Planned Parenthood Touts over 333,000 Babies Aborted in 2011

reply to post by boymonkey74

Around 100,000 kids with no parents in the US a massive burden on resources, so all you anti abortion people please adopt a child.

They do adopt children. The problem is they get them from foreign countries. It's the in thing to do now.

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by FissionSurplus

 

God may also be pissed off at the GOP for not passing the Violence Against Women Act!

why violence against women act not act against all violence???
on topic...... i am not against abortion but women should pay for it themselves not taxpayers ....

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by Vidpci

 

God murdered and slaughtered all the time.

God doesn't murder anyone.....deny ignorance and stop posting nonsense...

Im sure this wont be taken well by many, but YES, I am in favor of *keeping abortions legal*. I will gladly pay taxes for them. Thats 333000 babies that don't have to suffer now from either parents who can't or won't take care of them, from being born addicted to the same drugs their parents couldn't or wouldn't help but abuse, from being the baby of a baby or who may not get adopted and add to the starving and homeless children we already have in our country. I am confident when I say that every single one of those babies is better off in heaven. If the mother is smart enough to know that baby won't have a good life, then who are we to argue it. I always say this, and I will always feel this way, it is the mothers decision. Its her body, its her baby. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't do it myself, i couldn't live with it, but I have a caring family, that I could count on to help me raise my angels and give them the beautiful life they deserve, emotionally and financially but who the F*** am I to make that decision for another human being.

God Bless Planned Parenthood.



*I saw what therationalist said, and I agree, it would be a lot better if they paid for it themselves, but personally I don't mind paying the taxes because I know I'm helping save these babies from a miserable and painful life.


If you agree or disagree with me, I may not agree your opinion but I will ALWAYS respect your right to have your own opinion.

reply to post by Vidpci


How long do you lock them in the cage (considering it's murder)?

Here is the report -- PPP does many things for women. Abortion is a necessary service.

The report

issuu.com...

I don't get it. What's the point of having unprotected sex if you're just going to abort the kid? Isn't it just so much cheaper to buy a pack of condoms or get some contraceptive?

reply to post by Philodemus

How long do you lock them in the cage (considering it's murder)?

When your spouse makes eggs in the morning, does s/he ask you "How do you want your chicken"?

I don't care for both the Anti abortionist or the Abortionist....


I draw the line at about 4-5 months(brain activity)... i mean if you decide to abort now(unless health issue), that's just disgusting. I'm not saying what people should do, i just look at those with disgust and that is my opinion.


I only knew few people who did that, one was a druggy, one had miscarriage, other didn't know for 4 months(is this possible?).

Originally posted by Vidpci

People that stop another human heart from beating should be thrown in a cage like an animal. Don't want a kid? Learn to be responsible. Now I have no issues here with very early abortion (before a heart beat) and if it's used to save the mother's life. But you do not walk into a clinic and abort a 7 month old child because it's your "womanly right". Calling that anything else but murder is insane.

This is an argument from an obvious lack of knowledge of both law and science.

As another member has already pointed out the "7 month old child" argument is pedantic rhetoric and is not based in any form of reality.

Now, more to the important issue; you don't seem to really know what you're arguing when it comes to the actual way that conception and pregnancy work.

After insemination, conception can take (and often does) up to 14 days to actually occur. conceptionSo, for the first 14 days the women wouldn't be pregnant. Therefore would have negative test results, as far as I can tell. Now there is the matter of the heart beginning to beat. Do you even know when that happens? It begins to beat very soon after the cells begin to divide and beats its own blood at day 22. My wife was completely unaware of all three pregnancies until her third month. What then? There is a very small window between conception and heartbeat. So small in fact, that your chosen point of abortion is for all practical reasons...asinine.
So then, what's your take on “the morning after pill”?
By the way the only way to prevent unwanted pregnancy is to abstain. That's the ONLY 100%.

With the stats you posted how many were;
Less than 3 months?
More than 3 months?
More than 6 months?

'nuff said.

reply to post by ManFromEurope


The issue you've raised is really the point of why I posted the video above. What about the mothers and families? What about society?

I don't care what opinions someone may have on any given subject. But if your opinions is not complete carried through with prudence and humanity to its very end, then it is not a valid opinion and is instead one that should be approached with prejudice. I have been (and most likely still am) guilty of this kind of opinion. Which is why I value the colleges I have, for they do not hesitate to make me take my thinking to the end and show me the fallacy lurking.

The stranger thing is that most if not all people complaining about the deaths of children at New Town, could care less about the murdering of babies on a daily basis. As someone else has put it, in their mind, shooting a child is "extreme", but sucking their brains out with a vacum is just "a tough choice". Have fun reconciling the hypocrisy

Originally posted by ManFromEurope

'nuff said.

Not that you care, but an embryo isn't a potential human, it is a human.

Your skin cells, your blood, your hair, your semen etc, are just that "yours". They all are your DNA exclusively so you can do with it whatever you want.

An embryo has its own unique, seperate DNA. As for the death penalty, if you want to place the "fetus" on trial, and they are found guilty of capital murder, than by all means they should get the death penalty. You must first put them on trial.

I feel silly having to explain this, maybe if I post in in a cool blog, or whatever that lame article was sourced from, it will get read and appreciated.

reply to post by kingofmd


Human tissue does not equal a human. Cultured cells in a lab have a DNA sequence yet they have no potential to be anything more. An embryo does. Therefore, we have to find a different point to determine the "humanness" of a human beyond the fact that their DNA has the human sequence. As a result, you look to potentials and try to pin point when potential characteristics have switched to acquired ones.

If we cannot make this distinction then brain dead people get left on life support ad infinity. There is indeed a
difference between some of the parts of a human and an actually human.

“I feel silly having to explain that”

Oh, and it is distrubing that in your world, (even if hypothetical) that you would put a child on trial for murder and then assign the death penalty. Would you really do that if a four year old killed someone?

Originally posted by badgerprints

Originally posted by FissionSurplus

Leave the judging to God.

I believe god will judge us all pretty harshly for standing by as millions of women murder their children.

Are you talking about the same God as in the Old Testament of the Bible? If you are, why would he be upset about women doing something that he NEVER prohibited, but, in fact, ordered the abortion of 1000's of women, and murder of even more infants?

The God of the Bible had no respect for human life, and if it wasn't for fear of his enemies taking credit for his inability to handle humanity, he would've killed all if his people, and wiped their memory from history!

Deut 32
23 I will heap mischiefs upon them; I will spend mine arrows upon them.
24 They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust.
25 The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs.
26 I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men: 27 Were it not that I feared the wrath of the enemy, lest their adversaries should behave themselves strangely, and lest they should say, Our hand is high, and the Lord hath not done all this.

Best keep God out of this debate, he's irrelevant!

well, there`s one easy way to stop all abortions, all the anti abortion folks could make a legally binding agreement to adopt all the unwanted babies,raise them and financially support them until they turn 18 years old.
or
all the anti abortion people could make a legally binding agreement to pay more taxes for welfare,foodstamps and other government handouts that will be needed to support all those unwanted fetuses if they are forced to be brought to term.

if abortion is such an important issue to people then let them put their money where their mouth is but it`s immoral and wrong to tell all tax payers that we have to pay more taxes to finance a religious issue.
abortion is legal so it`s not a legal issue, if people have objections to abortion based on their religious beliefs,that`s a personal problem and trying to force all tax payers to finance a religious belief is just WRONG and unamerican.

reply to post by Tardacus


I agree. You are on topic and you get a star.

reply to post by Philodemus


That's right, I'm the bad guy here. That's all this thread is about. Not the 330,000 that never got a chance to live. No, this thread is about I'm the bad guy because I point the finger. This isn't about western birthrates decreasing to the point that we are literally becoming a dying people. This isn't about obvious racist propaganda that initiated planned parenthood. This isn't even about the feminist movement and how it's purpose from the start was to brainwash women and destroy the family. No, I'm ignorant, uneducated and I'm the bad guy because I don't agree with it.

It's not my job to judge you.

Originally posted by Vidpci
reply to post by Philodemus

 

That's right, I'm the bad guy here. That's all this thread is about. Not the 330,000 that never got a chance to live. No, this thread is about I'm the bad guy because I point the finger. This isn't about western birthrates decreasing to the point that we are literally becoming a dying people. This isn't about obvious racist propaganda that initiated planned parenthood. This isn't even about the feminist movement and how it's purpose from the start was to brainwash women and destroy the family. No, I'm ignorant, uneducated and I'm the bad guy because I don't agree with it.

It's not my job to judge you.

I think that the correct way to lower the abortion numbers is easy access to affordable birth control. Just imagine if all those 330,000 women had been on the pill, or some other effective contraception. Those potential children would never have a chance to live!

Would those women, having access to affordable birth control, still be victims of an obvious racist and still be brainwashed to destroy the family?