It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by salmonofknowledge
Show me the concrete that can withstand 200 mph winds. If you are above ground, and in the path of a tornado, you are at its mercy. It doesnt matter what the building is made of.
Yes, it does, it also matters what shape the structure is and whether there is an area where such a force can gain a hold. A flat wall is an obstacle which prevents the movement of force until it breaks, a smooth curved surface allows the force to flow over it.
Look at aerodynamics... building a traditional house in a tornado-prone area would be like trying to drive a truck sideways into the wind. You cannot expect anything good to happen with that kind of blunt surface facing such pressure.
Then compare that to driving a low and aerodynamic car forward into a wind, this is the optimum design to allow the force to flow OVER it.
Why are baseballs round and not cube? It's not because they look nicer, it's because they're aerodynamic and the force of air around them is not causing the level of friction it would on a flat surface.
I don't know why people are refuting this, it's very simple science and the kind of thing you should have all learned before you were 12.
Originally posted by Dumbass
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by salmonofknowledge
Show me the concrete that can withstand 200 mph winds. If you are above ground, and in the path of a tornado, you are at its mercy. It doesnt matter what the building is made of.
Yes, it does, it also matters what shape the structure is and whether there is an area where such a force can gain a hold. A flat wall is an obstacle which prevents the movement of force until it breaks, a smooth curved surface allows the force to flow over it.
Look at aerodynamics... building a traditional house in a tornado-prone area would be like trying to drive a truck sideways into the wind. You cannot expect anything good to happen with that kind of blunt surface facing such pressure.
Then compare that to driving a low and aerodynamic car forward into a wind, this is the optimum design to allow the force to flow OVER it.
Why are baseballs round and not cube? It's not because they look nicer, it's because they're aerodynamic and the force of air around them is not causing the level of friction it would on a flat surface.
I don't know why people are refuting this, it's very simple science and the kind of thing you should have all learned before you were 12.
To some agree you both are right. If we can build bunkers of concrete that can withstand a nucleair attack they would be able to withstand a tornado to but only with a firm construction attached to good foundations.
The problem with domes... well if you look at a sphere you cant take half a sphere as dome because the side that would touch the ground is in a 90 degree angle to the ground and so the assumed winds, the basis just works as a flat wall. So we can only use like 10% of a sphere. If we look at the space inside and the space we can actually use we need to use a lot more ground surface to get to a normal surface of dwellings we have today. It is not economical feasible now. The openings in the proposed domes like doors windows or other daylight systems is at this moment not possible to construct in a way it can withstand impacts of debri. All the openings should be automatically closed as air pressure can cause a lot of damage.
Besides this we dont actually know what the wind does at ground level in a strong tornado. Sure most of the time domes couod withstand our assumptions but even asphalt gets ripped of the ground and there is no need to say a flat road IS aerodynamic.
If you would really want to pounder about domes think of futuristic domes that contain whole towns and/or cities that are high enough to make low based cloud systems around them.
You're missing my point. I already stated that things like geodesic domes are far more resistant to wind. The thing is, though, with a tornado, if you are in its direct path, it doesnt matter what you are in. You are at its mercy.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by salmonofknowledge
Show me the concrete that can withstand 200 mph winds. If you are above ground, and in the path of a tornado, you are at its mercy. It doesnt matter what the building is made of.
Yes, it does, it also matters what shape the structure is and whether there is an area where such a force can gain a hold. A flat wall is an obstacle which prevents the movement of force until it breaks, a smooth curved surface allows the force to flow over it.
Look at aerodynamics... building a traditional house in a tornado-prone area would be like trying to drive a truck sideways into the wind. You cannot expect anything good to happen with that kind of blunt surface facing such pressure.
Then compare that to driving a low and aerodynamic car forward into a wind, this is the optimum design to allow the force to flow OVER it.
Why are baseballs round and not cube? It's not because they look nicer, it's because they're aerodynamic and the force of air around them is not causing the level of friction it would on a flat surface.
I don't know why people are refuting this, it's very simple science and the kind of thing you should have all learned before you were 12.
As I said to the other poster, to claim this is just about the wind is naive, or dishonest.
Originally posted by Realtruth
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by salmonofknowledge
Show me the concrete that can withstand 200 mph winds. If you are above ground, and in the path of a tornado, you are at its mercy. It doesnt matter what the building is made of.
Tornado Resistant Dome Buildings in Oklahoma
Enough said!
www.fox23.com...
www.domeofahome.com...
edit on 21-5-2013 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dave_welch
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Now, look at the price compared to a normal house. Most people around here don't exactly have disposable income.
Also, it's not just wind you have to deal with, and F3-F5 tornado can relocate some pretty large and heavy structures. You're dome house may survive the wind, but will it survive a 2 ton automobile, or something heavier hitting it at 150 mph?
Originally posted by dave_welch
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Now, look at the price compared to a normal house. Most people around here don't exactly have disposable income.
Also, it's not just wind you have to deal with, and F3-F5 tornado can relocate some pretty large and heavy structures. You're dome house may survive the wind, but will it survive a 2 ton automobile, or something heavier hitting it at 150 mph?
Originally posted by Another_Nut
Originally posted by dave_welch
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Pick it up ,yes . Roll it over ,yes. Throw it a hundred feet,maybe.
but the danger from flying debris if from small objects , not big ones.
That straw is more dangerous in a nado than a car. ( unless you are in the car)
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by mtnshredder
agaii will repeat .in a tornado the danger of debris is not from a car or big things but by small objects . Like that bat or a brick or a straw.
this is not the wizard of oz . houses and cars dont just get sucked up and spin in the vortex.
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by mtnshredder
you realize you are wrong ?
Why do you think they make tornado shelters above ground and out of concrete if nothing can survive.
im an electrician in okc and I've wired hundreds of above ground shelters.
Now why do you think they do this if concrete shelters wont survive? Don't you think that's a big liability for a company to sell storm shelters than dont shelter you from storms?
Seems you have fallen pray to Mike Morgan and the rest of the tv hype. its ok happens a lot to people around hre especially if you are new.
agaii will repeat .in a tornado the danger of debris is not from a car or big things but by small objects . Like that bat or a brick or a straw.
this is not the wizard of oz . houses and cars dont just get sucked up and spin in the vortex.
Please people do some homework
Originally posted by EdSurly
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by mtnshredder
you realize you are wrong ?
Why do you think they make tornado shelters above ground and out of concrete if nothing can survive.
im an electrician in okc and I've wired hundreds of above ground shelters.
Now why do you think they do this if concrete shelters wont survive? Don't you think that's a big liability for a company to sell storm shelters than dont shelter you from storms?
Seems you have fallen pray to Mike Morgan and the rest of the tv hype. its ok happens a lot to people around hre especially if you are new.
agaii will repeat .in a tornado the danger of debris is not from a car or big things but by small objects . Like that bat or a brick or a straw.
this is not the wizard of oz . houses and cars dont just get sucked up and spin in the vortex.
Please people do some homework
Mtnshredder is not "just wrong". Sorry dude. The reason many many people are building above ground storm shelters....as I alluded to in an earlier post...is because of cost. They're much cheaper than a cellar. And I'll bet you a dollar to a doughnut that if you had a choice of where to be when an EF-5 is bearing down on you it'd be in an underground shelter. At least if you were honest with us that's what you would say. If you truly would pick the above ground shelter...well, I'll be nice and just say your own grandmamma would slap you up side your head.
Are above ground shelters better than nothing at all? Of course, but that's not what's being debated here. What is being debated is what's best. And nothing beats an underground shelter. How many of these above ground shelters that you've wired were re-enforced concrete and how many were the steel plate shelters I talked about earlier? I can answer that with out you; Most are steel plate. And to retort your claim about legal recourse on makers of above ground shelters; Show me ONE SINGLE maker that claims tornado PROOF. They all claim tornado RESISTANCE. Big difference.
Having said all that, when/if I ever build a new home I will probably put in an above ground shelter. The cost effectiveness cant be beat. And that, and that alone is why so many new homes are building them in. Not because they are the best or that they are guaranteed to withstand an EF-5, but because they are the best choice for the money
Originally posted by Another_Nut
Originally posted by EdSurly
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by mtnshredder
you realize you are wrong ?
Why do you think they make tornado shelters above ground and out of concrete if nothing can survive.
im an electrician in okc and I've wired hundreds of above ground shelters.
Now why do you think they do this if concrete shelters wont survive? Don't you think that's a big liability for a company to sell storm shelters than dont shelter you from storms?
Seems you have fallen pray to Mike Morgan and the rest of the tv hype. its ok happens a lot to people around hre especially if you are new.
agaii will repeat .in a tornado the danger of debris is not from a car or big things but by small objects . Like that bat or a brick or a straw.
this is not the wizard of oz . houses and cars dont just get sucked up and spin in the vortex.
Please people do some homework
Mtnshredder is not "just wrong". Sorry dude. The reason many many people are building above ground storm shelters....as I alluded to in an earlier post...is because of cost. They're much cheaper than a cellar. And I'll bet you a dollar to a doughnut that if you had a choice of where to be when an EF-5 is bearing down on you it'd be in an underground shelter. At least if you were honest with us that's what you would say. If you truly would pick the above ground shelter...well, I'll be nice and just say your own grandmamma would slap you up side your head.
Are above ground shelters better than nothing at all? Of course, but that's not what's being debated here. What is being debated is what's best. And nothing beats an underground shelter. How many of these above ground shelters that you've wired were re-enforced concrete and how many were the steel plate shelters I talked about earlier? I can answer that with out you; Most are steel plate. And to retort your claim about legal recourse on makers of above ground shelters; Show me ONE SINGLE maker that claims tornado PROOF. They all claim tornado RESISTANCE. Big difference.
Having said all that, when/if I ever build a new home I will probably put in an above ground shelter. The cost effectiveness cant be beat. And that, and that alone is why so many new homes are building them in. Not because they are the best or that they are guaranteed to withstand an EF-5, but because they are the best choice for the money
Bs .
Below ground shelters are cheap. They can put one in your garage in less than a day
You might drown though once the house falls on you and the rain doesn't stop and you cant get out. Your deal though.
And In reference to the vid showing a semis and trailers...
They did exactly what i said they would do.
Were they moved ,yes . But not far . Just like i said.
Originally posted by EdSurly
Originally posted by Another_Nut
Originally posted by EdSurly
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by mtnshredder
you realize you are wrong ?
Why do you think they make tornado shelters above ground and out of concrete if nothing can survive.
im an electrician in okc and I've wired hundreds of above ground shelters.
Now why do you think they do this if concrete shelters wont survive? Don't you think that's a big liability for a company to sell storm shelters than dont shelter you from storms?
Seems you have fallen pray to Mike Morgan and the rest of the tv hype. its ok happens a lot to people around hre especially if you are new.
agaii will repeat .in a tornado the danger of debris is not from a car or big things but by small objects . Like that bat or a brick or a straw.
this is not the wizard of oz . houses and cars dont just get sucked up and spin in the vortex.
Please people do some homework
Mtnshredder is not "just wrong". Sorry dude. The reason many many people are building above ground storm shelters....as I alluded to in an earlier post...is because of cost. They're much cheaper than a cellar. And I'll bet you a dollar to a doughnut that if you had a choice of where to be when an EF-5 is bearing down on you it'd be in an underground shelter. At least if you were honest with us that's what you would say. If you truly would pick the above ground shelter...well, I'll be nice and just say your own grandmamma would slap you up side your head.
Are above ground shelters better than nothing at all? Of course, but that's not what's being debated here. What is being debated is what's best. And nothing beats an underground shelter. How many of these above ground shelters that you've wired were re-enforced concrete and how many were the steel plate shelters I talked about earlier? I can answer that with out you; Most are steel plate. And to retort your claim about legal recourse on makers of above ground shelters; Show me ONE SINGLE maker that claims tornado PROOF. They all claim tornado RESISTANCE. Big difference.
Having said all that, when/if I ever build a new home I will probably put in an above ground shelter. The cost effectiveness cant be beat. And that, and that alone is why so many new homes are building them in. Not because they are the best or that they are guaranteed to withstand an EF-5, but because they are the best choice for the money
Bs .
Below ground shelters are cheap. They can put one in your garage in less than a day
You might drown though once the house falls on you and the rain doesn't stop and you cant get out. Your deal though.
And In reference to the vid showing a semis and trailers...
They did exactly what i said they would do.
Were they moved ,yes . But not far . Just like i said.
Answer the question posed above. Be honest with us and tell us what you would chose....if I could turn back the clock and put you smack dab in the middle of the Moore tornado...what would YOU chose? The tiny garage shelters are cheap, and 1/10th the size of an above ground shelter or a "normal" sized cellar. Surely you can't actually believe that an above ground shelter is better...be honest with us.
Originally posted by EdSurly
reply to post by Another_Nut
If if's and but's were candies and nuts. Tornado's NEVER happen at night, Oklahoman's are NEVER awakened at 2am by the storm siren. So yea, your right. Out run the tornado and all with be fine.
Originally posted by Another_Nut
Originally posted by EdSurly
reply to post by Another_Nut
If if's and but's were candies and nuts. Tornado's NEVER happen at night, Oklahoman's are NEVER awakened at 2am by the storm siren. So yea, your right. Out run the tornado and all with be fine.
Yea ,ok.
First off tornados VERY RARLY happen at night.
They usually happen during the afternoon and early evening.
I've never been woken up to tornado sirens. Ever.
now I answered your question. And I've proven my points
Nothing I've stated has been refuted
if your ever in town drop a pm and ill show u personally .
Until then you have a tv broadcast and ( and i mean this ) the hype of the weathermen ( and this hype gets worse every year) and i have homes to rewire
eta where are my ifs and buts? I've told you exactly what I do.no ifs or butsedit on 22-5-2013 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)edit on 22-5-2013 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EdSurly
Originally posted by Another_Nut
Originally posted by EdSurly
reply to post by Another_Nut
If if's and but's were candies and nuts. Tornado's NEVER happen at night, Oklahoman's are NEVER awakened at 2am by the storm siren. So yea, your right. Out run the tornado and all with be fine.
Yea ,ok.
First off tornados VERY RARLY happen at night.
They usually happen during the afternoon and early evening.
I've never been woken up to tornado sirens. Ever.
now I answered your question. And I've proven my points
Nothing I've stated has been refuted
if your ever in town drop a pm and ill show u personally .
Until then you have a tv broadcast and ( and i mean this ) the hype of the weathermen ( and this hype gets worse every year) and i have homes to rewire
eta where are my ifs and buts? I've told you exactly what I do.no ifs or butsedit on 22-5-2013 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)edit on 22-5-2013 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)
You never answered my original question...only dodged it. For the record I can't count the times I've been awaken by storm sirens. I remember going to the basement of the post office in my home town as a child in the middle of the night, after we moved to the other side of town on numerous occasions we walked across the street to our neighbors home to get in their cellar in the middle of the night....everyone in their night clothes. I've lived in this town for 10 years now and I've been awakened twice...once at 3am. The most dangerous tornado's are those that strike at night. And their not nearly as rare as you think. But you know all that, your one of those people that can never admit their wrong...for any reason. Prolly an OU fan too huh?
Just kidding with the OU crap And I hope you can continue to run away and hopefully one never bears down on you at night. I truly do.
Originally posted by EdSurly
reply to post by Another_Nut
Thanks for (sort of) answering my question. I'm an Oklahoma fan too.....just not OU, unless their playing TU
I went to college at Oklahoma State, and since you said your age....I also know I've lived in this state longer than you (look at the location in peoples avatars) You can also see I'm SW of you. I've lived in SW Oklahoma my whole life (except for 5 years in Stillwater ) So believe me....we get tornadoes at night, one of the deadliest tornadoes to ever strike this state was at night; The town of Snyder was virtually wiped out. Your in OKC....when your worried about severe weather you look to see what's happening in Altus or Lawton. When were worried we look to see what's happening in Lubbock or Childress. You seem to be like alot of folks I've met from the City....your entire frame of reference seems to be OKC. Try to break that, there's a whole wide world out there.edit on 22-5-2013 by EdSurly because: (no reason given)