It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Lets assume that this agenda is correct, just for argument sake......
Where do the elite benefit? How does the creation of this new world order benefit them MORE than they have now? What's the endgame? This is where it all falls apart....
Their lives would be worse, not better, if this agenda came to fruition...and they didn't get to be the elite by generations of stupid decisions. Therefore, it makes ZERO sense that this would be the goal.
Originally posted by TheBryk
......We should not assume to much one way or the other. The hearts of men are strange. I see some of the current and former military being on the side of the people. Many many will stay with uncle Sam. The population of the US will be split at some percentage closer to the middle than many of us like to think. ...
Originally posted by HerbalJunkie
Originally posted by Gazrok
Lets assume that this agenda is correct, just for argument sake......
Where do the elite benefit? How does the creation of this new world order benefit them MORE than they have now? What's the endgame? This is where it all falls apart....
Their lives would be worse, not better, if this agenda came to fruition...and they didn't get to be the elite by generations of stupid decisions. Therefore, it makes ZERO sense that this would be the goal.
I have been asking myself the same question.
What benefit would it have to crash the world into chaos, instead of just tweaking the flock here and there.
If you slaughter your entire herd, or scare them off, then you have nothing, so this BS about a NWO and hidden total destruction future agenda's is BS.
NWO has been going on for years, but people's ego's don't want to say "hey I am a sheep, part of a flock and being controlled"
You get more meat, fur, milk and a healthier flock if you allow them to graze freely, or at least think they are free.
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
If I were head of a local unit ordered to take down a rebellious city/town, I would cut it off. From anything. No electricity, no food, no nothing.
No need to go in and search every house, as long as you can do a blockade.
Obviously, you would have to find something for outsiders to believe in, so that the inhabitants of that city are the "bad guys".
Keep that up for 2 or 3 weeks and collect the surviving but starved people afterwards. There will be only the most minor of resistance.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by Cosmic911
America has 300 million people. Say 1/5 of of them own guns. Thats 60 million armed people. Now explain to me what that homeland secruity bunch have plans on doing again?
In my my parents old house I could use the woods behind it and get more than halfway across town under dense forest cover. That was in NY not too far from the city. Now think to the rest of the US.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by SonsOfTheMeek
It's very likely that in the near future the FBI, the state, and the local police departments will all be assimilated into the DHS.
Sorry but there's not enough money in the fed budget to pay the saleries of state and local police. Never mind the medical and retirement benifits.
And to those who are thinking NWO. . .
You can't even get the two Koreas to agree with each other.
The Germans are ready to kick Greece and Cyprus to the curb.
NWO=BS
Originally posted by Gazrok
Lets assume that this agenda is correct, just for argument sake......
Where do the elite benefit? How does the creation of this new world order benefit them MORE than they have now? What's the endgame? This is where it all falls apart....
Their lives would be worse, not better, if this agenda came to fruition...and they didn't get to be the elite by generations of stupid decisions. Therefore, it makes ZERO sense that this would be the goal.
Originally posted by SBMcG
reply to post by Char-Lee
In the event of something that cataclysmic, what good are a few hundred thousand Federal rent-a-cops going to be for 330 million people? Certainly they'd be just as screwed...
Originally posted by CallYourBluff
Just when are these sinister plans coming to fruition? Year after year the same nonsense is spouted but nothing ever happens. I never liked the saying "one born every minute" but I guess I have become slightly jaded.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by SBMcG
reply to post by Char-Lee
In the event of something that cataclysmic, what good are a few hundred thousand Federal rent-a-cops going to be for 330 million people? Certainly they'd be just as screwed...
Well they are putting leaders in each town and city. People would do what they are told and if there is a separation and some to be taken to camps, it might be easy if people thought it was for their own good.
It would have to be something that causes an effect of fear in the whole country but not cataclysmic in the whole country just enough to make everyone believe they need federal help.
In our small town there is a new fleet of vans and cars, all white just bought most used and parked in a vacant lot. Right now they are unmarked.
Last year there was sensors added on every road leading out of our area in all directions even the back roads we have several odd electronic things that have been set up entering out town and leaving neighboring town.
I'm still not clear on how 200,000 DHS workers are going to subjugate 100,000,000 + heavily-armed citizens. I don't care what equipment they have, drones, tanks, whatever -- the math simply doesn't work out. A 500-to-1 numerical advantage is insurmountable, imho...