It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ssupp
Something is telling me that those accused of being a pedophile were about to become a wistle blower.
Originally posted by Britguy
I really don't have any high expectations that there will be any serious investigation done either. Especially when the police are the ones to investigate, and whose high ranking members are so politicized, with some having aspirations for political life, and some who are even members of Masonic lodges themselves.
They'll throw a couple of low level sex offenders behind bars and then it'll be business as ususal.
Originally posted by councilglasses
reply to post by lifttheveil
I'm begining to question what these abuse victims state as fact,after years of rumour about Mc Alpine the bloke who started it all saying he was abused a number of times by this man has just admitted he got the wrong man and is blaming police who he says showed him a photo of the man that abused him and told him it was Lord McAlpine,he says he has seen the same photo now and it is not said Lord.
If I was abused and had what I believed was the abusers name who was also a Lord I would without doubt keep up to speed with his appearance just incase our paths ever crossed.I cannot believe this man with access to the net being open to all never once looked at McAlpine for all these years while stating to anyone that would listen that he was a pedo.
Either the accuser is a complete idiot or hes just been paid off
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Merriman Weir
Dear Merriman Weir,
It is not about being a mason and it is not about being gay, the issue must remain focused on pedophiles in power who use those systems to hide. The pedophiles invade every system the can, they invade the churches, they invade the schools, the boy scouts, they invade every system they can and prefer ones that allow them to protect one another. Like Jimmy Saville, they appear to be the most giving, most involved and most caring and that is why they can get away with it, nobody believes the victims.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by lambros56
To be honest, I don't know much about Hillsborough and was even less aware that people had been publicly named, if they had, then fair enough. I haven't seen anything to indicate they were, however.
I am aware of the Sun and Police comments initially following the disaster, which were largely met with widespread derision but the official Taylor report, even in 1990, blamed the Police.
So again, what's your point?
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by The X
I don't know that anyone would defend the character of all masons or all "whatever group you want" without knowing the facts. What is happening here is Freemasons and others trying to let facts and evidence be put out before the lynching happens.
If one, or many people involved in this at any level are in fact masons, they should get far worse punishment than a non member. We hold ourselves to a higher standard. None are above reproach.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
If you apply for a council job in the UK you have to declare whether any family members work in positions of influence, this is to prevent nepotism. Surely we need to press for a declaration of membership to the Freemasons since it has a historical record of being an old boys network based on reciprocal favours.
We need to know who are Freemasons and examine contracts that have been awarded, to see if there is a pattern of reciprocal favours.
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
reply to post by Sk8ergrl
Regarding investigating the BBC, where you do want to start and stop with this? Do you want the Tories as a whole investigated because there's Tories implicated in there (not MacAlpine)? Labour, due to convictions of past councillors etc? The makers of Jimmy Saviles caravan, because he took young children and teenagers in there? The people that sold Savile's remote Glencoe home to him?
You've said yourself "people with power will do bad things", do you want to really investigate every position of power in the country? Every position of authority? All teachers, all doctors, all politicians, all managers, all the Royals, all the judiciary, all prominent businessmen: everyone who can tell someone else what to do?
Welcome to mediaeval Spain!
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
reply to post by Sk8ergrl
Regarding investigating the BBC, where you do want to start and stop with this? Do you want the Tories as a whole investigated because there's Tories implicated in there (not MacAlpine)? Labour, due to convictions of past councillors etc? The makers of Jimmy Saviles caravan, because he took young children and teenagers in there? The people that sold Savile's remote Glencoe home to him?
You've said yourself "people with power will do bad things", do you want to really investigate every position of power in the country? Every position of authority? All teachers, all doctors, all politicians, all managers, all the Royals, all the judiciary, all prominent businessmen: everyone who can tell someone else what to do?
Welcome to mediaeval Spain!
lol they use cameras and listen to our calls and read our emails etc so why not they can't have it both ways they see us as a threat well we see them as a threat as they have the power. So your saying that you agree with pedophilia and that we shouldn't investigate people. If they are found out then they should be in prison. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.edit on 11/10/1212 by Sk8ergrl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
reply to post by Sk8ergrl
Regarding investigating the BBC, where you do want to start and stop with this? Do you want the Tories as a whole investigated because there's Tories implicated in there (not MacAlpine)? Labour, due to convictions of past councillors etc? The makers of Jimmy Saviles caravan, because he took young children and teenagers in there? The people that sold Savile's remote Glencoe home to him?
You've said yourself "people with power will do bad things", do you want to really investigate every position of power in the country? Every position of authority? All teachers, all doctors, all politicians, all managers, all the Royals, all the judiciary, all prominent businessmen: everyone who can tell someone else what to do?
Welcome to mediaeval Spain!
lol they use cameras and listen to our calls and read our emails etc so why not they can't have it both ways they see us as a threat well we see them as a threat as they have the power. So your saying that you agree with pedophilia and that we shouldn't investigate people. If they are found out then they should be in prison. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.edit on 11/10/1212 by Sk8ergrl because: (no reason given)
No, but I am now saying you've poor reasoning skills and jump to ludicrous assumptions. So because I think you're argument is full of holes that I agree with paedophilia.
Never mind, hows that pitchfork and torch coming along? Can you see the windmill yet?
Originally posted by HIWATT
Even if you're the scum of the earth, if you are in the right club and you know the right people, the skids will get greased... and then soon enough you're free to go back to sodomizing children, or whatever else suits your fancy that day
They should all hang by the neck until dead, but not before being tarred, feathered, and set on fire
This should not be used to censor internet freedom ! !