It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by orionthehunter
How about instead of taxing the crap out of people's life long savings we just instead put a 90 percent tax on the income of everyone proposing new taxes to solve all the problems.
Sorry for the rant but this idea of making things better by stealing from people who have been working all their lives to save money for retirement just makes me
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by sonnny1
They don't want to fix the problems that would put them out of a job, reduce their power the more problems they create means "job security".
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by poet1b
It is a scam, and the sooner we get rid of it the better off we will be. Government has no place in providing it anyway, let me decide what I want to invest in.
As to those who have paid all their lives into it, they should be able to receive it until they die. But there should be a cut off point - and yes, I will be one of those who will have paid into it for decades but won't receive anything.
(I feel it won't be around when I am of an age to receive it anyway as it is unsustainable)
It’s now up to 21 states. In 21 states, they’ve passed a law that says that taxes withheld from your paycheck, for the state, can be kept by the company. Now, every employer doesn’t get this windfall — you have to have to get a deal from the government to do it — 2,700 big companies, every big company you’ve ever heard of, General Electric, Procter and Gamble, Deutsche Bank, you name it, they’ve got these deals, where they get to keep the taxes. Billions of dollars are diverted this way. You know the best thing for the companies about this?
The workers don’t know
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by sonnny1
Because we Amerikans do so love to elect scapegoats so we don't have to take responsiblity for anything.
IMO.
Entitlement programs are supposed to cost more money than other programs. There is nothing strange about this.
The reason entitlement programs have been more costly than before and put us heavier into deficit spending, is because fewer americans work and they are low paying jobs thus they cannot contribute their fair share of deposits anymore.
And what about the corporate bailouts? Bush had spent $700 billion and Obama about $5 trillion.
In a capitalist society you are not supposed to bailout any business
Soon the day of Reckoning will be at hand for Every American.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
So to prove i like people I just have to steal money from the rich folk and give it to the poor folks!!!!
Really do need to stop that nonsense.
at least direct your outrage at the real problem, you purposely over look the real source of the problem, to scape goat the poor.
you could at lest try to hide your disgust of the poor, where is your condemnation of the 1600 big businesses keeping taxes collected from workers?
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by poet1b
It is a scam, and the sooner we get rid of it the better off we will be. Government has no place in providing it anyway, let me decide what I want to invest in.
As to those who have paid all their lives into it, they should be able to receive it until they die. But there should be a cut off point - and yes, I will be one of those who will have paid into it for decades but won't receive anything.
(I feel it won't be around when I am of an age to receive it anyway as it is unsustainable)
You are such a peach - looking out for number one. Frightened much.
(forgive me - I get so tired....)
Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by sonnny1
you blame the poor and ignore the tax route for the wealthy offshoring income to "avoid tax" liabilities,
and corps keeping collected taxes.
this is called ignoring the problem so you can blame those you dislike
xploder
Originally posted by neo96
Social programs destroy jobs and wealth and the scapegoat is the topic of this thread.
Party true, the federal reserve printing presses, and once upon a time in Amerika we were a producer where we are nothing but the worlds largest consumer.
And no they never have contributed their fair share, the big 3 should have never been created in the first place because from their inception they could never be funded-self sustained and to feed that monster more regulations,more printing and everything else done to "help" people has compounded those problems.
And people think take 1% money is going to solve anything.
Give me a second someone actually saying Obama spent more than Bush is shocking.
In a capitalist society you don't baliout business or people thus we do not live in a "capitalist society".
No they don't destroy jobs and wealth, they simply reduce the profit margin of business.
And we can thank the wall street investors and speculators and the big banks for their enormous lust for new markets and the cheap labor that comes with that.
I am no fan of the federal reserve or private central banking. I am also no fan of gold standard nonsense. I believe in public central banks and commercial banks paying interest to the government.
Socialism implies mixed economy and communism is public economy 100%. In america everything is private thus we have capitalism, but is the liberal type.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
So to prove i like people I just have to steal money from the rich folk and give it to the poor folks!!!!
Really do need to stop that nonsense.