World War III

World War III


It will most probably start in 2014
The death toll will be at least 10 times greater than World War II (600,000,000+)
It will be fought mainly in the China-Burma-India theater.
It will likely end in a nuclear exchange.

This is not a psychic prediction ( I have no abilities in that regard) . It is our historical pattern as a society though - and here is why I make these specific predictions.

The median time interval between a financial disaster and a major war is 6 years. It can be as short as 4 years (like the Panic of 1857 to American Civil War in 1861) or as long as 7 years (like the panic of 1907 led to the First World War in 1914). The pattern is always the same though - a financial debacle leads to war and it seems to take about 6 years for this to happen. I would speculate this time interval is related to how long it takes for the negative financial situation to fully filter down to society and erupt. I also observe that the monetary gains generated by the act of war ends the financial disaster most of the time. This pattern has been true for at least the past three hundred years of western history.

With each major war technology develops that increase our killing power by factors of about 10. For example, the introduction of the rifled musket in the 1850’s increased KIA to over 800,000 in the American Civil war - Machine guns led to 9,000,000 deaths in World War One - advances in air power killed at least 60 million people in World War II (I personally think it was over 80 million) - and so on.

Wars start where the last war was left unresolved. For example, World War Two was an almost inevitable product of the Versailles Treaty after the First World War. The theater of World War Two left most up in the air was the China-Burma-India theater which left many issues moldering.

Wars escalate to the extreme of the weaponry available to the parties. If one side is going to lose and the only weapon they have that might" escalate" to the point of winning is a nuclear weapon it will be eventually used. This is very much a Clausewitz theory of war and the United States and most modern powers do use Clausewitz as a model theorist. You could read “On War” - it is still required reading in military schools.

Mark Twain once said (paraphrasing) that if history doesn’t repeat itself, it sure rhymes.

I am curious what you guys think.

Joe

Not sure why the world would be involved in the China-Burma-India theater, but yes tensions in that area are very high and will likely boil over soon.

However, I seriously doubt we will see nuclear war.

Well it makes sense to me but then again I'll have to assume you're technically and historically correct as I'm a techie musical kind of guy and therefore out of my element. Nice read though. I'll just sit back now and learn

I believe that Asia will be torn apart by a regional conflict like the one you describe as well as smaller conflicts centered around the oil rich islands. In addition, the modernized front of Islam will await the opportune time to sack Israel and cripple the west with terrorism. Nuclear detonations could occur in either of these hot beds which will escalate the conflict further. While initially the Asian front will be about resources and financial crisis. The middle east will be fundamentally a religious war fueled by tyrannical leaders exploiting the populous faith to gain power and riches.

I love the math that you have put into this. Great thread. Star and flag for you. I was also wondering what your research says about civil war. Do you have any facts or figures to speak of on that topic. I understand we have had only one in this country but what about other countries?

Originally posted by JoeP2247
World War III


It will most probably start in 2014
The death toll will be at least 10 times greater than World War II (600,000,000+)
It will be fought mainly in the China-Burma-India theater.
It will likely end in a nuclear exchange.

This is not a psychic prediction ( I have no abilities in that regard) . It is our historical pattern as a society though - and here is why I make these specific predictions.

The median time interval between a financial disaster and a major war is 6 years. It can be as short as 4 years (like the Panic of 1857 to American Civil War in 1861) or as long as 7 years (like the panic of 1907 led to the First World War in 1914). The pattern is always the same though - a financial debacle leads to war and it seems to take about 6 years for this to happen. I would speculate this time interval is related to how long it takes for the negative financial situation to fully filter down to society and erupt. I also observe that the monetary gains generated by the act of war ends the financial disaster most of the time. This pattern has been true for at least the past three hundred years of western history.

With each major war technology develops that increase our killing power by factors of about 10. For example, the introduction of the rifled musket in the 1850’s increased KIA to over 800,000 in the American Civil war - Machine guns led to 9,000,000 deaths in World War One - advances in air power killed at least 60 million people in World War II (I personally think it was over 80 million) - and so on.

Wars start where the last war was left unresolved. For example, World War Two was an almost inevitable product of the Versailles Treaty after the First World War. The theater of World War Two left most up in the air was the China-Burma-India theater which left many issues moldering.

Wars escalate to the extreme of the weaponry available to the parties. If one side is going to lose and the only weapon they have that might" escalate" to the point of winning is a nuclear weapon it will be eventually used. This is very much a Clausewitz theory of war and the United States and most modern powers do use Clausewitz as a model theorist. You could read “On War” - it is still required reading in military schools.

Mark Twain once said (paraphrasing) that if history doesn’t repeat itself, it sure rhymes.

I am curious what you guys think.

Joe

I bet a violent revolution of the poor classes vs. the rich in the U.S.A. happens before a nuke goes off in some WW3 scenario. All that has to happen is for the U.S. President to start acting out on some New World Order Scenario by cutting the power to certain cities in 2014. This would have to only happen if OPEC makes oil only available at say $250.00 a barrel. We U.S. citizens don't know how to live together without energy!

I tell you what generally goes down during a power outage in a major city like San Diego during an 12 hour black out! I saw and participated in convenience store long lines to buy treats. Many purchased alcohol and were in a party mood; I would expect that not to last if it lasted a week or longer!

September 8, 2012, marks the first anniversary of the power blackout in San Diego. At least 1.4 million SDG&E customers were in the dark after a worker at a substation in Yuma, Ariz., accidentally short-circuited the region. The blackout lasted for 12 hours or longer in some areas. Source: www.nbcsandiego.com...

Originally posted by WesternIowaParanormal
I love the math that you have put into this. Great thread. Star and flag for you. I was also wondering what your research says about civil war. Do you have any facts or figures to speak of on that topic. I understand we have had only one in this country but what about other countries?

I am not quite sure what you want to know. I think this is what you are asking.

I think America has actually had two Civil wars ( I think the revolution was really a civil war). And I would point out too that the American Revolution was a world war and was precipitated by an economic failure in England as a result of the French-Indian war costs. That is why the taxes were levied on the colonists.

The only other "civil war" in the revolutionary period was of course the French revolution, again precipitated by financial disaster (and possibly the Little Ice Age) which led to the overthrow of Louis XVI; world war within Europe against France and the rise of Napoleon and then France's wars of conquest.

Is this your question??
Joe

I was wondering if there was any math to support a new civil war in the us like the guy above me mentioned.

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
Not sure why the world would be involved in the China-Burma-India theater, but yes tensions in that area are very high and will likely boil over soon.

However, I seriously doubt we will see nuclear war.

1. India-China war
2. India losing, fires tac nukes at Chinese forces
3. China retaliates, stategic nukes India
4. US and Russia launch limited stategic nuke attack to eliminate Chinese nukes
5. China sees the incoming nukes and launches everything at US and Russia (use em or lose em stategy)
SHTF-TEOTWAWKI-KYAGB

Originally posted by WesternIowaParanormal
I was wondering if there was any math to support a new civil war in the us like the guy above me mentioned.

No and I strongly doubt there is much chance of another civil war in the US.
Joe

Interesting thread OP. After reading your theory I did a quick search and came across this interesting article, detailing some of the recent tension between India and China.

S&F Let me know what you think...

Chinese Incursion

They finally reached their destination and pitched a tent in the barren Depsang Valley in the Ladakh region, a symbolic claim of sovereignty deep inside Indian-held territory.

Apparently the purpose of the mission was symbolic and to test how far China can push India.

Analysts said they were baffled by Beijing's motives, since its actions could force India to move closer to Beijing's biggest rival, the United States.

While I agree that this area is a hot-bed, I still think that the Greater Middle East will be the main theatre of WWIII.

Originally posted by Magister

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
Not sure why the world would be involved in the China-Burma-India theater, but yes tensions in that area are very high and will likely boil over soon.

However, I seriously doubt we will see nuclear war.

1. India-China war
2. India losing, fires tac nukes at Chinese forces
3. China retaliates, stategic nukes India
4. US and Russia launch limited stategic nuke attack to eliminate Chinese nukes
5. China sees the incoming nukes and launches everything at US and Russia (use em or lose em stategy)
SHTF-TEOTWAWKI-KYAGB

edit on 26-5-2013 by Magister because: addition

Well thought out.

I think an even more dangerous scenario is between Pakistan and India. They are both nuclear powers and very much hate each other. Wouldn't Islamic countries take Pakistan's side in this and we are committed by treaty (I believe) to take India's side. If this happens I would hate to even guess which side Russia or China would take.

Just my speculation.
Joe

reply to post by Ace High


It is all true. It is also true that China could implode from within too.

There are a number of scenarios in that part of the world that are very bad.

My prediction however is simply based on history - that the next war always starts where the last one failed to settle matters.

Joe

If what you say comes to pass.....just what do you think the guests under the Himalayas will do?
they have been flying in and out of the ground for centuries there on the india /china border....
These will possibly be the deciding factor in any confrontation, as the aliens have told us no nukes allowed.....

reply to post by stirling


First of all, the US will be destroyed under any kind of alignment you see in a nuclear war -

Pakistan is a mess and will go with whatever winning side there is between Russia, China, or India (India I see as being completely destroyed also, they aren't as strong as China)

Strange, looking at Africa - a bloody mess in even the best of times - but a "prize" for the winner? Don't ever see Africa changing much.

South America and Latin America? Socialist people being made slaves, as usual.

Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by stirling

 

First of all, the US will be destroyed under any kind of alignment you see in a nuclear war -

Pakistan is a mess and will go with whatever winning side there is between Russia, China, or India (India I see as being completely destroyed also, they aren't as strong as China)

Strange, looking at Africa - a bloody mess in even the best of times - but a "prize" for the winner? Don't ever see Africa changing much.

South America and Latin America? Socialist people being made slaves, as usual.

What if the war starts between India and Pakistan (my preferred speculation). What if they initiate launches against each other - can you see what a mess this could be judging on which side Russia and China might come in? Will one or both align with Pakistan. No doubt in my mind, we have to come to India's defense because of treaty commitments and equally no doubt Islamic countries align with Pakistan - this would be one f-ing mess.

I think like the bizarre alliances that tripped WWI - this war will have strange bedfellows.

Joe

There is no World War in 2014. There is no world war in the 21st century. I know there is a world war 3 and world war 4. (The time travelers would know that) It is common sense. I mean if you look at the future. It's okay for any country to have nukes. The US doesn't seem to care anymore. Ever heard of world war 10? Possible too huh? I think Dulce has information about that stuff with regards to a time traveller. (I don't know someone like Commander X.) I mean there a lot of time travelers that Dulce had to deal with. I think, I'm not sure. (Just joking!)

reply to post by JoeP2247


A prophetic source or two I know of [forgotten exactly which one(s)] have asserted that WWIII will be lit off within the next 1-4 years.

I believe . . . as do others studying globalists and their strategies, methods, goals . . .

that the PTB will light off WWIII in their genocidal blood lust to reduce the world's population toward their target of 200-500 million a la UN Agenda 21.

The same treasonous folks have

SET-UP, EFFECTED, STARTED

BOTH ALL THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSES

AS WELL AS

ALL THE WARS.

Ain't they sweet!

reply to post by JoeP2247


I believe Dimitru Duduman has had the most accurate dreams and visions about WWIII:


DIMITRU DUDUMAN’S VISIONS
CHINA AND RUSSIA ATTACK CONUS:

www.handofhelp.com...

There are a number of other similar related docs at the parent link of that page.

Originally posted by JoeP2247

Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by stirling

 

First of all, the US will be destroyed under any kind of alignment you see in a nuclear war -

Pakistan is a mess and will go with whatever winning side there is between Russia, China, or India (India I see as being completely destroyed also, they aren't as strong as China)

Strange, looking at Africa - a bloody mess in even the best of times - but a "prize" for the winner? Don't ever see Africa changing much.

South America and Latin America? Socialist people being made slaves, as usual.

What if the war starts between India and Pakistan (my preferred speculation). What if they initiate launches against each other - can you see what a mess this could be judging on which side Russia and China might come in? Will one or both align with Pakistan. No doubt in my mind, we have to come to India's defense because of treaty commitments and equally no doubt Islamic countries align with Pakistan - this would be one f-ing mess.

I think like the bizarre alliances that tripped WWI - this war will have strange bedfellows.

Joe

edit on 27-5-2013 by JoeP2247 because: (no reason given)