It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're confusing the second level of Maslow's heirarchy, security of resources, with the first level: security of person. It's the need to establish shelter, and to protect one's offspring. If you have no food, you will have a hunger threat. If someone threatens to take your food, you have a second-level security threat. As we develop through the heirarchy we differentiate ourselves from our fellow man. In a collective, it is only those things which every man (and/or woman) has in common which contributes to the collective intellect.
Originally posted by herrw
First thread here, so be gentle.
My major field of study is in the dynamics of large and small collectives, something I've studied for many years. No, I'm not an academician. I'm an author and a poet and a playwrite and a damn hard working individual. But it would be wrong of me not to share what I've developed with others who might listen.
Part of the study of collectives is understanding how they respond to different types of threats. Collectives almost always respond in the same manner to the same stimuli, because when a dissimilar group of individuals gather together for action their common attributes determine the nature of the collective intellect. As they have little in common, this tends to be the subconcious motivations. Specific to this problem are hunger threats, safety threats, and moral threats. I have social equations for these, and would be pleased to share them with anyone who wishes (although I don't know how to draw equations in BBcode).
Hunger threats result in a tendency for revolution.
Security threats result in a tendency for violence.
Moral threats result in a tendency for destruction.
To understand where we are headed in the next many days, one must understand where we are first. We have trillions of dollars in print, but none are being spent. These are dammed up behind the banks like a leaking reservoir. We must print this money to support a citizenry which cannot support itself after economic collapse. If we did not do so, it would result in revolution. (hunger threat) Additionally, we are constantly reminded of the possibility of security threats. The government must respond (even ineffectively) or violence will erupt. Finally, we have devided western society into two moral camps--progressive liberalism and social conservatism--which can neither communicate effectively nor abide each other's presence.
So here's what you're looking at as a catastrophe, if you're the fear porn type.
First, the stock market will recover on positive news. It will jump wildly upward, and all reports will herald the end of the great recession. This is not the end. This is the beginning of the end.
Next, business spikes. This will take all of a week. Banks will loosen their hold on their reserves of cash. That cash is worthless to them unless it is used, but up until this point they've been afraid to take the risk of releasing it.
The cash drops into the economy like an atomic bomb, destroying everything around it. With so much cash in circulation, the price of everything is going to skyrocket. And the keynesians in the fed will be able to understand nothing other than a continuation of the same policies. This is the trigger.
With hyper inflation, several things must happen. a) revolutionary feelings will erupt (hunger threat) b)The military must be withdrawn from active combat (nothing to pay them with, and they're needed to enforce the peace. c) most importantly, infrastructure must fail.
That last one requires some explanation. The Western economy operates on the supposition that products from anywhere in the world may be quickly transferred to anywhere else in the world. When the price of goods skyrockets, so will the price of fuel. Without the input of cheap(ish) energy, product transportation will all but cease.
Finally, consider that western society has been in moral conflict with eastern society and middle-eastern society for centuries. Given the sudden weakness, I expect war to break out. Not in the middle east, but in Spain, Turkey, Armenia, and Serbia... areas where the tensions are high and the mixture of morally opposed collectives is strong. This starts a bloody conflict which has to sweep the world, if through nothing other than contageon. And moral wars mean killing, and that includes mommies and daddies and babies and puppies.
Finally, the warring forces collapse. Without the transport of food, the will to fight (even when driven by the supposed prestige of God) will eventually falter and fail. By that time we will have been knocked backwards at least 100 years, much as Europe was after WWII. This time there will be no superpowers to rebuild, however. The superpowers will be smoking ruins.
That's my first post. Sorry if it's a downer.
Originally posted by Miccey
Originally posted by Lonewulph
reply to post by herrw
Just a matter of days?
Well done first post. Thanks for educating the people, but I don't think neither Obama or Romney, and their supporters, got the memo...
They just keep telling us, don't worry....be happy...everything's gonna be okie dokey.
At what point will the 'off world security forces' that are mentioned in the other 'Gary Mckinnon Hacker' thread be called in?edit on 20-10-2012 by Lonewulph because: (no reason given)
Troll alot??
Ive gained some insight by this thread, and even gained some
"ok i wasnt so off". Been thinking alot about this aswell.
And SOMETHING is about, around the corner so to speak...
Gutfeelings are good indicators...
Originally posted by herrw
Originally posted by Miccey
Originally posted by Lonewulph
reply to post by herrw
Just a matter of days?
Well done first post. Thanks for educating the people, but I don't think neither Obama or Romney, and their supporters, got the memo...
They just keep telling us, don't worry....be happy...everything's gonna be okie dokey.
At what point will the 'off world security forces' that are mentioned in the other 'Gary Mckinnon Hacker' thread be called in?edit on 20-10-2012 by Lonewulph because: (no reason given)
Troll alot??
Ive gained some insight by this thread, and even gained some
"ok i wasnt so off". Been thinking alot about this aswell.
And SOMETHING is about, around the corner so to speak...
Gutfeelings are good indicators...
I try not to run with gut feelings, but thank you for the kind words.
My equations could very well be way off mark. As I said, they are relational rather than mathematical. However, they are based on the premise that collectives function in much the same way most of the time. Central to the equations is the series P(xT/d^2), where d=time, x=nature (hunger, moral, etc), T=severity of threat, and P= prestige, although P may be applied to any area of the equation. I really wish ATS had a function wherein I could upload a rtf file to show them. I would love the feedback.
I have social equations for these, and would be pleased to share them with anyone who wishes (although I don't know how to draw equations in BBcode).
Eh, we're going to simply have to wait and see. I think you're off the mark. The national leadership is not what is on C-SPAN. It's all show for the time being. Once the dollar collapses, martial law will be declared, and policies for continuance of government will be put in place. It's all in public view for anyone who cares to check.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by moniesisfun
Our current world leadership, the ICBs, are a bunch of psychopaths. They know nothing about reality. The only thing they know is corporate politics, how to lie, cheat, and steal to get their way.
This is why, instead of us all living the good life, due to the advancements of technology, working short hours and spending more time with our families, we are all trapped in a giant rat maze, to chase the cheddar.
Even though we are all already fattened.
Originally posted by sio2yh2o
Nice of you to show up herrw - where have I heard this type of analysis before.....television, Internet show....hmmmmm Oh well.
I think you know as well as the rest of us that the powers that be are aware and this is in fact by design. I would suggest that the timetable has been moved up due to several unforseen (but not uncalculated) events and that North America will actually fair much better (a softer landing) than the rest of the globe.
Remember - the intagibles of human nature can not be predicted.
Better calrity and logic than I could ever produce.
Thanks.
Originally posted by herrw
Individual free will may make micro-prediction all but impossible, but groups of individuals follow set patterns which are dependent both upon their initial formulation and their mode of communication.