It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lacrimaererum
You thread title is extremely misleading and irresponsible.
I would also like to ask who have you helped through chemotherapy that makes you against it? Have you helped someone through chemotherapy or are you simply against it because of what you have read about it?
Will oncologists submit to chemotherapy if they are diagnosed? Well, in 1986, McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, one of the largest and most esteemed cancer treatment centers in the world, surveyed 64 oncologists to see how they would personally respond to a diagnosis of cancer.
The results will blow your mind. Are you sitting down? Of the 64 oncologists surveyed, 58 said that... ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members due to the fact that the drugs dont work and are toxic to ones system! That's right, 91% of oncologists will not take chemo!!
Jeff Rense interview Ty Bollinger
“Ty, isn't chemotherapy a proven scientific treatment?”
The answer is YES, it is! It has been scientifically proven to fatally poison several hundred thousand people each and every year. Did you know that the overall success rate for most cancers treated with the chemotherapy is a paltry 3%? In other words . . .
“Chemo has a 97% fatality rate”...
The sad fact is that chemo is not only legal, but it is readily accepted by most oncologists as one of the best treatments for cancer. At least that's what the typical oncologist tells the cancer patient....
But in 1986, McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, one of the largest and most esteemed cancer treatment centers in the world, surveyed 64 oncologists to see how they would personally respond to a diagnosis of cancer. The results will blow your mind. Are you sitting down? Of the 64 oncologists surveyed, 58 said that...
“ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members due to the fact that the drugs don’t work and are toxic!”
That means that 91% of the oncologists surveyed would not submit themselves to the same protocols that they prescribe to their patients! Is it just me, or does this seem hypocritical to you? I believe that this is not only hypocritical, but it borders on being criminal! They know that chemo will kill more patients than it will help, but they continue to tell their patients that it is their "best treatment option." What a damnable lie!
Chemo Fatalities
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Tell you what...unfortunately, odds are very good that either you or a close loved one will be diagnosed with cancer. Get back to us at that point, and let us know your choices and how they worked out for you.
Cuz quite frankly, unless you have been in that situation, all of your 'opinions' are rectally sourced. Trust me on that.
Originally posted by Shaded27
My dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, they opened him up and unfortunately couldn't do anything for him.
They gave him 8 months to live.
3 years later he is still fighting and is actually improving. The cancer hasn't spread, his pancreas is still a mess but doesn't appear to be cancerous any more, the doc's are baffeled.
He has done 3 things that might be the reason for his survival. He has consumed a juice and veg mix everyday, he had also been taking a thing called "black salve" and one other thing wich unfortunately we cannot discus on here.
And a more recent product that may help is "turkey tail mushroom"
I would recommend the anove combo to anybody with terminal cancer. And never believe the "terminal" part
There are cures out there, but the drug companies don't want people to know about them.
He did do the usual treatments for the first 6 months but they were making him very sick. Pancreatic cancer victims don't have a good survival rate, I think it's something like 90 + per cent don't survive 12 months and his was very advanced and aggressive so he stop traditional treatments and turned to more alternative treatments.
We think it was a combination of juice, the black salve and the herb that is not to be spoken about on ATS.
It could also have been a miracle.
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by Rezlooper
Seems like you are vilifying the medical industry. People often forget who diagnosed the problem in the first place, it would have stayed hidden and ended up with bad result.
Hopefully there is no regression when diet is changed back.
Homeopathy was introduced into the USA by Hans Burch Gram in 1825 and many German immigrants took to the system. Constantine Hering, a graduate of Leipzig University, founded the first American school of homeopathy in Allentown, Pennsylvania in 1835 with instruction in German. After six years, it was replaced by him with the Homeopathic Medical College in Philadelphia. In 1844, licensing standards were put together by the newly founded American Institute of Homeopathy. The AIH also was the clearinghouse for the provings of North American native plants and other new remedies. Later the American Medical Association (AMA) would form in reaction to growing popularity of homeopathy as a business guild in order to protect the interests of its physicians with the help of the pharmacies who supplied calomel and the like.
The formal counterattack against homeopathy grew slowly as the system became more apparent through translations and increasing practitioners who used sweet tasting globules instead of foul preparations. In 1842 the New York State Medical Society ruled that homeopathy was a form of quackery. The members believed that the success of homeopathy was only because of their poor marketing and public relations and decided that medical education needed a revamp as long as they could get rid of the homeopathic community. The pretentiously named sugar pills under the guise of pharmacy shouldn t allow homeopaths immunity as practitioners of other medical system. This is the groundwork that the AMA was formed on in 1847. In 1856 the AMA banned any discussion of homeopathic medical theory in their journals and threatened expulsion of any doctor who even consulted with a homeopath. You were expelled even if you were married to a practicing homeopath. Even though the official stance is that they were trying to eliminate quackery, the records show that their main target was homeopathy, the only other major force in American medicine.
The cholera epidemic of 1849 was a resounding success for homeopathy claiming a 97% cure rate by the Cincinnati physicians in over a thousand cases. The medical establishment openly admitted it had no cure and went through major excuse production to cover their beliefs. Housewives picked up Hering s The Homeopathic Domestic Physician along with a homeopathic kit with numbered remedies and understood how to protect her family without a knowledge of physiology or chemistry. The New York Times, powerful politicians, and business interests all supported homeopathy during the peak of popularity in the 1870s and 80s. The yellow fever epidemic in the South during the 1870s was treated successfully and the homeopaths left their mark in recommending sanitary corrections in the water systems. Hundreds of homeopathic hospitals, clinics, insane asylums, nursing homes, orphanages and schools were in operation.
Don't know much about dealing with prostate cancer, do you? Anyone who's been there would think it was pretty funny...all things considered.
Originally posted by Murgatroid
FYI the "rectally sourced" comment pretty much destroys all of your credibility.
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Chemo has a 97% fatality rate and 91% of oncologists will not even use it on THEMSELVES...
And you have the gall to call the OP a liar and accuse HIM of being extremely misleading and irresponsible?
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
Just be careful and make sure he's getting checked out by the doctor regularly. People have died by going the natural-only route.
Originally posted by Ghost375
I've yet to see a single study that shows how many people survive with just natural interventions.
And no one is accusing the OP of lying.
Originally posted by lacrimaererum
You thread title is extremely misleading and irresponsible. It is simply a lie.