It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Crakeur
yes, that one as well. any time someone imposes a creator on a group, it is, in my eyes, cultish and, yes, that goes for the fine folks who sit around me when I attend services.
To the illumined man or woman, a clod of dirt, a stone, and gold are the same.
Bhagavad Gita
Originally posted by Konoyaro
People need to get over the gold bullion thing it's not what this is about. It's just a legal reminder of your freedom, and that the all people together decide what this reality looks like, do we need money? No. Do we need leaders? Perhaps but only in the way of teachers, the current "leaders" do not set an example for any sane person to follow.
I imagine a world built on this would result in something like the fictitious land of Pala in Aldous Huxley's Island, seems to be worthy path to follow.
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
Originally posted by Konoyaro
People need to get over the gold bullion thing it's not what this is about. It's just a legal reminder of your freedom, and that the all people together decide what this reality looks like, do we need money? No. Do we need leaders? Perhaps but only in the way of teachers, the current "leaders" do not set an example for any sane person to follow.
I imagine a world built on this would result in something like the fictitious land of Pala in Aldous Huxley's Island, seems to be worthy path to follow.
Therein lies the rub!
There are a whole plethora of things I would love to do, and journeys I would love to undertake.
The only thing currently stopping me, is some form of bartering required, to facilitate these things.
How will OPPT help me to achieve these life goals? How will "sticking it to the man" afford me the means to complete my plans?
Originally posted by fourthmeal
How, how in the world is this still a discussion about a "court of public opinion"? The UCC is not opinion. It is the universal law of commerce.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
Also, some of you are in denial of a few things that are holding you back. For instance, the very mention of aliens / ET, and you throw this in the garbage. Why? Maybe deal with that first and then come back to this. I know for absolute fact that there are other entities here present, some benevolent and some not. Its a game being played but also a war. It is a frequency war, really. You must shift your frequency in order to see it at some point.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
You have much to learn.
the UCC is universal, uniform, and very much international
And then I saw the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (in caps) corporation registered in London.
And every single interaction is commerce. All is UCC-governed.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
Maybe refer to this which was just posted by RTS, may help a bit in setting some stuff straight. removingtheshackles.blogspot.com...
.
On March of 1933 the constitution of the United States of America was suspended and each citizen was determined to be an Enemy of the State by FDR
.
According to Schroder, the foundation for the current crisis was laid on October 6, 1917 with the passage of the Trading With the Enemy Act. This act gave the President the power to regulate, during time of war, all financial transactions involving any "individual, partnership, or body of individuals residing within any nation with which the U.S. is at war." On March 9, 1933, five days after Roosevelt's inauguration and four days after he had declared a national emergency, Congress passed the Emergency Banking Act, which amended the Trading With the Enemy Act to include regulation of transactions not only with the enemy but also between Americans during time of war or national emergency.
Since FDR had already declared a national emergency to deal with the bank "crisis," this unconstitutional legislation immediately gave the President much of the confidence he needed to launch the economic segment of his "New Deal" agenda. The result, of course, was an assault on the traditional form of American government and the free enterprise system under which America had flourished. FDR's declaration of a national emergency has never been terminated and has been joined by numerous other declarations of national emergency by subsequent presidents. Dr. Schroder cites this, as well as various government reports and laws, as "proof" that our nation has slipped into an "unconstitutional dictatorship." But as we shall see, he overlooks the fact that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and cannot be suspended or superseded via a law or presidential decree. In effect, he confuses violations of the Constitution with a suspension of the Constitution.
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by fourthmeal
no, they aren't. the UCC filings are for the United States. They are claiming a global (and interplanetary if you read carefully) action but people and corporations that are not US citizens or US corporations, are not bound by US law and all the UCC filings in the world won't help perfect a claim against a foreign person or entity.
No matter what the truckstop attorney might be saying.