It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FoosM
choos
FoosM
Soylent Green Is People
choos
reply to post by FoosM
your video is of the assumption that schmitt jumped into the seat only once..
I think he jumped "into" the seat once, but going by what they said to each other, it could be that Jack Schmitt "bounced" up and down a few times to ham it up for the camera. Schmitt laughed after Gene Cernan said "I got three of them" (three pictures while Schmitt jumped/bounced in his seat).
It could even be that several seconds had passed while Cernan was taking the three pictures.
edit on 3/24/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Watch the following videos in the series.
We will see how many of your "could be's" hold up.
did.. and its still of the assumption that it was only one jump into the LRV..
who is to say that Schmitt did not have a practice jump and realised the scoop/sampler was in the way (without realising cernan had already taken a photo)
thus he removed it holding it in his right hand and while jumping into the seat for the photo, not realising that he had dropped the scoop/sampler onto the ground..
being of the assumption that it all happened in one jump is also a "could be"edit on 24-3-2014 by choos because: (no reason given)
Who is to say?
Well NASA's own transcripts do.
They limit the time any of what you are imagining could happen.
onebigmonkey
webstra
So after you are thinking what the USA has told you...that they landed man on the moon you now fill in what you think that i think ? Please stop those silly thoughts.edit on 24-3-2014 by webstra because: (no reason given)
Like Rob48 I'm not American either, and I have no loyalty towards or general admiration of that country's government or politics - quite the opposite in fact. My pro-Apollo stance is because the evidence supporting the historical record is overwhelming and has never been disproven, no matter how many grandiose claims are made by anti-science web crusaders.
I am also old enough to have been around during the missions and don't have to rely on youtube for my understanding of the missions or their place in history.
What's interesting in your post here is that you ignore a point that criticises your maths and focus instead on attacking the poster by saying they are just repeating a government message. Says a lot.
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
FoosM
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
LRO was owned by who? The Russians?
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
DJW001
FoosM
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
LRO was owned by who? The Russians?
Have the Russians proven the images to be fake?
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
FoosM
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
LRO was owned by who? The Russians?
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
The apology is for accusing me of lying. That makes you the liar, not me. I finally managed to see the video. Remember when we discussed it three years ago? The ladder doesn't move, the camera moves. It is mounted on a hinged platform that can shake when the astronauts bounce down the ladder. Remember?
wmd_2008
FoosM
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
LRO was owned by who? The Russians?
Hey SHADOW man it doesn't matter who owns it there are HUNDREDS of small objects/craters that can be seen on LRO images that match with Hasselblad images.
onebigmonkey
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
This is what your videos look like when you post them as youtube links and not urls
That simple enough for you?
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
The apology is for accusing me of lying. That makes you the liar, not me. I finally managed to see the video. Remember when we discussed it three years ago? The ladder doesn't move, the camera moves. It is mounted on a hinged platform that can shake when the astronauts bounce down the ladder. Remember?
The ladder moves. And it moves while the astronauts are on the ground, not bouncing down the ladder.
Sorry, you fail again.
Watch this folks:
But if you insist its the camera moving, why doesn't the entire image tilt?
FoosM
wmd_2008
FoosM
wmd_2008
demus
so guys, can anyone tell me for sure did "we" landed on the Moon or not?
I mean 100% sure?
Well all the landing sites were pictured by the LRO in orbit around the Moon and very small craters and rocks that are in the Hasselblad images taken by the Astronauts can be seen in the LRO images there are hundreds of these small objects so that alone is enough proof well for anyone with a reasonable level of common sense.
LRO was owned by who? The Russians?
Hey SHADOW man it doesn't matter who owns it there are HUNDREDS of small objects/craters that can be seen on LRO images that match with Hasselblad images.
So NASA's Hasselblad images match their own LRO images...
Wow. Amazing. Bravo. Who would have thunk?
FoosM
Take it up with ATS, YOUTUBE, or your internet provider, why are you bothering me with it when
I provide directs links as well.
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
FoosM
DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Once again, you have posted a dead link. Are you doing that deliberately?
No, but I think Dave and Jim deliberately lifted the leg of the LM to show it was fake.
www.youtube.com...
Where do they do that? Your video doesn't work. And you owe me an apology.
Im not going to apologize if you cant watch videos on ATS.
Maybe your job is blocking content.
Would that be NASA perhaps?
video
The apology is for accusing me of lying. That makes you the liar, not me. I finally managed to see the video. Remember when we discussed it three years ago? The ladder doesn't move, the camera moves. It is mounted on a hinged platform that can shake when the astronauts bounce down the ladder. Remember?
The ladder moves. And it moves while the astronauts are on the ground, not bouncing down the ladder.
Sorry, you fail again.
Watch this folks:
But if you insist its the camera moving, why doesn't the entire image tilt?
It's called parallax. The ladder is much, much closer to the camera than the horizon, which is the only other thing in shot.