It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Brighter
Originally posted by flexy123
There is ANY and PLENTY of reasons to be skeptical, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this.
If we just take this site as one, simple example - almost EVERY day someone is posting a UFO video/story/report.
And almost each and ANY of those "UFO sightings" can normally easily be explained.
It's a an undeniable fact that "people" see UFOs and report what they THINK they see and there is overwhelming chance that those people (regardless of what they claim) are wrong, misinterpreted things, hoaxed or zillions of other reasons. The remaining percentage of "genuine" sightings is incredible, incredible small.
Since the majority of UFO sightings (and even media reports about them) are BELONGING TO THE 99,99% of sightings which are explainable, hoaxes, PR stunts, fakes and what not..it can not be surprising in the slightest that people who are interested in the topic are (or grow to be) EXTREMELY skeptic.
So..when someone like "a friend" (or another ATS user) or my parents or neighbors or whoever claims they saw an UFO (in the classic sense of it being something really extraordinary without an explanation) I have all reason to "doubt" them..respective their interpretation since in 99,99% of all cases it will not be "an UFO" but just something they saw and could not explain, often even something as trivial as a planet, a bright star or plane landing lights. FACT.
Not a fact.
Care to explain the statistical methods you employed to arrive at the figures that you quoted above?
You weren't just making those up, were you? Nah, of course you weren't.
You might want to take a gander at karl12's thread here:
Official UFO Unexplained Report Percentages
And if you're going to focus solely on the daily deluge of YouTube videos that people post on here, on what basis do you believe that that is a representative sample of UFO cases in general?edit on 1-2-2013 by Brighter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Druscilla
Show us your hypothetical signal from outer space.
Do you have one of these signals you describe?
No?
Originally posted by ImpactoR
The current evidence of this is enough to not be excluded because there are still many things secret and unknown so claiming it doesn't exist because I don't see an alien knocking on my door is bull# way of thinking when a lot of things are in secret.
I have a secret base underground, I keep a top secret weapon, some guy learns about it but gets shot. Some vague stories around him. The stories go to the internet, no evidence is ever found other than some vague picture. 'SKEPTICS" : it doesn't exist, it's all a lie, I do not see the base, I do not have pictures, I am never invited to that base damn it! It doesn't exist.
That's the logic of Pseudoskeptics and scoffers
Originally posted by ImpactoR
Originally posted by Druscilla
Show us your hypothetical signal from outer space.
Do you have one of these signals you describe?
No?
I've told you many times but maybe I will repeat myself again. Even if one should seek sufficient evidence to says something with certainty, the lack of evidence in you straight site, hands is not a reason to dismiss something, when there is enough evidence to not be excluded
The current evidence of this is enough to not be excluded because there are still many things secret and unknown so claiming it doesn't exist because I don't see an alien knocking on my door is bull# way of thinking when a lot of things are in secret.
I have a secret base underground, I keep a top secret weapon, some guy learns about it but gets shot. Some vague stories around him. The stories go to the internet, no evidence is ever found other than some vague picture. 'SKEPTICS" : it doesn't exist, it's all a lie, I do not see the base, I do not have pictures, I am never invited to that base damn it! It doesn't exist.
That's the logic of Pseudoskeptics and scoffers
Specifically for SETI signal, I never bought that this is an intelligence sent signal, I am just talking of the Logical Fallacy, like one guy said the true skeptic doubts but does not dismiss and claim non-existence with certainty when there's lot's of secrecy and undebunked cases - or else the rest is PSEUDOskepticism
That is funny. What exactly is "logical trickery" anyway?
Originally posted by draknoir2
reply to post by xszawe
Ahh yes... another "Evil Skeptics Spoiling Things for us True Believers" thread.
What with their unreasonable demands for evidence to support extraordinary claims - it's logical trickery!!!
"Fallacious arguments usually have the deceptive appearance of being good arguments."[1] Recognizing fallacies in everyday arguments may be difficult since arguments are often embedded in rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical connections between statements. Informal fallacies may also exploit the emotional, intellectual, or psychological weaknesses of the audience. Having the capability to recognize fallacies in arguments is one way to reduce the likelihood of such occurrences.
I have looked at a lot of those things that you described....and well, I was pretty much "taken in" by those stories and documentaries that talked about such things as fact. As I looked at each thing, from the sceptical side the stories began to crumble one by one. There a couple of "stories" that I hold onto but the way I procede now-a-days is to ask questions. I'm not sure about which items exactly that you refer to in your list but the things I looked at seemed ligit at first,but turned out not to be. Lots of stories circulate the inner webs that are based on half truths or are just plain fabrications. They are circulated and repeated so much that they become a factual reality to some. Its like a whole reality based on stories retold over and over. Myths on steroids.
Originally posted by ImpactoR
reply to post by Druscilla
And that answers yor question, ZetaReticluan, how do I know there is something hidden. Well duh, documents classified declassified about UFOs, people being told to shut up, these are not made up things. And of course, the accounts of people, weird historical things having striking similarities with what would be today's objects etc etc
And another fallacy of your logic is to think that just because someone says - I do not know, there may be even alien visitation hidden - does not mean 'I am a believer, i believe every bogus story
The difference between what exactly? I believe what I said was that you implied there are secrets being kept about space aliens and asked if that is what you meant.
Im really sorry for you if you cant make the difference, thats ignorance, close mindness and scoffing, P.S I am not sure aliens is the hidden thing, i think it's possible'
I'm not following the logic behind your argument of "there are secrets" so it can't exist is false. How do you know there are secrets? It would seem that you are implying that these "secrets" are of alien visitation because why else would there be secrets?
So you are saying the evidence we have now is not enough so don't dismiss this because there are secrets that will be revealed that prove it?
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
I NEVER speak in absolutes...at least I try not to.
Originally posted by draknoir2
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
I NEVER speak in absolutes...at least I try not to.
Didn't try hard enough that time.
:-)
yeah, I absolutely screwed that one up...OK enough of that. back on topic now. "logical trickery" is now a term I will be embracing from here on. As in "What kind of logical trickery is this?" and could be the name of my new band The Logical Tricksters. My fans will either be called "trick heads" or "Log heads" its just in the planning stages now. Anyway, what his thread lacks is actual logic from pseudo believers.
Originally posted by draknoir2
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
I NEVER speak in absolutes...at least I try not to.
Didn't try hard enough that time.
:-)
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
. I just don't know of any solid argument for space people flying space ships around the earth. Anyone? .
Originally posted by draknoir2
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
. I just don't know of any solid argument for space people flying space ships around the earth. Anyone? .
It would be too conspicuous for them to use commercial airlines?
Originally posted by ImpactoR
reply to post by Druscilla
What is this post star begging? I don't care about stars, where did you even see me mentioning Greer as credible or anyone of his kind.
I have a secret base underground, I keep a top secret weapon, some guy learns about it but gets shot. Some vague stories around him. The stories go to the internet, no evidence is ever found other than some vague picture. 'SKEPTICS" : it doesn't exist, it's all a lie, I do not see the base, I do not have pictures, I am never invited to that base damn it! It doesn't exist.
That's the logic of Pseudoskeptics and scoffers
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
It seems a little fogging of the difference between a "skeptic"...and a "cynic" or "debunker".
*snip*
Most skeptics I know would really like to believe there is something "else" out there (be it aliens, ghosts, magic, alternate dimensions, etc), they just have not came across anything that convinced them yet.
Originally posted by ImpactoR
I have a secret base underground, I keep a top secret weapon, some guy learns about it but gets shot. Some vague stories around him. The stories go to the internet, no evidence is ever found other than some vague picture. 'SKEPTICS" : it doesn't exist, it's all a lie, I do not see the base, I do not have pictures, I am never invited to that base damn it! It doesn't exist.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Don't call them skeptics. They aren't really skeptics, they are believers who can't fit data into their narrow world-view. True skeptics have symmetrical doubt, they don't deny. Call them pseudo-skeptics.
en.wikipedia.org...
Oooo, I like it I like it.
But admit it, some are just plain skeptical on just about anything they can't touch or see.
Meanwhile space is made up supposedly of mostly invisible stuff so..... extra DIV