It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That appears to be the MPs contention.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Hello Oll, I think the dispute is in the *extent* to which Muslim men are responsible for child abuse in the UK and specifically England.
Group and gang associated child sexual exploitation (GGACSE)
Data currently suggests that a disproportionate number of offenders are British Asian, particularly British Pakistani, males. However, more work needs to be done with a broader set of data to better understand whether any correlation exists.
Link
Originally posted by Kandinsky
I'm a little slow on the uptake sometimes so forgive me if I'm coming across as uninformed or plain stupid, your other comments seem to suggest that 'political correctness' is also responsible for covering up and allowing Muslims to engage in these activities.
Have I got that right?
Social workers and police in a town where nine men were found guilty of running a child sexual exploitation ring had been warned dozens of times that local girls were at risk of abuse in the years before charges were brought in that case, the Guardian can reveal.
Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that an NHS team providing sexual health services to vulnerable young people made 83 referrals to Rochdale borough council about girls they thought were either being sexually exploited, or were at risk of exploitation, between 2004 and the end of 2010.
Staff on the crisis intervention team (CIT) also made 44 referrals to Greater Manchester police in the same period.
Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk said: "The Guardian's investigation shows without any doubt that police and social services ignored an endemic problem of abuse.
"Time and again, the local authority were alerted to the fact these girls were being abused and they failed to do anything. We now need to know what action is being taken against these people that turned a blind eye to abuse and ignored numerous cries for help from young, vulnerable girls."
The Guardian
Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
Please clarify something for me.
Does it make any difference to the victim if the person who is abusing or raping them is black/white, muslim/christian, male/female?
If anything I would be far far more concerned about people in positions of authority and trust abusing and raping others, then I am about random strangers roaming the streets looking for victims.
Would it make you feel better if it was exclusively white males doing the raping?
tired of control freaks
This comment stood out to me.
"Women who do not wear the hijab are asking to be raped."
The leftists want to elevate the rights of muslems to NOT be offended by non head scarf wearing women, screw women's god-given right to be safe in their persons and NOT be raped for NOT wearing a head scarf.
The lunatics are in control of the asylum.
I'm heading further back in the woods.
Originally posted by Idahomie
The leftists want to elevate the rights of muslems to NOT be offended by non head scarf wearing women, screw women's god-given right to be safe in their persons and NOT be raped for NOT wearing a head scarf.
The lunatics are in control of the asylum. I'm heading further back in the woods.
...the gang's ringleader yesterday branded the judge a 'racist b******' after he and eight other men were jailed.
Judge Clifton... ...branded allegations that the prosecution was racially-motivated ‘nonsense’ and added: ‘This was triggered by your lust and greed. These sentences would apply to all defendants whether they be white or Asian.’
Daily Mail
Martin Narey, former chief executive of children’s charity Barnardo’s, told the programme there was a ‘real problem’ which had to be confronted.
‘There is very troubling evidence that Asians are overwhelmingly represented in prosecutions for such offences,’ he said. Mr Narey added that ‘vulnerable girls on the street at night are generally white rather than more strictly-parented Asian girls’.
He was backed by Ann Cryer, a former Labour MP in Keighley, West Yorkshire. She said: ‘This is an absolute scandal.
They (the police and CPS) were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness. They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.’
Daily Mail
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by ollncasino
Was it political correctness that dictated the same Rochdale police turn a blind eye to accusations and quite damning evidence of paedophilia against MP Cyril Smith?
Not everything is black and white my friend.
They (the police and CPS) were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness. They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.’
Daily Mail
In comparison to their earlier study in 2000, the findings suggest a decline in serious forms of contact sexual abuse. In addition, the level of coerced sexual acts against under 16 year olds declined from a 6.8% national prevalence rate in 1998 to 5% in 2009. These findings are consistent with other data.
Similarly, approximately 80% of sexual offences against children occur in the home of either the offender or the victim
The majority of victims originating from Africa and Eastern Europe were female, whilst from Asia, they were
mostly male. The explanation for these trends is likely to lie in the type of exploitation the children were trafficked into the UK to suffer. Many Eastern European girls, for example are trafficked to the UK for prostitution, whilst many Vietnamese boys are trafficked to work in the illegal drugs trade. However, intelligence suggests that a number of trafficked children are the victim of multiple forms of exploitation and abuse.
Data currently suggests that a disproportionate number of offenders are British Asian, particularly British Pakistani, males. However, more work needs to be done with a broader set of data to better understand whether any correlation exists.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Data currently suggests that a disproportionate number of offenders are British Asian, particularly British Pakistani, males. However, more work needs to be done with a broader set of data to better understand whether any correlation exists.
There's a suggestion of a 'disproportionate' number of Asian offenders.
Am I misinterpreting this? They aren't saying it's a wholesale Muslim issue.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
They aren't suggesting that all Muslims support child-abuse.
Originally posted by Anusuia
Obviously these creatures are hopefully the minority of the population , only because some of them fear to act immorally as is the norm for most people of the planet .