It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GideonFaith
I will disagree to semen and cutting hair as meaning you are taking human life away. Where does that even make sense?? So, you think even cutting your fingernails would be taking human life?
I think we all pay into programs for single and married women by paying our taxes.
So, if other lazy human lives would take care of their children, this issue
When a woman has an abortion, human life is taken away.
the discussion would be over
Originally posted by GideonFaith
The government has several programs available to single parents. Single parents have more rights today, help with childcare, welfare, food stamps, housing plans
As for the children in Africa, nothing bad towards them, but we have too many problems in America
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by GideonFaith
I will disagree to semen and cutting hair as meaning you are taking human life away. Where does that even make sense?? So, you think even cutting your fingernails would be taking human life?
Why not, unless you are to claim that DNA is not human life? You don't think semen is human life? Because if it isn't, there shouldn't be any need for it when it comes to the cycle of pregnancy, right?
What exactly do you think human life is? You're not one of those people who believe it's another term for human being do you?
I think we all pay into programs for single and married women by paying our taxes.
You pay for those social programmes to support single mothers because it's a requirement, it's a mandate, that you do so. You don't do so for purely voluntary reasons, infact many pro-lifers are rallying against these very programmes which is ironic. Many State governments are even cutting into these programmes.
Where's your posts about those poor children suffering out there from hunger, disease? Where's your post about saving these social programmes, improving it, so that more future mothers would go forward with their pregnancies knowing they'd have the support? huh?
So, if other lazy human lives would take care of their children, this issue
So your position is that women *must* go forward with these pregnancies, and what, they *must* look after them? Do you think preaching and lecturing to them your morals and ethics like you are now is doing anything to change the cycle of abortions there? Do you think you posting on this board is changing the cycle of poverty out there?
Lazy humans? You think only lazy people choose abortions? This is a typical argument from "pro-lifers", they have a narrow view of why women choose abortions.
This is your argument essentially:
"abortion is murder, these women are murders, choose adoption, problem solved"
You aren't going to stop abortions this way, sorry.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by GideonFaith
The government has several programs available to single parents. Single parents have more rights today, help with childcare, welfare, food stamps, housing plans
You seem to think our social programmes are secure when they aren't. We have a broken system, a broken government, we have poverty in this country. Merely claiming that the government will pick up the pieces, while ignoring the attempts by groups (many of whom include pro-life advocates) to cut these very programmes, is outside of reality. You also ignoring the fact that abortion is chose for other reasons, it also comes down to rights because we're not talking about your body here. You're crossing the topics of rape, molestation, threat to the life of the mother, you're talking about 9 months of pregnancy.
You can't expect to provide such narrowminded arguments and solutions to abortion because it is a complex issue.
As for the children in Africa, nothing bad towards them, but we have too many problems in America
It doesn't matter if we're discussing children in Africa, we're still discussing the life of human beings at the end of the day. Being a true pro-lifer doesn't end at the American border, it isn't about nationality, cultural and continental identity. Either you are a pro-lifer or you're not.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Quadrivium
No, because they aren't human beings, just like fertilized eggs aren't. Do you get it now?
Why? Because you don't like your beliefs being taken apart piece by piece and actually examined?
It's so easy to sit on the internet and use such narrowminded arguments such as "abortion is murder". It's easy because you don't put much thought behind those arguments.
You're more than welcome to rejoin me in this debate when you feel you're up to it again, I'm not going anywhere, and I'm not interested in "winning arguments" either as I take the argument of life very seriously.
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by GideonFaith
It's real simple, here goes. Well one night my daddy and mama decided to become intimate. During this process, I was created. Where the sperm meets the egg and cells start to divide, yep, that was me! I thank them everyday for giving me life.
Cancer and bed bugs too.
Are they sentient beings? Do they have a soul consciousness?
Is the consciousness built into the cells of the physical? Or - - maybe its the chemicals in our brains.
NO - - it is not that simple.
To you, its not that simple. But to me, it is very simple. If you need to read it again, see above. IMHO all the other garbage you have up there is just that, GARBAGE.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by GideonFaith
It's real simple, here goes. Well one night my daddy and mama decided to become intimate. During this process, I was created. Where the sperm meets the egg and cells start to divide, yep, that was me! I thank them everyday for giving me life.
Cancer and bed bugs too.
Are they sentient beings? Do they have a soul consciousness?
Is the consciousness built into the cells of the physical? Or - - maybe its the chemicals in our brains.
NO - - it is not that simple.
To you, its not that simple. But to me, it is very simple. If you need to read it again, see above. IMHO all the other garbage you have up there is just that, GARBAGE.
Why do we exist at all?
If there is no reason for our existence - - what does it matter?
Cancer is a living thing just trying to exist - - but we aggressively try to stop its existence.
One could consider over population and irresponsible procreation a "cancer" on humanity.
GARBAGE? You want to refer to something as garbage? Try all the abandoned - abused - and uncared for already LIVING CHILDREN in this world.
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Can the items you are stating that is human life, make a another life?
I also think this topic is about abortion
Birth control can stop most abortions,
Also if you create a human life or being, you are responsible for making sure that life can grow and prosper.
Your belief
This is the reason the discussion is over
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Can the items you are stating that is human life, make a another life?
Depends what you mean by this. Have you heard of cloning? They've been successful with cloning sheep in this area. If your argument is that can human life naturally produce human beings, well human beings can do this naturally (provided we're speaking of the opposite sex) because they form part of that definition of "human life".
I also think this topic is about abortion
The core part to debating the issue of abortion is that of debating human rights, defining what a human being is. Incase you didn't know, children are considered human beings, and if one is to argue the "right to life" for all "human beings" then this argument extends to children and adult human beings outside the womb, those who are not granted that right to live, through way of poverty, neglect.
Being a true pro-lifer doesn't end with the womb.
Birth control can stop most abortions,
What do you mean it can stop most abortions? Birth control already prevents most cases of abortions, most people already use birth control you know? Yes the availability of more birth control will help bring down that number more so, but it's not going to completely end abortions. There are many reasons as to why women choose the path of abortions, birth control isn't always an option and it doesn't always work.
Also if you create a human life or being, you are responsible for making sure that life can grow and prosper.
I agree and disagree. While I believe that it is the better option to go with pregnancy, to give it a chance, I would not anyway believe a rape victim is "responsible" for her further" responsibility. Frankly it's none of my business and it's none of yours. These victims don't owe anybody anything, they don't owe you anything, they don't have to take *responsibility* for a crime they suffered through.
As for women in other cases, I'd like them to take responsibility as I feel pregnancy is always the better choice, but it's not my place to tell them what to do with their bodies. It's not my place to tell you what you *must* do with your body. The pro-life argument was lost 30 years ago, the decision comes down to the woman herself and it will always come down to her and her alone.
Now, if you want continue preaching about how all women should take responsibility for pregnancy and not have abortions, be my guest, but you're not really making a case to them for the benefits of being mothers. Instead you're just lecturing them with your morals, and this kind of attitude has not gotten the pro-life movement anywhere over the 3 decades. At some point pro-lifers are going to have to ask themselves why women aren't listening to their lectures and insults. Maybe because they don't really offer solutions, and they don't offer support either, just arguments and insults.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Annee
Pro-lifers (the ones who believe all women and children should be shamed and/or punished if they choose abortion) seem to have a sense of moral superiority. Once you go outside the womb, there's litte to no motivation for them to bother investing even half the time on preserving the life of human beings because:
A) It's going to actually cost them
B) It doesn't allow them to dictate what others *must* do
C) It does nothing to feed their egos and their sense of moral superiority.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Quad! Why am I not surprised that you've decided to coming running back to me with more of your arguments?
So much for ending the debate I guess.
It's not my belief, it's a fact. If you want to continue living in this delusion I can't force you to think otherwise.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
This is a highly emotive subject in a highly emotive thread.
It polarises people like most no other subject.
We all have free will..so in theory God allows us any action.
But society rightly sets rules in order to maintain order and protect the well being of human beings.
Law reflects human will.
The argument is when does a human being become a living being?
But the question always should be would you have wanted your mother to have terminated you.
Where would you be now if that had happenned?
Here on ATS reading this thread?
No you would be dead.
That is just my view on this subject.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Snuffing someones life is not being responsible or an act of unselfishness.
This is not simply the free will of women only. That in its self is ignorant and selfish.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
But the question always should be would you have wanted your mother to have terminated you.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Wrong SG, It would be correct to say that it is YOUR belief
One thing you’ll notice is the frantic attempt to qualify everything by inserting the qualifier “human” before every mention of the word “life”, to the point where they are even adding it when quoting me! Alas, it doesn’t help them at all. I’m also confident that the freshly fertilized zygote is not human, either. There’s more to being human than bearing a cell with the right collection of genes.
If YOU can stop putting words in my mouth