It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by charles1952
I can't remember anything that has so thoroughly nauseated me as this report. From the source:
For a "temporary" "unverifiable" promise from Iran? The country known for breaking promises left and right?
The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.
The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.
I have at least half a dozen words to describe this, none of which are allowed by T&C. An opening for peace? HAH! Fools. I just can't type anymore, I'm sick.
Does Israel know about this ?
The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
For the record, WND sucks as a source. This, if true, does reek of back door deals to get votes at the expense of US security.
It reeks for sure. (OCTOBER)
Doesn't mean that is won't help us out.
Tell me at what expense are we paying for this??
Could we not blow them up at any time??
Way Side Note (just now seeing Obama on john stewart...) Playing for the women's vote.. Gawd I wish we had real candidates..edit on 10/19/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)
Obama promises to lay off, he does, Iran then completes their nuclear program while Obama looks the other way. We now have a nuclear Iran and in a similar situation we are in with a nuclear North Korea.
Obama got his votes, now the rest of us pay.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by marbles87
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
For the record, WND sucks as a source. This, if true, does reek of back door deals to get votes at the expense of US security.
It reeks for sure. (OCTOBER)
Doesn't mean that is won't help us out.
Tell me at what expense are we paying for this??
Could we not blow them up at any time??
Way Side Note (just now seeing Obama on john stewart...) Playing for the women's vote.. Gawd I wish we had real candidates..edit on 10/19/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)
Obama promises to lay off, he does, Iran then completes their nuclear program while Obama looks the other way. We now have a nuclear Iran and in a similar situation we are in with a nuclear North Korea.
Obama got his votes, now the rest of us pay.
What is so wrong with NK or Iran having a nuke? The ONLY reason anyone has one is to keep other countries from messing with them, nothing more.
Yes, so NK can keep attacking the South, keep making demands, keep saying give us food and we will be good, then going on a tirade about obliterating the South, all without fear of repurcussion. You're right, that's ideal.
Iran can openly support terrorist groups. Iran can invade their neighbors. Iran can do almost anything they want. Then if we threaten them they pull back and say stop at our borders or we will nuke Israel. Nuke SA. Nuke Turkey. You're right, that's not a problem.