It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by divideandconquer
Well, while you make some very good points, you seem to dismiss black budget as if it doesn't exist. It does.
It also seems as if you believe the official story regarding 9/11, therefore, validating the existence of DHS, the Patriot Act, etc. I don't buy the official story, therefore, question the existence of DHS itself, not to mention, even one bullet that they order.
My point is that the government has given us no reason to trust them, and evidence is not exactly readily available to the common man, so please point me to this evidence that lays it all out, explaining the need to order one hollow point bullet, let alone millions or billions.
Originally posted by divideandconquer
Did they order any hollow points? If so, why?
Originally posted by divideandconquer
reply to post by flyswatter
no
Originally posted by divideandconquer
Wait, are you saying that it contains the violence to the target? I've heard that argument before, however, I also know that hollow-points rip apart the insides of its target, as if you put that person's organs in a blender. Not exactly the most humane way to shoot someone.
Although the DHS has attempted to explain its mammoth purchase of ammunition by claiming the bullets are being acquired in bulk to save money and that they are for training purposes only, this has been disputed by reputable voices such as former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month, “We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps.” Hollow point bullets are more expensive than regular firing range bullets, therefore the DHS’ explanation that it is buying huge quantities in bulk to “save money” doesn’t make sense.marketdailynews
So to all the people saying "this is much ado about nothing", I am begging you to please explain the intent of the DHS..
Thanks,
Pax
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by flyswatter
Okay, I have read this thread almost in it's entirety. Here is what should scare the hell out of you and if it doesn't maybe you would be inclined to tell us why!
The govt. purchased 1.6 billion rounds of ammo and has plans to purchase another 360,000...Before you get upset with me for repeating the obvious, has anyone here bothered to question the "type" of ammo acquired
by DHS?
These are hollow point bullets people! Not your standard bullet by far! Hollow points have one purpose; to do as much damage possible after entering it's target, it actually mushrooms inside the victim.
When DHS was asked,about the amount and type of ammo purchased here is how they responded.
Although the DHS has attempted to explain its mammoth purchase of ammunition by claiming the bullets are being acquired in bulk to save money and that they are for training purposes only, this has been disputed by reputable voices such as former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month, “We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps.” Hollow point bullets are more expensive than regular firing range bullets, therefore the DHS’ explanation that it is buying huge quantities in bulk to “save money” doesn’t make sense.marketdailynews
So to all the people saying "this is much ado about nothing", I am begging you to please explain the intent of the DHS..
Thanks,
Pax
Originally posted by kenpachi7
You hear this every month basically, it's not gonna happen
Are these two events related?
Nasdaq halts all trading
www.abovetopsecret.com...
by WeBrooklyn
started on 8/22/2013 @ 02:34 PM
Bernanke's getting out of Dodge?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
by MidnightTide
started on 4/21/2013 @ 09:47 PM
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will miss the annual Jackson Hole monetary policy symposium this year due to a scheduling conflict, skipping the prestigious event for the first time since taking the helm of the central bank in 2006.
The conference, held in late August in the splendor of the Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, draws top central bankers from around the world. Bernanke's absence would mark the first time in 25 years that a Fed chairman has not attended.
A Fed spokeswoman, responding to a Reuters enquiry, said the chairman was currently not planning to attend because of a personal scheduling conflict.
www.reuters.com...
Jackson Hole economic summit in Wyoming 2013
Thursday 29 August to Saturday 31 August 2013