Message to GOP care of Rachel Maddow

Originally posted by jjkenobi

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by grandmakdw

 

Maddow isn't the first one to say it and it was hardly a rant. It sounded almost pleading.

The truth is that the GOP got it's buttocks handed to it on a plate and she and others are explaining why.

I think it was Haley Barber who said. You know you are in trouble when someone asks you how the "rape" guy is doing and you have to answer "which one?"

What? The GOP didn't get anything handed to them. Did you see the vote count? Did you see the election map of the US county by county? Obama slipped through thanks to Maddow and the rest of the media being 100% in the tank for him.

ITT Fox News supports Barack Obama.

America has always been divided. It's always near 50/50 red/blue. 2012 is no different. Was it different in 2000 when Bush lost the popular vote. The last time it was over 60/40 was 1984 with Ronald Reagan.

reply to post by pyramid head


Yes, I hear what you are saying. A lot of people were disenfranchised because of Romney's implementation of Romneycare in Massachusetts. He is seen as a moderate. What really gets me as a conservative is, people are now saying the GOP should become more like the Democrats to win the hearts of women and minorities. And yet still Romney was portrayed by the liberal media not as a moderate but as a far right wing puppet.
What would be the point of that? What would be the result? A One-Party communist central government bureaucracy, and that is exactly what the elitits want.
I was particularly shocked to hear Charles Krauthammer say today that the GOP should consider amnesty with enforcement. Boehner seems ready for compromise too.
Dennis Miller said that he is comfy and that things have changed in the US and theres nothing we can do about it.

He doesn't seem to realize the communists will come for his money too.

Originally posted by murphy22
reply to post by romney

 

Remember you said that. Dreams and actions are two different things.

Remember, in reality land, Obama does not actually control the economy.

In reality the economy has already done well over 50% of the recovery needed to

Make Obama look mighty good. In reality, Obama could take a two year long nap
And have those results, you should listen to the OP.

reply to post by kaylaluv


You wish to FORCE me by taxes which if I do not pay I go to jail.That is not forcing?
Have I said I was against other religions? I thought I was saying give the same to Christianity you give to others.
I have no problem with any sexual orientations. Just with a religion being FORCED to accept them. If they wish to be married in religion have them do it in another. Why FORCE Christianity to be the religion they are married in?
You wish to stop senseless killings? Have Holder and any others involved with Fast and Furious arrested.

You have proven mine. Again no refutation of what I said. Just accusations again. Everything I said was as valid as what you said. You have not refuted anything I said probably because you can not. It is just that I see things from a different view then you. By the way did I imply you were unworthy or immoral by my words? Please look in a mirror.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


Your mind is filled with paranoid disturbances that are based upon
Fantasy and distortions. Ten gallons of bleach couldn't clean your mind
Of the filth you have in there. The right wing has programmed you
And your cohorts so thoroughlyty, that you cannot accept it when reality
Has thrown you a cold awakening.

It is going to be a really long four years for you, long long long time for things
To recover fully.

reply to post by xedocodex

How about being angry at a government that says if you served your country you are a terrorist? How about a government that says if you believe in the Constitution, the official law of the land, that you are a terrorist? I could go on but why bother. This is from a Democrat controlled government. I think that is a little more then mere mudslinging myself. Actually I am not angry at the government. Just the people running it. It is one thing for a citizen by himself to sling mud, another for those in position of power who can arrest you on a whim. And yes that includes Bush as well.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by pyramid head

 

Yes, I hear what you are saying. A lot of people were disenfranchised because of Romney's implementation of Romneycare in Massachusetts. He is seen as a moderate. What really gets me as a conservative is, people are now saying the GOP should become more like the Democrats to win the hearts of women and minorities. And yet still Romney was portrayed by the liberal media not as a moderate but as a far right wing puppet.
What would be the point of that? What would be the result? A One-Party communist central government bureaucracy, and that is exactly what the elitits want.
I was particularly shocked to hear Charles Krauthammer say today that the GOP should consider amnesty with enforcement. Boehner seems ready for compromise too.
Dennis Miller said that he is comfy and that things have changed in the US and theres nothing we can do about it.

He doesn't seem to realize the communists will come for his money too.

edit on 9-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

We can hope that one of two things will happen if the republicans continually lose:

They actually move towards a republic

A third party becomes strong enough and fills in the void left by them

But to do what libs do and support any idiot because they are from the same party is ignorant. That is what makes them libs. As a conservative I understand the role and function of government and will not stand for either party to preverse it. People will continue to be lazy and uneducated, therefore be manipulated by media puppets. What people fail to recognize is that you do not change government by starting at the president, you start at the local level.

Obozo will do his best to maximize executive power, but if people start putting in true politicians who actually adhere to governent at the local and state levels the president will be irrelevant for the most part. But it starts by getting rid of worthless trash like bohener.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by pyramid head

 

Yes, I hear what you are saying. A lot of people were disenfranchised because of Romney's implementation of Romneycare in Massachusetts. He is seen as a moderate. What really gets me as a conservative is, people are now saying the GOP should become more like the Democrats to win the hearts of women and minorities. And yet still Romney was portrayed by the liberal media not as a moderate but as a far right wing puppet.
What would be the point of that? What would be the result? A One-Party communist central government bureaucracy, and that is exactly what the elitits want.
I was particularly shocked to hear Charles Krauthammer say today that the GOP should consider amnesty with enforcement. Boehner seems ready for compromise too.
Dennis Miller said that he is comfy and that things have changed in the US and theres nothing we can do about it.

He doesn't seem to realize the communists will come for his money too.

edit on 9-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

This post is a real jewel - which communists do you mean?

I assume the fake ass ones you have invented in your mind.

You are the definition of controlled opposition, throw away your

TV and be free.

reply to post by romney

Once again from the left accusations but nothing of substance. No reasoning, no valid arguments, just accusations. Demonizing people with no support. Can you not see what you are doing? Think people before it is to late. What happened to denying ignorance?

reply to post by redtic


if you copy/paste each of those items rachel maddow listed into the search engine here at above top secret, you'd find a wealth of information about each topic.

i agree with what she said. it's time to stop looking at things as red and blue and start looking at things in a calm rational way. what makes sense financially? what makes sense scientifically? we may find the answers will be between the red and the blue.

Originally posted by Jerk_Idiot
reply to post by romney

 

Once again from the left accusations but nothing of substance. No reasoning, no valid arguments, just accusations. Demonizing people with no support. Can you not see what you are doing? Think people before it is to late. What happened to denying ignorance?

That members entire contribution to this thread reads like paranoid drenched
Propaganda. Demonizing that person is all their own doing by posting made up
Bullcrap about secret communists and things. This thread is oozing with support

And Democrats didn't make this election about contraception and abortion, the GOP did.

reply to post by xedocodex




That's really debatable, considering the Obama attack on the freedom of Catholic institutions involving testimony from Sandra Fluke and then inviting Sandra to be a key speaker at the Democratic convention.

reply to post by romney


You realize where chairman maobamas campaign slogan is from dont you? Communism is not a paranoid theory, but a reality.

Originally posted by grandmakdw
reply to post by redtic

 

Way to rip the nation further in two!

A fantastic example of name calling and belittling that hurts our nation so deeply it may never heal from the rift.

Keep it up OP and keep encouraging the split of our nation in two because of intolerance and a non-acceptance of people who hold different ideas than yours.

Way to heal the nation, name calling, ridiculing etc.

How do you respond when a person calls you stupid, ridicules you and puts you down and then tells you to accept their ideas as the correct one? Think about it OP.

This isn't about divisiveness. It's about calling out ignorance and bigotry, and suggesting that if a political demographic group wants to remain relevant, that it needs to start dealing with reality, rather than doubling down on fear, hate, ignorance, misinformation and outright lies. Just look at the proof in the pudding of the presidential polling. Who was correct, unscewedpolls.com, which claimed the polls were biased towards Democrats, or Nate Silver and various other aggregators and analyzers of polling data, whose statistical analyses were essentially spot on?

We're not talking about people with different ideas; we are talking about people with facts on their sides vs. people with outlandish claims. There's big difference. This false equivalence in comparing the rhetoric of the right to that of the left is part of the problem, and you're contributing to it with your response.

As for healing and moving on, it is Republicans still threatening obstruction, as well as blaming the loss of their presidential and senatorial candidates to anything besides their positions and professed beliefs.

And where was the name calling in the OP? False claim on your part.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

And Democrats didn't make this election about contraception and abortion, the GOP did.

reply to post by xedocodex

 

That's really debatable, considering the Obama attack on the freedom of Catholic institutions involving testimony from Sandra Fluke and then inviting Sandra to be a key speaker at the Democratic convention.

No one is threatening the Catholic Church, besides the Church itself, which continues to protect pedophiles and continues to promote political candidates in contradiction of its tax exempt status. As the health care plan is to be implemented, organization not wanting to pay for contraception or abortions won't have to, but it will still be provided by insurance companies. Never mind that individuals' religious and personal freedoms are being attacked by organizations such as the Catholic Church in that it wants to dictate what health care their employees can have, and it and other religious organizations, such as the LDS, want to say who can and cannot get married.

The Catholic Church and the GOP started this discussion. The GOP keeps trying to circumscribe women's health rights and suggesting that women have no rights over their bodies, even in the case of rape, and suggesting that women's bodies can magically abort pregnancies caused by rape, which is completely unsubstantiated by science. No, it was the GOP that started the war on women, and the Democrats are just using political juditsu. It's sour grapes and rank mendacity to claim otherwise.

Originally posted by pyramid head
reply to post by romney

 

You realize where chairman maobamas campaign slogan is from dont you? Communism is not a paranoid theory, but a reality.

Ya, if this were 1982 - It seems as if the lot of Right wing posters on this thread are trying very hard to prove Maddow's point.

It is about as viable as lefties running around stating that the Righties are trying to resurrect the confederacy and Jim Crow.

That is how $#@$@$ stupid this has become

reply to post by romney


What communists? Well, we could start with Van Jones, a self described communist who was recruited for the communist party while in prison. He was part of the Obama administration till he was exposed. Ok, then there's Anita Dunn, also a previous member of the admin, who addressed students saying that she just loved Chairman Mao. Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod. Axelrod is pr guy for Obama and Jarrett is still his senior advisor. Jarrett's grandfather was a personal friend of card carrying Frank Marshall Davis, one of Obama's very personal Marxist communist mentors even spoken of in his own book, Dreams From My Father. Obama's own mother was known to be involved in Marxist studies in a very radical school. Vernon Jarrett, Valerie's father also worked with Davis.
www.breitbart.com...

Here's background on Axelrod

www.discoverthenetworks.org...

roblorinov.wordpress.com...

Axelrod shares a name with a notable Bolshevik. It would however require a deeper look at ancestral roots and history to establish if there is a lineage.

en.wikipedia.org...

Then there is Bill Ayers, a former member of Weather Underground. He and Bernadine Dohrn were involved in domestic terrorist bombings and Dohrn was a radical involved in speaking to students before the Kent State riots. They have involvement with SDS.

Bill and Bernadine raised the son of a Weather Underground couple who actually were convicted and sent to prison. His name is Chesa Boudin and he is chummy with Venezuelan socialist dictator Hugo Chavez. It is reported that Chesa is dating Natalie Portman. Surprise surprise no wonder she likes the Marxist Prez.

WHO: Chesa Jackson Gilbert Boudin is the son of left-wing radicals and Weather Underground members Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert. His parents were incarcerated when he was fourteen months old, leaving him to be raised by Weather Underground members Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers (who had then emerged from hiding). Dohrn and Ayers later adopted Boudin, but he retained a relationship with his birth mother and father. Boudin attended Yale University for his undergraduate years and attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar for graduate school. He speaks and writes regularly on the topic of children with incarcerated parents. He is a Latin Americanist, an anti-war activist, and a writer. He translated into English Understanding the Venezuelan Revolution: Hugo Chávez talks to Marta Harnecker published by Monthly Review Press in November 2005, and co-edited with Dan Berger and Kenyon Farrow Letters from Young Activists: Today’s Rebels Speak Out, published in November by Nation Books. His third book, The Venezuelan Revolution: 100 Questions and 100 Answers is his most recent book, published by Thunder’s Mouth Press in 2006

www.theliberalheretic.com...

So is that enough of a start for you?

reply to post by romney

Demonizing that person is all their own doing by posting made up

Secret communists. lol it's all come out in the open by now. You can just google it all. Why don't you just google Chesa Boudin and Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. Made up posting? The only thing suspect here is your registration on ATS 11/7/2012

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by romney

 

What communists? Well, we could start with Van Jones, a self described communist who was recruited for the communist party while in prison. He was part of the Obama administration till he was exposed. Ok, then there's Anita Dunn, also a previous member of the admin, who addressed students saying that she just loved Chairman Mao. Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod. Axelrod is pr guy for Obama and Jarrett is still his senior advisor. Jarrett's grandfather was a personal friend and of card carrying Frank Marshall Davis, one of Obama's very personal Marxist communist mentors even spoken of in his own book, Dreams From My Father. Obama's own mother was known to be involved in Marxist studies in a very radical school. Vernon Jarrett, Valerie's father also worked with Davis.
www.breitbart.com...

Here's background on Axelrod

www.discoverthenetworks.org...

roblorinov.wordpress.com...

Axelrod shares a name with a notable Bolshevik. It would however require a deeper look at ancestral roots and history to establish if there is a lineage.

en.wikipedia.org...

Then there is Bill Ayers, a former member of Weather Underground. He and Bernadine Dohrn were involved in domestic terrorist bombings and Dohrn was a radical involved in speaking to students before the Kent State riots. They have involvement with SDS.

Bill and Bernadine raised the son of a Weather Underground couple who actually were convicted and sent to prison. His name is Chesa Boudin and he is chummy with Venezuelan socialist dictator Hugu Chavez. It is reported that Chesa is dating Natalie Portman. Surprise surprise no wonder she likes the Marxist Prez.

WHO: Chesa Jackson Gilbert Boudin is the son of left-wing radicals and Weather Underground members Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert. His parents were incarcerated when he was fourteen months old, leaving him to be raised by Weather Underground members Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers (who had then emerged from hiding). Dohrn and Ayers later adopted Boudin, but he retained a relationship with his birth mother and father. Boudin attended Yale University for his undergraduate years and attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar for graduate school. He speaks and writes regularly on the topic of children with incarcerated parents. He is a Latin Americanist, an anti-war activist, and a writer. He translated into English Understanding the Venezuelan Revolution: Hugo Chávez talks to Marta Harnecker published by Monthly Review Press in November 2005, and co-edited with Dan Berger and Kenyon Farrow Letters from Young Activists: Today’s Rebels Speak Out, published in November by Nation Books. His third book, The Venezuelan Revolution: 100 Questions and 100 Answers is his most recent book, published by Thunder’s Mouth Press in 2006

www.theliberalheretic.com...

So is that enough of a start for you?

No, that is a load of malarky frankly ~

That is hearsay that you have gathered from rightwing sources who make a living, making people like you
scared and paranoid. How many books have you read on the subject? You do realize people make money catering to you?

Communism as a viable political idea died with the Soviet Union.

Last I checked, I paid a private company for my gas, oil, groceries, insurance, TV, Internet, shoes, cloths,
computer and the like.

So WTF are you talking about?

Where is the secret communism?

It must be SO secret it is undetectable.

reply to post by romney


Malarkey says WHO! Obama and Axelrod??? Are you their spokesman?

Communism as a viable political idea died with the Soviet Union

Oh yes and that is why Van Jones is a self described communist today.

In March 2009 Jones was appointed by President Barack Obama to the newly created position of Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality, where he worked with various "agencies and departments to advance the administration's climate and energy initiatives, with a special focus on improving vulnerable communities."[6][7] In July 2009 he became "embroiled in a controversy"[8] over his past political activities, including a public comment disparaging congressional Republicans, his name appearing on a petition for 911Truth.org, and allegations of association with a Marxist group during the 1990s.[9][10] For these issues, Van Jones was heavily criticized by conservatives.[11] Jones resigned from the position in early September 2009.[8

en.wikipedia.org...

But why don't you just take his own words for it

Jones says he became politically radicalized in the aftermath of the deadly April 1992 Los Angeles riots which erupted shortly after four L.A. police officers who had beaten the now-infamous Rodney King were exonerated in court. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th,” says Jones, “and then the verdicts came down on April 29th. By August, I was a communist.”

Recalling his brief incarceration, Jones says: “I met all these young radical people of color. I mean really radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’ I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.”

www.discoverthenetworks.org...

So far you are punting and I am hitting out of the ballpark on this particular issue