It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AlphaHawk
reply to post by rickymouse
Or, my friend, they know the severity of Foulbrood and acted accordingly.
Paenibacillus larvae Bacteremia in injection drug users.
Abstract
Paenibacillus larvae causes American foulbrood in honey bees. We describe P. larvae bacteremia in 5 injection drug users who had self-injected honey-prepared methadone proven to contain P. larvae spores. That such preparations may be contaminated with spores of this organism is not well known among pharmacists, physicians, and addicts.
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Corporations are people my friend - the phrase retains its meaning.
Originally posted by wiser3
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by Puresk1lls
Is this constructive or even on-topic?
Look, I admitted my mistake and asked the mods to close the thread.
If it really bothers you that much is it possible for you to ignore it?
S&F
Thanks for this thread! Einstein (I think) supposedly said that if the bees died off mankind would only have a very limited amount of time left on earth! Four years? We cannot do the work that bees do! Bees are essential for the future of mankind!
Learn to ignore those that love to give advice but haven't quite got the meaning of more than one thread covering the same topic being allowed as long as they are in a different forum! Wannabe moderators! You will find that it is usually the same people who give the same advice over and over again! If the moderators choose to close the thread they will do so!edit on 29/5/13 by wiser3 because: (no reason given)
It is obvious from the owner of the bees that he does not understand foulbrood and the action of the state probably saved many nearby hives owned by others. a sample was tested positive by beltsville and this is only one side of the story
I'm not ready to say whether the state had the right to remove and destroy Mr. Ingram's hives but he had ample notice from lab results foulbrood was detected in his equipment.
While it is true that foulbrood does not affect humans, it does affect bees. If he had a dead-out that was robbed he could easily spread (and appears he did) to the rest of his hives and also to feral bee populations.
They don't need a court order because of the state apiary act. He had months of advance warning to get a second opinion from a 3rd party and could have saved the queens and bought new woodware and package bees to maintain his genetics.
“When I was breeding my own bees, before they were killed by Round Up, I had foulbrood in one hive. I left it there all summer, just to see if the other hives would pick it up. They never did.
FOB:
Ok well if I was given a license to practice medicine 40 years ago then I shouldn't have to keep up with newer developments in medicine... No Mr Ingram should have known what he had, it was tested and if Mr Ingram knew anything about the disease then he certainly should have taken action himself. Aaaannd yes he has been teaching.. Selling equipment, potentially contaminating (chances are he has contaminated) other hives. Now if this is the case, and the Dep of ag is on a torching spree how come we haven't heard about anyone else's hives being torched? Why is that I wonder? The laws on these issues are clear, but Terry failed morally because of both his ego, and experience. He is worried about financial losses from selling diseased equipment, as well as his "good standing" in the beekeeping community (which by many accounts of experienced beekeepers he lost his marbles). The last point I would like to make is the irrelevant comparison to the bald eagles... I would like to see any research he's done in terms of documentation, any articles he has published with facts, numbers, and behavioral comparisons that can be validated by someone other than terry the bee god..
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by defcon5
All this tells me is:
1) He obviously knows what Foulbrood is and how to detect it.
2) Regardless of what the owner says, or the authorities say, the evidence has been destroyed so nobody will ever know for sure. It makes the situation appear highly suspect, and also makes this and future incidents open to all kinds of politically-motivated abuse.
Couldn't they have kept even a small sample to effectively shut down any cause for complaint from this guy? I can't see how difficult it would have been. They took a huge amount of his stock - they could not have destroyed it ALL during their lab testing. Give me a break.
Again, quarantined and removed there is no further risk and it's pretty stupid to not engage in the preservation of said evidence until after the ruling is made.