do not teach us the Law in public education and there is literally thousands of statutes, codes, ordinances, laws and regulations that vary in each municipality from coast to coast.
Once again it is like we are being set up to fail by public education.
How can my parents teach me all of the laws, when they were never taught them?
There are plenty of useless laws out there but we can save that for a new thread
If attitudes do not change it does not look good statistically speaking. Will you remember the plight of Native Americans?
In 1997, New York State attempted to enforce taxation of Indian gasoline and cigarettes. The attempt was thwarted after numerous Senecas protested by setting fire to tires and cutting off traffic to Interstate 90 and New York State Route 17 (the future Interstate 86).[26]
The relationship between the Seneca Nation and the surrounding population has been contentious, both in regard to excise tax advantages and in regard to property rights. In the 1990s, the Senecas won a prolonged court battle to assume ownership of all land on their reservation, including that owned by private non-Senecas, and demanded the previous owners all sign leases with the nation or be evicted.[7] In 2012, the Senecas ordered a mass eviction of eighty residents of Snyder Beach on the Cattaraugus Reservation, deeming their presence a long-standing "illegal occupation".[7]
The sign comes months after the tribe claims it voided its Thruway right-of-way land agreement with the state. The tribe is charging the state $28,000 a day for travel...so far the bill due is four million and nine dollars.
Originally posted by IntrinsicMotivation
Originally posted by HelenConway
reply to post by IntrinsicMotivation
What would the USA look like if the Native Americans were asked to form a govt - were back in charge ??
What would be different ?
Native Americans have governments. They are called Tribal governments and supersede state authorities on the reservation.
A Brief Overview of Native American Sovereign Nation Status
Native American tribes are political entities with extensive powers of self-government. The political status of tribes actually precedes the formation of the Constitution and the United States.
The first U.S. government treaty with a tribe was negotiated in 1778. Through a series of treaties, laws, Presidential resolutions1, case law, and Supreme Court rulings the U.S. has shaped the scope of tribal sovereignty.
Four kinds of sovereign governments are recognized in U.S. law: the federal government, state government, foreign governments, and tribal governments.
The phrase “government to government” that is sometimes used in civic life refers to this unique status
that Native American tribes hold in relation to the U.S. government.
Tribal governments have self-governance powers that include: the right to form their own government; the
power to make and enforce both civil and criminal laws; the power to tax; the power to establish membership; the
right to license, zone and regulate activities; the power to engage in commercial activity; and the power to exclude
persons (Indian and non-Indian) from tribal territories.
You can read further Here
Should native peoples from North America draw more attention to the native peoples and struggles of the South?
Currently they do seem very fenced off as "Americans", rather than "native" peoples.
Perhaps it's not deliberate, but an inherited discourse, although one ostensibly sees very little activism to counter the impression.
Originally posted by IntrinsicMotivation
reply to post by chachonee
Thank you for pointing that out Chachonee.
So did you agree with the actions of “AIM” and there brief takeover of the BIA in the early 70’s?
I can tell you that when I first learned of this I was inspired. Had I been alive and able, I would have been there myself.
As for Casinos on tribal lands, it is a touchy subject. Gambling is the worst addiction to be victim to. Have you ever lost your whole paycheck in less than 10 minutes? It can leave you in a very dark place wondering how you will make it to your next payday. Why would they put such institutions on tribal lands? Native Americans are highly susceptible to addiction.
Take the Puyallup tribe in Washington State. They have the Emerald Queen Casino, tribal members get benefits of $2,000 a month yet they have nothing to show for it. Wasted on addiction….
It is very sad, and yes there were plenty of non-Indian employees that worked there…..