It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
God is therefore taking an unnecessary risk by bestowing Free Will on its subjects, as that privilege can lead to widespread pain, suffering and death.
at the end of the day it is pointless. Why? Because, before a creation is made, God would be aware of ALL decisions such a creation could make.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
If Free Will does indeed exist, there is very little beauty in it. Sure, on face value it seems generous that God would allow his creations to make their own decisions, but at the end of the day it is pointless. Why? Because, before a creation is made, God would be aware of ALL decisions such a creation could make. This includes the ability for creations to take part in behaviour that is detrimental to itself, its environment and other creations. God is therefore taking an unnecessary risk by bestowing Free Will on its subjects, as that privilege can lead to widespread pain, suffering and death.
People often use the following rebuttal: "but if there is no Free Will then we are just robots!". What these people fail to realise is that even with Free Will, they are still robots - only more advanced robots.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by AQuestion
Of course people have free will and are responsible for their choices. None of us know what we are destined for.
But our path has already been chosen.
God is omnipotent and God made the world. Therefore he knew every decision people would ever make and how they are going to end up. He could have designed the world where everyone followed him or nobody did or some of the people did.
Either way, he came up with a design, looked at it, and said it is good. Although we don't know the outcomes he most certainly does. Every sin by every person committed on earth is part of Gods design.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by AQuestion
But our path has already been chosen.
God is omnipotent and God made the world. Therefore he knew every decision people would ever make and how they are going to end up. He could have designed the world where everyone followed him or nobody did or some of the people did.
Either way, he came up with a design, looked at it, and said it is good. Although we don't know the outcomes he most certainly does. Every sin by every person committed on earth is part of Gods design.
Originally posted by g0dhims3lf
reply to post by RobertF
Yes this is true, what should have been said was, "Our path is known" not "Our path is chosen". Not that I agree with either but one doesn't negate free will only how one perceives time. An argument I read somewhere said that we live within time, while God lives outside time. We live linearly in the present with what was, and what will be. God lives in the eternal present and sees everything at once.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
If Free Will does indeed exist, there is very little beauty in it. Sure, on face value it seems generous that God would allow his creations to make their own decisions, but at the end of the day it is pointless. Why? Because, before a creation is made, God would be aware of ALL decisions such a creation could make. This includes the ability for creations to take part in behaviour that is detrimental to itself, its environment and other creations. God is therefore taking an unnecessary risk by bestowing Free Will on its subjects, as that privilege can lead to widespread pain, suffering and death.
People often use the following rebuttal: "but if there is no Free Will then we are just robots!". What these people fail to realise is that even with Free Will, they are still robots - only more advanced robots.
Originally posted by RobertF
Originally posted by g0dhims3lf
reply to post by RobertF
Yes this is true, what should have been said was, "Our path is known" not "Our path is chosen". Not that I agree with either but one doesn't negate free will only how one perceives time. An argument I read somewhere said that we live within time, while God lives outside time. We live linearly in the present with what was, and what will be. God lives in the eternal present and sees everything at once.
If you cant agree with both, then you negate both. Which in turn negates your claim of free will.
It doesn't matter that "god" lives out side of time as we precive it, if he knows the out come then that is pre-destination.
It is only free-will if he witness it happening but does not know the out come.edit on 15-3-2013 by RobertF because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Akragon
IF free will didn't exist... You would look around and see exactly the opposite of what you see in this world...
Everyone is free to make their own choices...
IF God can see all the possible outcomes of a person's life... and still lets people make bad choices... Either God has a plan, which is for each person to learn by his own free will... OR God is sadistic and cruel...
Originally posted by AQuestion
Dear Dark Ghost,
So many assumptions, do you have children? I raised three, I often knew what they were thinking; but, never exactly how it would turn out. Did that mean they had no free will? You seem to be saying that if God knows what choices you might make that you have no free will. I reject people's attempts to claim they are not responsible for their choices. You can choose to rape or not to rape, you are responsible for the choice you make, not God. The fact that you have an opportunity to do something, still makes the choice your responsibility. You define who you are by your choices, don't blame God and don't blame the Devil, take some responsibility and then do that which is right. That is not being a robot, that is being a better you.
Originally posted by akushla99
Absolute and unmitigated tripe...
A99
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Originally posted by akushla99
Absolute and unmitigated tripe...
A99
Absolute and unmitigated tripe...
(See what I did there?)
Maybe you could enlighten us with some of your wisdom, or at least explain why you considered the OP "absolute and unmitigated tripe" ?