It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
3. Camera Details
The camera was based on the NTSC System with a diaphragm set at the maximum of 1.8. Canon DM-GRI-A. It's a 3CCD 20x optic 100x with a tele-converter mounted on a 58mm adapter. Tele-objective is a Sony brand vci hgd 1758 model lens, x 1.7.
I Googled for more info on the camera but all it seems to generate is links to this event.
Lets look at all the problems from the view of a photographer.
A lens does not perform at its best (sharpness) at its widest aperture f1.8 in this case.
Zoom lenses tend to be softer (not as sharp) as prime (fixed focal length) lenses
Digital zoom DEGRADES an image, any photographer will tell you that.
A tele-converter will DEGRADE an image also.
Shooting at night also creates problems with image quality low light and small sensor size also problems using auto focus as it hunts to find something to focus on which can be seen on the video.
So we have a night time low light digital zoomed image degraded by a teleconverter not the best way to document an event.
Looking at other Canon cameras with a similar spec they used 3ccd chips which were 1/4" chips each of 250,000 -320,000 pixels, good at that time but not now.
edit on 14-3-2013 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Firstly, this "Fresh look 2007-2009" has already been posted here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Secondly, it has already been proven to be of a boat on the water here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It's not real, it's not a UFO, we can put this Turkey case to rest once and for all.
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
reply to post by wmd_2008
Thats rubbish man.... youve just blurred out the boat picture to make it look like the ufo.
talk about manipulating evidence to make your point.It shrieks of desperation.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
I agree and he only compares 1 day of the footage. He forgot the other 25 days.
Even if he is right and it does not match to me, then he still has 25 more days to debunk.
Originally posted by ProfessorT
I still believe this is one of the best, perhaps in the top five of all time UFO and alien cases. The videographer captured something which quite frankly is unexplainable no matter what alternative explanations people put forward they just don't match up. I've heard the cruise ship explanation which doesn't make sense, if this was a cruise ship it would have been obvious from the outset and surely you would have been able to see other lights in the video from windows and cabins, etc. Also, I have yet to read anyone debunking the aliens which were found in the enhanced footage and the various studies carried out by experts in Turkey and other countries.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
This will run and run, and the sceptics have nothing.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Hello,
During 2008 at the time some of the video was taken some of the Turkish media did a report. Here you see Roger Leir and some of the witnesses speaking at the same time. They did not wait several years later.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
If we can find someone who speaks fluent Turkish we can conduct an interview with Murat Yalcin. I know how to get in touch with him.
Anyone here that can speak Turkish want to help translate?
Originally posted by ArMaP
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
If we can find someone who speaks fluent Turkish we can conduct an interview with Murat Yalcin. I know how to get in touch with him.
Anyone here that can speak Turkish want to help translate?
Did you see this post?As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
edit on 14/3/2013 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)
The point is that there is nothing to debunk. There is absolutely no evidence that this a flying anything. None.
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
reply to post by CigaretteMan
The point is that they havent debunked any of it. Not by a long shot. And the boat thing is just plane weak.
This will run and run, and the sceptics have nothing.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
The point is that there is nothing to debunk. There is absolutely no evidence that this a flying anything. None.
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
reply to post by CigaretteMan
The point is that they havent debunked any of it. Not by a long shot. And the boat thing is just plane weak.
This will run and run, and the sceptics have nothing.