It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kharron
This is awesome, I'm really happy to see news like this. For too long they've lived in loftiness and apart from those who believe in them. I'm not religious but I have a good feeling about this guy.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by woodwytch
Surely the Head Of The Catholic Church in the shape of the new Pope should be focusing on cleaning-up the depravities of the church he leads (of which there are many) ... instead of wasting time on his 'simple' clothes and furniture.
How do you know he isn't doing that? I'm sure he's capable of doing many things at the same time. And he's only been in office a few days. Give him some time to implement changes.
Originally posted by woodwytch
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by woodwytch
Surely the Head Of The Catholic Church in the shape of the new Pope should be focusing on cleaning-up the depravities of the church he leads (of which there are many) ... instead of wasting time on his 'simple' clothes and furniture.
How do you know he isn't doing that? I'm sure he's capable of doing many things at the same time. And he's only been in office a few days. Give him some time to implement changes.
You seem to have missed the point I was making ... it's not about the number of changes he is/will make ... it's about the priority he places said changes in and to me the 'chair and clothes' are trivalities (fluff) ... IMHO he would make more of an impact if he began with the 'BIG' stuff not the 'fluffy' stuff that seems to have made the news ... the importance you yourself put on it that prompted you to start this thread being my case in point !
Woody
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
Originally posted by woodwytch
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by woodwytch
Surely the Head Of The Catholic Church in the shape of the new Pope should be focusing on cleaning-up the depravities of the church he leads (of which there are many) ... instead of wasting time on his 'simple' clothes and furniture.
How do you know he isn't doing that? I'm sure he's capable of doing many things at the same time. And he's only been in office a few days. Give him some time to implement changes.
You seem to have missed the point I was making ... it's not about the number of changes he is/will make ... it's about the priority he places said changes in and to me the 'chair and clothes' are trivalities (fluff) ... IMHO he would make more of an impact if he began with the 'BIG' stuff not the 'fluffy' stuff that seems to have made the news ... the importance you yourself put on it that prompted you to start this thread being my case in point !
Woody
The symbolism is important - he sends an immediate and very clear message with a few simple choices
And - it has only been a few days. Give him a chance to unpack his toothbrush, find his way to the cafeteria and get his new newspaper delivered
Rome wasn't built in a day
:-)
Originally posted by Senduko
Be wary of the man who bearing gifts
Its quite stunning how this pope appeals to the masses...
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by MamaJ
He sounds like the perfect deception to me.
The guy is 76 years old .. has one lung ....
So far .. I like him.
The Vatican's budget is around 300-325 million dollars a year, they don't get close to one billion, let alone billions.
Why would the Vatican, a corporation that rakes in billions, elect a Pope that would adversely affect their profit?
A couple of questions. You mention that he is "the" Anti-Christ. What Biblical prophecies does he fulfill that leads you to believe that? Do you believe that he is the Anti-christ that heralds the timeline ending the world?
I do believe that this guy is the so-called "antichrist", a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Do you believe that the amount of donations to Rome is the main consideration for the Cardinals? Really? Why did they choose Benedict XVI then?
Why would the Vatican, a corporation that rakes in billions, elect a Pope that would adversely affect their profit?
So, I guess the prophecy was no good then. And he's not expected to change everything for the better. He's expected to teach the truth of the Church that was received two millenia ago.
It's the perfect set up, there's a guy that fits the prophecy perfectly with cardinal Peter, then they switch it up on us and pick another guy that's supposed to radically change everything for the better
Now I get it, it's not Francis that you don't like. Any Pope, Bishop, or Priest is bad. that's seems a little extreme. Sorry, I can't go with you that far.
In my eyes he is only a puppet and I can't see any good coming from him or anyone else affiliated with the Vatican.
Originally posted by tadaman
Exactly he has been pope for some DAYS now and you guys are getting all enamored with him because he does this little show.
Now you know how I feel. This MAN is just as corrupt as the others.
He must be God....!
You are a very wise person.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Why would the Vatican, a corporation that rakes in billions, elect a Pope that would adversely affect their profit? They wouldn't! If this guy isn't going to go along with their plan he would have never been elected pope, plain and simple.
So what if he changed some furniture around? In my eyes he is only a puppet and I can't see any good coming from him or anyone else affiliated with the Vatican.
He's now the head of one of, if not THE most corrupt business(es) on Earth. If people honestly believe that he's somehow going to change everything around, they have another thing coming in my opinion.
It's the perfect set up, there's a guy that fits the prophecy perfectly with cardinal Peter, then they switch it up on us and pick another guy that's supposed to radically change everything for the better. I do believe that this guy is the so-called "antichrist", a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Don't be fooled!
edit on 23-3-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)