It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Painterz
Originally posted by Wookiep
Weird how a party supposed to be the opposite of Authoritarian seems to want the government to control every aspect of our lives.
Well, is there a liberal party in American politics? I don't think there is. There's two rigid conservative authoritarian parties with barely a hairs breadth between them in terms of their political viewpoints.
Originally posted by Wildbob77
reply to post by LizardSlicks
What rights are blacks denied today?
That is a serious question. In the US, the major civil rights battles were fought in the 1960s by very brave individuals. Now African Americans can purchase any home, anywhere that they can afford. They can go to public schools for free. Affirmative action is alive and well so that any qualified African American can find a job.
Originally posted by Wildbob77
reply to post by olaru12
There was a case recently of a local district attorney, black, who claimed he was stopped for DWB
It was quite interesting.
But seriously, what rights are African Americans denied?
Is it access to schools, public services, housing?
Originally posted by metalholic
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by ButterCookie
You probably brought it on yourself which is what I pick up from your op. Especially since I'm very aware that republicans(conservatives) are most generally racist.
Because the republican party represents the farmer/middle class man (Mainly white) and highly christian religious families.
Religious families are not what they project. Most are racist judgmental and dysfunctional while maintaining that they ar e perfect in public view.
I'm not even religious...let me add that.
Racism exist, I am aware of that. My main argument was that liberals tend to perpetuate racism in general.
Yeah I agree racism exists. But not like it used to. It's more confined and controlled now. When you compare to the past.
Look where most republicans live. Racist countys. Sorry but your having trouble looking inward from the inside.
Your stereotyping and sadly proof that most liberals are not racist is Obama.
I guarantee republicans voted for clinton and didn't obama because obama was black. After all no one wanted another term for bush ie mccain so there you go.edit on 9-5-2013 by metalholic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hefficide
White, liberal, and could not care less about race. Having said that, I do recognize it when I see it and it does still exist - from all points of view. I live in the Atlanta, Georgia area and, sometimes here one can take a step or two and find themselves in an environment that feels much more like 1933 than 2013.
The sooner we all learn to accept and celebrate our differences AND our similarities? The sooner we can take the next step as a civilization.edit on 5/9/13 by Hefficide because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by ButterCookie
You probably brought it on yourself which is what I pick up from your op. Especially since I'm very aware that republicans(conservatives) are most generally racist.
Because the republican party represents the farmer/middle class man (Mainly white) and highly christian religious families.
Religious families are not what they project. Most are racist judgmental and dysfunctional while maintaining that they ar e perfect in public view.
I'm not even religious...let me add that.
Racism exist, I am aware of that. My main argument was that liberals tend to perpetuate racism in general.
Originally posted by Maxatoria
A lot of the slaves were sold to the slavers by their own people so it was blacks selling blacks for profit such as guns and drink as before when various groups went to war they sold each others captives back to each other and the whiteman turned up and offered a better price
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by ButterCookie
I think I've had some discussions here with your friend before. (Some old time members will probably know what I'm talking about).
The Democrats and Republicans of the past are in NO WAY representative of the Democrats and Republicans of today, so bringing up that whole thing is just stupid. The Republicans who freed the slaves went on to become the Democrats of today. Look into your history a little more before you go down that road. All your labels and assumptions make me kind of sick.
I'm white and liberal. Please tell your friend that I'm sorry.
That whole deal about the party's "switching' is more democratic excuses to justify their racist history. The parties never switched; the people did, and not all of them. When LBJ created the War on Poverty to continue the long history of blacks dependency on whites (such as in slavery), it duped black people into voting for the Democratic Party. Traditionally blacks were Republican.
Then...
as blacks blindly migrated over into the Democratic party, racists DixieCrats would not be of the same party as blacks, and flocked to the Republican party. So the Republican Party today now includes the racist-minded former Democrats.
The party's never changed.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by Nevertheless
Originally posted by ButterCookie
The reason why liberalism is even mentioned in the thread/ conversation, is because it is that same liberalism that was pro-slavery and perpetuates the sense of black victim hood, which is unhealthy for the entire world.
How is slavery liberalism?
Please try to understand what you are talking about.
Easily.
Slavery is in institution that goes against the pursuit of liberty- which is a liberal interpretation of the constitution.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
The heart of hte matter is the Democrat party USED to be (generally) pro-slavery.
How did Democrats go from being racist to not being racist?
Nobody has answered that.edit on 10-5-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)