It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HellstormRising
Not sure if you're trolling or not but by the logic above, you can ban the following items as well.
Bow & Arrows
Cars,
Butter Knives,
Fixed blade boot knives,
hatchets,
axes,
power drills,
saws - power and hand held,
flat head and philips head screw drivers,
awls,
rope,
cement,
socks and doorknobs,
I hope you get my point.
Originally posted by mazzroth
Listen here. I own plenty of firearms and this has to be said: Not everyone is entitled to own a gun, people with a propensity to break the law and violent people should never be allowed to own guns period. I don't care about your right to bare arms as part of your Constitution because that was written in an age when people had generally a higher moral standing and doing the proper thing was taught.
These days you have all kinds of idiots doing stupid and dangerous things under the influence of modern cocktails of drugs that alter an individuals thought process, that coupled with the lack of common decency.
I don't want any idiot to have a gun, there has to be some kind of vetting to see if you are a fit and proper person who could be trusted and not just rock up to the store and buy what ever you want.
That is a seriously flawed argument, one is unintentional, one is not. That is a seriously flawed argument, one is unintentional, one is not.
The gunman intends to kill right from the start.
guns don't kill... people do.
Look, I have no dog in this fight but this 'Guns don't kill people' argument is moronic.
You're doing yourselves no favors here. For 's sake stop being so stupid and move the argument forward, anyone would think you are trying to make gun owners look foolish.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by whatsecret
The difference is the nurse INTENDED to kill, and yes, I mean gunman, not criminal, yes the gunman maybe a criminal (or soon will be after killing someone), but he is still using a gun, therefore a gunman.
.
For the record, I was referring to people using guns to commit a crime, not every single person who owns a gun.
Texting while driving kills 6,000 annually in the U.S. alone
Hippos kill 2,900 people annually in Africa
Autoerotic Asphyxiation Kills 600 people annually
Falling out of bed kills 450 people annually in the U.S
Icicles kill 100 people per year in Russia
Jellyfish kill 20-40 people per year in the Philippines alone
Dogs kill 34 people per year in the U.S.
Ants kill 30 people per year
Vending machines kill 13 people per year
Roller Coasters kill 4 people per year
In the United States, 31,224 people die from gun violence each year and 66,768 other people are injured by guns yet survive
But the syringe, nor the bleach were designed specifically with ending life.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by whatsecret
My point is though, the other stuff wasn't originally designed to kill.
The gun WAS originally designed to kill (by the Chinese btw).
Lots of inventions are used other than their original purpose, can't take away the original purpose though, can you.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by CaptChaos
That is a seriously flawed argument, one is unintentional, one is not.
The surgeon/doctor sets out with the intention of saving a life, and things go wrong. The gunman intends to kill right from the start.
EDIT: That plus there is a lot more surgeries performed per year by people who want to save lives than people who go out and kill.edit on 13/12/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)
A lib at work said that they needed to ban guns for the month of December because that is when suicides are the highest in any given month
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by whatsecret
But the syringe, nor the bleach were designed specifically with ending life.
And yes, all those things make a criminal, but we aren't discussing that now, are we.