It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by broctune
Originally posted by twitchy
Originally posted by Guyfriday
reply to post by twitchy
I did see your RATS thread, and I stay by my assumtion that GHWB and the IMC were behind this.
Absolutely.
Have you seen the film Dark Legacy by John Hankey? It's on Netflix now if you have a subscription there, it goes into a piece by piece expose of the Bush connections to the JFK assasination. There's aslo a picture floating somewhere that shows GHWB outside of the book depository, don't know if it's him or not, but the resemblance is uncanny and that smirk is defining IMO.
I've seen that film too. I also think GHWB was behind the JFK assassination.
Originally posted by Cauliflower
Here are two picture links of Oswald and Lay.
ts3.mm.bing.net...
64
ts4.mm.bing.net...
edit on 22-2-2013 by Cauliflower because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rising Against
reply to post by OutonaLimb
no smoke from the gun, no visible blood, no agonising and prolonged cries that are
associated with gunshot wounds to the stomach,
No visible smoke? Well, naturally - I assume you've not seen the footage btw..
No blood? Wrong, obviously.
No agonizing and prolonged cries? Wrong, again.
Oswald clearly cried out in pain, and could be heard crying out immediately as the shot's were fired and in the aftermath too. If you didn't know this, you've trying to debate without even seeing the shooting take place as these cries are clear.
In images after the shooting, we can clearly see a man in pain too, and also some blood.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/lt51264293.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/pa51264326.jpg[/atsimg]
horns coinciding with the beginning of the action etc. etc. but it's all real because moderators
heff and rising say so.
Yes, bring our moderatorship into thing's. That'll thoroughly help your case and bring forth credibility.
Also, there was a lot of people there. I think it's pretty obvious why the horn was being honked. Come on now, can we please use a little bit of common sense here?
i never did hear you comment on cultos excellent and compelling thread linked in
my above post. do you discount completely all the evidence amassed supporting
his conclusions, or are you just unwilling to entertain this real and present possibility?
No offence, but I'll be wasting my time. I have genuine research to continue in regards to this case.
JFK was shot.. deal with it people. It happened. Elvis is dead too, as is Diana, as is Tupac, as is Michael Jackson etc. etc. People in high positions are still people, and they also succumb to death just like you and me. Welcome to life.
or are you gatekeeping, raising agent? nice to see you made it to moderator.
Oh, a personal attack. I didn't have to wait long for that at all. Congratulations, you just lost the debate and all credibility by delving to the tactics of a child in primary school by going down the route of agent calling as opposed to continuing this discussion like the rational adults we're both supposed to be. But, despite this, I'll continue nonetheless..
do you deny any likeness between a young ron paul and lee harvey oswald
from the photos above?
Yes, and the notion that they're the same person is utterly ridiculous too.
Period.
You also claim in your post that JFK and also Mary Pinchot were not shot. Your credibility is vastly escaping here. Sorry, but it just is. I'm here for genuine, serious research. Not that.edit on 21-2-2013 by Rising Against because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by broctune
It boggles the mind how people can think the Kennedy assassination wasn't staged/hoax, but think Oswald getting shot was totally legit. They're two scenes in the same movie.
Originally posted by Flyingclaydisk
Originally posted by broctune
It boggles the mind how people can think the Kennedy assassination wasn't staged/hoax, but think Oswald getting shot was totally legit. They're two scenes in the same movie.
Why does this 'boggle your mind'? It shouldn't. Like I said a couple pages back, it is my opinion that LHO was not supposed to have been captured, in the grander scheme of the JFK plot. That LHO was in fact captured by authorities before he could be 'disposed of' (as planned) presented a very clear and present danger to someone, and it required immediate action at the first opportunity. Who that someone was is unclear to be sure, but the urgent and almost 'at any cost' method in which LHO was killed is evidence of this.
By looking at the historical films one can almost imagine the conversation which took place leading up to the event...(hypothetically) "This just can't happen! Oswald wasn't supposed to get caught! We've got to do something about this; we've got to to take this guy out, and right now! He knows way, way, too much! He'll sing like a bird if they lean on him. Who can we send in there to do it? Let's send Ruby, he's a loose cannon anyway, so he's disposable..."
So what if they did "lean" on LHO, what could he have told them? Oh sure, he might have been able to tell them a name or two and that would have taken a few folks down, but I don't think that was the real fear. I think the real fear was much bigger than that. Say, for example, LHO said (again, hypothetically)... "They just told me to fire from the window in the general direction of the car...they didn't tell me to try to hit anything. It was too far. ...", well, now wouldn't that have changed things! Then the "they" becomes exponentially more important.
You see, in my humble opinion LHO was a pawn in a much larger conspiracy. If LHO was dead "they" could always confine the event to one shooter, but alive he might have easily revealed a much large web of conspirators.
So, to your 'scenes from the same movie' analogy, I guess I disagree. I believe what you saw was two scenes from two different movies, the latter of which was a very hastily made 'B' movie and the former a full length blockbuster screen play.
Just my observation.
edit on 2/22/2013 by Flyingclaydisk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by broctune
reply to post by OutonaLimb
Pretty good stuff. Especially about Oswald's left arm being in the way of the shot. The Mary Pinchot Meyer stuff is interesting too. Thank you.
then exited unrecognized in full view of witnesses.
We all repeatedly forget a simple fact - Oswald became one of the most recognizable faces in America at the point of his death.
He could hide nowhere.. and it's implausible to assume he could/would.