It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This story (if we're accepting it as true) is about a deal. A deal has give and take on both sides. I assume you're saying that as a result of this deal we won't have war, or, at least we won't have it so soon.
You are so freaking anti Obama that you even turn good news into something derogatory.
US President Bill Clinton's administration knew Rwanda was being engulfed by genocide in April 1994 but buried the information to justify its inaction, according to classified documents made available for the first time. Senior officials privately used the word genocide within 16 days of the start of the killings, but chose not to do so publicly because the president had already decided not to intervene.
Fear of a repeat of the events in Somalia shaped US policy in subsequent years, with many commentators identifying the graphic consequences of the Battle of Mogadishu as the key reason behind the US's failure to intervene in later conflicts such as the Rwandan Genocide of 1994.
Originally posted by auto73912621
Looks like the story was correct, another one!
article.wn.com...
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by auto73912621
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
S&F
Assume, just for the moment, that the first sentence is true. It seems to follow then, that the second sentence would be true and reasonable. So, if you're objecting, it can only be to the first sentence.
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
post by yourignoranceisbliss
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by auto73912621
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
S&F
This has to be the absolute DUMBEST THING I've read all year.
Seriously.
If this doesn't out you and your politically-correct clone Wrabbit 2k as Israeli shills, I don't know what will.
post by Hawking
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by auto73912621
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
S&F
Try not to be so predictable it makes you look stupid
post by zigoapex
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by auto73912621
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
S&F
Their is dumb republican tea-bagger thinking at it's finest !
Originally posted by yourignoranceisbliss
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by auto73912621
The Iranian leadership realises how weak the Obama administration is. So it would be in their best interests to do anything they could to keep Obama in office.
S&F
This has to be the absolute DUMBEST THING I've read all year.
Seriously.
If this doesn't out you and your politically-correct clone Wrabbit 2k as Israeli shills, I don't know what will.
Originally posted by neo96
edit on 20-10-2012 by neo96 because: nevermind the letters from my post were redistributed to the more needy
Originally posted by neo96
edit on 20-10-2012 by neo96 because: nevermind the letters from my post were redistributed to the more needy
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by neo96
edit on 20-10-2012 by neo96 because: nevermind the letters from my post were redistributed to the more needy
Redistribution is wrong! Neo earned those words!
The government didn't "spell" that!