It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by smithjustinb
But when you seek contentment in things outside of yourself, outside of what is here now, then your contentment will be delayed and you will suffer. So if you are content with lack, and content with not having your desires fulfilled, then you will never be without.
In Africa , people still think that there are witches, last week, a woman was tortured and burned to death because they thought she was a witch
I think I am approaching life at this point through this perspective. I have known humilty I have known wealth I have known poverty. The more I strive from an ego centric perspective the more I am setting myself up for disappointment.
1) by detachment, is this the ultimate survival and pain reliever ever invented for a practical reason...ie during times of extreme persecution was this form of escape into the mind/ negation of the outside stimulii a coping mechanism?
2) having read various threads like " John Lears theory regarding the Soul Collector
3) does the idea of doing away with the soul make the pain more bearable? Am I still scared of heaven or hell even though I understand they are inventions of abrahaimic theology and that we create our own heaven or hell?
What if there is a soul catcher out there? What if the TPTB or aliens are harvesting souls.
If the above assumptions prove to have some basis in reality can I afford to sit back and not worry about the soul attached to this container? Why should my soul not reach nirvana or progress to the next reincarnation? Sure live in the moment, live the moment as its your last day on earth. And yet there is a part of me (yeah I know, not the real me/ego) that wants to think, to know that it all hasnt been in vain. Insights? thanks kindly
"And it is obvious to me that the truth is difficult to perform before men." The savior answered, saying, "If the things that are visible to you are obscure to you, how can you hear about the things that are not visible? If the deeds of the truth that are visible in the world are difficult for you to perform, how indeed, then, shall you perform those that pertain to the exalted height and to the pleroma which are not visible? And how shall you be called 'laborers'? In this respect you are apprentices, and have not yet received the height of perfection." Now Thomas answered and said to the savior, "Tell us about these things that you say are not visible, but are hidden from us."
God indeed is the ultimate enlightenment. The Book of Thomas is something beautifully telling and revealing to read. It is the journey of a seeker 'mankind' inside the world he can and cannot see.
You do realize that claiming to be enlightened is the ultimate EGO self aggrandizement you can possibly make?
I run into "hipsters" daily talking about how enlightened they are. If that's enlightenment; I don't want it.
The truly enlightened, never talk about it; they just are.
I'm calling cheese...
Originally posted by Eternium
There is nothing you can do to be enlightened, all our efforts towards enlightenment are phony ~ Krishnamurti
Because there's no one at home to do anything about anything.
Originally posted by dominicus
Originally posted by Eternium
There is nothing you can do to be enlightened, all our efforts towards enlightenment are phony ~ Krishnamurti
Because there's no one at home to do anything about anything.
I call bullsh**. Krishnamurti was one of the leaders and creators of the whole super negation movement, which says there is no one home, nothing you can do, and leaves it at that. Sailor Bob does it too. Its Neo-Advaita and its a crock.
Did you seek enlightenment Dominicus?
Had you an idea of what it was prior to the happening?
What is so different about life when enlightenment has been realized?
What Krishnamurti means is that all 'effort' is 'seeking'. 'Seeking' is what causes the individual - it is what divides the whole.
The whole is always whole but it seeks (puts effort in) to find itself. The effort is what is the suffering - the effort is contraction. The contraction of energy seems to separate itself from itself (the one energy) and this is what hurts. The pain of life causes one to seek the end of this pain - so some 'seek' enlightenment because they have heard that it cures the pain of life. So some 'seek' enlightenment and they suffer in their seeking. Enlightenment just happens and when it does it can be described but it cannot be prescribed in my opinion.
Originally posted by dominicus
If Krishnamurti is right, and there is nothing to do, then he should have stayed quiet and never said a word, and people should immediately stop listening to what he has to say ...cause then there is no point. Just Nothing and that's it.edit on 7-4-2013 by dominicus because: (no reason given)
Not doing anything is the same as doing.
People talk for the same reason birds sing, regardless what you can or can't do.
The reality is, there is no one observing or anything observed. It happens of itself.
The trouble comes from thinking there is any trouble.
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
Epic thread and some great reading, thanks.
OP I have experienced some of what you have posted so understand and appreciate your ability to map it and try to assist others with alternative pathways which ultimately lead to the same place.
Great job.