It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logical7
how you say that, Jesus pbuh said "before Abraham was, I am" not "before Adam was, I am"
or you would quote
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Originally posted by Logical7
the objection i have is, "in the beginning there should be God"
Originally posted by Logical7
and you already acknowledged that Jesus pbuh is a created being.
Originally posted by Logical7
If you agree that he is not divine then we can agree.
Originally posted by Joecroft
reply to post by logical7
Originally posted by Logical7
how you say that, Jesus pbuh said "before Abraham was, I am" not "before Adam was, I am"
or you would quote
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Originally posted by Logical7
the objection i have is, "in the beginning there should be God"
This is where the confusion lies, When Jesus was created, He was the beginning!; in the verse above (John 1:1) Jesus is the Word. God had no beginning, because He is eternal. And the end part of John1:1 is more accurately translated as, “and the Word was Devine’, or in some translations “the Word was a God.”
Originally posted by Logical7
and you already acknowledged that Jesus pbuh is a created being.
Yes He was created, but He is also our Co-creator, with the Father God, from the beginning.
Proverbs 8:22:36
Originally posted by Logical7
If you agree that he is not divine then we can agree.
He is not a Man; He is not a Prophet, in the manly sense of the word, and neither is He the Eternal Father God.
He is The Son of God, set apart by the Father, from the very beginning of Time, and He is our Co-creator with the Father, which makes Him Devine as well.
- JC
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
No. The manager of this universe has a name Source Entity. It has been human many times; playing both sides of the the fence, as Jesus IT sacraficed Itself to itself. . As the Dali Llama he fled his own people to hide in India watching his gold hoarding come to an end (the point of Maos invasion) take the power underlying, Gold intrinsic to all that know its true properties of transmutation. As Hitler attempted to dispose of the Hibiru and reclaimed the gems and gold it felt stolen. Funny, stolen from itself; someone betrayed someone else here just as it did Origin. Circular Always, Osiris reference. I suppose you could say Jesus was God but in disquise as the Son of. This is where I become angry; the entire arguement was false and misleading to begin with. The nose ring in the human. Source Entity was your slave master. It sickens me that you do not know this and orchestated all civil malcontent. It was a game. It still is.
As for the Islamic point of view, you only have two true options. Either Jesus was a liar or he was the Son of God.
To
say he is only a prophet is to also call
Jesus a liar because that would mean
he made false proclamations about his identity. There is no middle ground
and how can you call him a prophet if
he was also a liar in your opinion?
Originally posted by Joecroft
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
No. The manager of this universe has a name Source Entity. It has been human many times; playing both sides of the the fence, as Jesus IT sacraficed Itself to itself. . As the Dali Llama he fled his own people to hide in India watching his gold hoarding come to an end (the point of Maos invasion) take the power underlying, Gold intrinsic to all that know its true properties of transmutation. As Hitler attempted to dispose of the Hibiru and reclaimed the gems and gold it felt stolen. Funny, stolen from itself; someone betrayed someone else here just as it did Origin. Circular Always, Osiris reference. I suppose you could say Jesus was God but in disquise as the Son of. This is where I become angry; the entire arguement was false and misleading to begin with. The nose ring in the human. Source Entity was your slave master. It sickens me that you do not know this and orchestated all civil malcontent. It was a game. It still is.
No. Jesus was with the real Eternal Father God, and spoke on his behalf.
The manager, Source Entity, is not the creator…
- JC
God had no
beginning, because He is eternal.
When
Jesus was created, He was the
beginning!
He is not a Man; He is not a Prophet, in
the manly sense of the word, and
neither is He the Eternal Father God. He is The Son of God, set apart by the
Father, from the very beginning of
Time, and He is our Co-creator with the
Father, which makes Him Divine as
well.
Originally posted by logical7
It is like you saying me to flip a coin and wanting that 'heads you win' & 'tails you win' and then complaining when i refuse to toss it.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by logical7
It is like you saying me to flip a coin and wanting that 'heads you win' & 'tails you win' and then complaining when i refuse to toss it.
No, it's like you offering to toss a coin, best out of three, and adding that times when the coin lands with heads upward don't count.
It's like me trying to "prove" from the Koran that Muhammed was an emissary of Satan, and then adding that people who want to argue that Muhammed was a Prophet should refrain from entering the debate.
It's called "wanting to play with loaded dice".
I promise you, every time you, as a Muslim, try to prove from the Christian New Testament, which you don't understand, that Christ could not be God, you will get a Christian response explaining how he can be God. That is legitimate.
Genesis 1:3 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
John 8:12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."
Colossians 1:15-20
15 The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.
Originally posted by logical7
NT is supposed to be a biography of him by unknown authors and contain things more than the gospel he preached.
Qur'an gives me a very good idea of who he was
even many priests and bible scholars agree to the Qur'anic perspective rather than the christian interpretation of Bible.
Originally posted by logical7
so God made a Son first.
so will Jesus pbuh desire a son?
Whats the future of Jesus?
God The Father is Eternal, so Jesus pbuh will never inherit the 'Throne' or is God planning to retire!!
A family or just watch the company of christians be happy with their families, while he is without and lonely?
Will he keep suffering for the sake of christians?!
The answer is found in the bible. And it is surprising easy to understand. Genesis 1:3 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. John 8:12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."
The other text is Mark, xiii, 32: "Of that day or hour no man knoweth, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father." After all that has been written on this question in recent years, we see no need to add anything to the traditional explanations: the Son has no knowledge of the judgment day which He may communicate; or, the Son has no knowledge of this event, which springs from His human nature as such; or again, the Son has no knowledge of the day and the hour, that has not been communicated to Him by the Father.
No. The New Testament authors are known. And no, the gospel doesn't contain more than he preached. Unlike the Qu'ran, nothing is added to Jesus words in the New Testament. It comes from first hand sources who lived with Jesus and who learned from His apostles.
That's HIGHLY doubtful. You might find
one or two ministers who are mixed
up and buy into the Qu'ran .. but
'scholars' know that the Qu'ran is
fictional material invented 600+ years
after Jesus walked the Earth and that it isn't accurate at all.
Eternally begotten of the Father ... not made.
Originally posted by logical7
bible scholars say different.
would you care to read the Qur'an?
Give a fair chance to Qur'an. What do you say?
Originally posted by logical7
How he got 'begotten' as 1st creation before anything else existed?
God just divided Himself in 3?
We believe (I believe) in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, and born of the Father before all ages. (God of God) light of light, true God of true God. Begotten not made, consubstantial to the Father, by whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven. And was incarnate of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary and was made man; was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate, suffered and was buried; and the third day rose again according to the Scriptures. And ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, and shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead, of whose Kingdom there shall be no end. And (I believe) in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father (and the Son), who together with the Father and the Son is to be adored and glorified, who spoke by the Prophets. ...
Originally posted by logical7
He dint knew the hour because he has been taught all about it!!
What is 'Word' exactly?
How can you assume that an outsider would agree with your explanations by taking your word of priests/fathers word for it.
what if its just creative imagination?