It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stanislav
The word 'Skeptic' and 'Disbeliever' are synonymous. Please check your online dictionary.
Originally posted by stanislav
Notice OP disappeared, never to return here again.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
You can be skeptical about a subject without being a skeptic.
Originally posted by gguyx
reply to post by stanislav
Two examples are the theory that an asteroid caused the extinction of the dinosaurs and the theory of plate tectonics. Both sets of proponents were roundly criticized and ridiculed for many years. A generation passed before overwhelming evidence surfaced to vindicate both theories. In the case of Luis Alvarez and his son Walter, a layer of iridium was discovered at the K-T (Cretaceous Tertiary) boundary worldwide indicating an asteroid strike. Iridium is an element rarely found on earth but is found in asteroids. In Wegener's case, paleomagnetic studies, along with voluminous geological and biological evidence, largely but not completely, vindicated his theory.
Controversy raged for decades doing harm to reputations and standing among their respective colleagues.
Originally posted by synchronomy
I am a firm believer in the ETH based on my own experiences, however I am often labelled as a skeptic simply because I question and dig deeper into every piece of evidence I see, whether it be witness testimony, video, or documents.
People will often say, "I thought you were a believer?"...well yes, I am, however I don't (or attempt not to) allow my drive to find "Exhibit A" to bias my discernment of evidence.
There is an extravagant abundance of well-produced CGI videos available and I try not to jump headlong down every rabbit hole like the famous bunny in Alice in Wonderland.