It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who did?
They even said that is what they are doing.
I have asked my self that. And I've looked at the numbers. And I don't think it would be visible at all if it were being done.
And ask yourself what would it look like if they were doing it?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by JrDavis
Who did?
They even said that is what they are doing.
I have asked my self that. And I've looked at the numbers. And I don't think it would be visible at all if it were being done.
And ask yourself what would it look like if they were doing it?
When you get to metals in biological systems. You are no longer talking about the bulk aluminum that people think about when they are drinking form soda pop cans. So once it gets to the aluminum oxide stage, It just forms a plague in your arteries and shuts down life.
The half life of aluminum is decades. I think we should be more focused on removing this toxins from our environments instead of adding them.
Just found this interesting since you're a bulk aluminum believer.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by JrDavis
Just found this interesting since you're a bulk aluminum believer.
I found it interesting too. So much so that I did a little checking about the claims. It's a load of nonsense.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
4 ppm of aluminum in human blood can cause it to colagulate.
Originally posted by WaterBottle
Yes, nothing at all is happening to arctic ice and climate...nothing at all.
Not even going to bother arguing with the people who think climate change isn't happening...keep believing that Koch brother and big oil propaganda, they have the best in mind for the world and humanity.edit on 28-3-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by greatfriendbadfoe
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
You lost me when you referenced richard hoagland aka blowhard extraordinaire (excuse any spelling mistakes)
second
Man made global warming is all based on fear and emotion. It's a bleeding-heart Liberal elitist agenda. There's no scientific evidence for any of it.
"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
“What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multi-decadal natural fluctuation? They’ll kill us probably.”
4PPM is toxic to human consumption.
If someone would of drank that water, It would of been toxic.
You can't avoid it. It composes 7% of the Earth's crust.
There's no debate man. It's no good for you and there's no excuse for putting it in the atmosphere.
Originally posted by CommanderCraCra
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
He's not hated here, he's a well respected member to most people.
Your petty arguments have been hashed out time and time again. They are weak and not well thought out.
It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global
warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.
Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all.
Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis,
according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies.
www.forbes.com...
Originally posted by newcovenant
The only fitting educators are military and maybe some respectable bankers, stock investors and hedge fund operators I guess. They know what this world is all about and are the only ones who should be teaching our children anything...everyone else is an "elitist."
Ask yourself why AGW believers are the minority!???
A very large majority of respondents (89%) indicated that global warming is
happening; in contrast few indicated it isn’t happening (4%), or that they “don’t know”
Respondents who indicated that global warming is happening were asked their views about its primary causes; a large majority indicted that human activity (59%), or human activity and natural causes in more or less equal amounts (11%), were the primary causes. Relatively few respondents indicated that the warning is caused primarily by natural causes (6%), although a substantial minority (23%) indicated they don’t believe enough is yet know to determine the degree of human or natural causation.