It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
What the BBC doesn't mention is that the real abuser was a relative of Lord McAlpine that has a strong resemblance to him.
"He says: 'After seeing a picture in the past hour of the individual concerned, this [is] not the person I identified by photograph presented to me by the police in the early 1990s, who told me the man in the photograph was Lord McAlpine.' "
It was the police who told him that it was Lord McAlpine.. When it was Jimmy McAlpine. If the police had done their job properly and identified the abuser then this could have been prevented.
Steve Measham doesn't have a thing to apologise for.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by network dude
This thread is about taking an ill-informed rumor and pumping it up to disgusting proportions due to dogmatic fears and ridiculous superstitions.
How many people on this thread even understand the mission of the Freemasons?
Originally posted by Ben81
Some teachers are pedo
Some priests are pedo
Some politicians are pedo
Some freemasons are pedo
Some cops are pedo
Some doctors are pedo
those people should only be responsible to clean bathroom in prison
one day they will have that purpose for the rest of their worthless life
those abusers .. i have no pity for them
they will eventualy pay in this life and in the afterlife
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s cultural fact. We are playing for big stakes here, and the Establishment knows it. A great many senior public figures could find their career histories dramatically changed….along with their daily place of residence.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Slander without a hint of evidence is a criminal offence.edit on 9-11-2012 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MattC
I'm a lurker and rarely post but felt I had to weigh in on this.
Let me see if I can understand the logic brought up in some people's posts.
Some people have been accused of pedophilia
These people are masons
Therefore: All masons are pedophiles
Do you see how illogical that thought process is?
Nearly everyone on UK paedophile ring list is a Freemason says abuse victim
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by newcovenant
Not too surprising from a group that disdains women and will not let them join in their reindeer games.
Now we know why.
Same with the Catholics, but we still trust them to hold confession in little boxes with little boys, yeah?
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by blupblup
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by lifttheveil
If I made a thread about how people who have a camel in their avitar are actually into bestiality and primarily with camels, don't you think you might step up and try to explain how silly that aligation is? Unless............
Do you have video footage of a police chief and councillor saying that this needs to be investigated?
Do you have anything to go on?
If yes, that that would be the same as what you're talking about.
The person your replying to did not "make up" this allegation..... it's out there, on the news... in the REAL WORLD.
This entire thread is a perfect example of why this is wrong. Jimmy Saville is the main person in this investigation. He is NOT a mason, yet the tool in the video, wrongly accuses everyone on the list as being freemasons. How many more are ASSumed to be masons, yet are not, or worse off, wrongfully accused?
Get yer pitchforks and torches bitches.