It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
So, should we wonder how many other counties may have this problem but are as yet undiscovered?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
So, should we wonder how many other counties may have this problem but are as yet undiscovered?
Originally posted by moxyone
Do note that Bush still beat Kerry in this county 3 to 2.
Computer glitches are just that.
They happen. Now, if every glitch nenefits Bush, that would be very suspicious.
maybe its best to let sleeping dogs lie.
We'd never know unless we kicked this sleeping dog very, very hard. How many other low-population counties turned in thousands of errant votes for Bush, throwing off the entire state's total? Why, we only need 38 such events to turn the vote total in the other direction.
Originally posted by moxyone Now, if every glitch nenefits Bush, that would be very suspicious. maybe its best to let sleeping dogs lie.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
"It's a statistical impossibility that Bush got 8 million more votes than he got last time."
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Of course it works both ways. If we enounter massive error, and a widespread scale, there would be a new brand of hell-to-pay for certain companies.
Originally posted by esdad71 or does it not work both ways???
Originally posted by Valhall
I mean let's stick with facts on this and not some doink's opinion that the outcome was statistically impossible just because he's absolutely dumbfounded by the outcome.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
So, should we wonder how many other counties may have this problem but are as yet undiscovered?