The Homosexual Agenda

You got me confused now Grady, so are you saying the white supremists DO represent your views?

Why do simple yes or no questions seem to be the hardest for people to answer?

Damn itchy trigger finger, double post~

[edit on 21-10-2004 by W_HAMILTON]

Originally posted by Amuk
You got me confused now Grady, so are you saying the white supremists DO represent your views?

Where would you get that idea? You asked me to post something that would refute the idea that "White Supremacists" speak for all whites and I posted a site that supports, if not proves, that they do not, as this is an organization of whites who reject the "privileged status" of "whiteness."

You are not trying to engage me in productive discussion. You are trying to entrap me and beyond that, you are way off topic.

A book about getting rid of the white "race" is proof that we arent racists? That doesnt prove ANYTING but a group of people want to get rid of the white people, if anything it just proves the SECOND part of my post, "A Black Agenda".

I noticed you STILL havent answered the question I am starting to think I know why. How is answering a yes or no question entrapment?

As for the topic I am merely posting that we should give no more belief to these fools than to the ones on my thread. It is not a refutement of your post but just an example of the same BS from several different sources.

I know you wont answer this one either but again why should this thread have ANY more creditality than mine?

[edit on 21-10-2004 by Amuk]

I am not a racial supremacist of any kind. On your topic of proof, the organization does prove that white supremacists to not speak for all whites, as does this organization:

www.erace.com...

So, you see. People could start posting substantive arguments to my post, instead of just attacking me. Of course, the former requires thought and effort and the latter does not.

Believe it or not my posts were not intended to attack YOU but to attack the logic behind your posts, which seems to be that since some Gays say this ALL gays must believe it.

My point is since white supremists dont represent YOUR point of view, not to mention MINE or 99% of other whites, why should the ravings of a few Gays represent ALL gays? You can find "PROOF" that nazis have moon bases and all our leaders are shapeshifting reptiles on the internet.

Can you say why this has ANY more creditabilty than my thread?

Here is web site that refutes your post

www.pfaw.org...

[edit on 21-10-2004 by Amuk]

Originally posted by Amuk
Believe it or not my posts were not intended to attack YOU but to attack the logic behind your posts, which seems to be that since some Gays say this ALL gays must believe it.

I never said anything remotely related to this statement. My only intent was to foster discussion.

Grady, is it your opinion that if you're not presented with a website refuting the ideas of this fanatic group, it is to be considered proof of approval by the gay community?

See my post above for a link refuting your post.

And again the magic question you have refused to answer

Why do they represent ALL gays and the Neo-Nazis not represent us?

Here it is again for the lazy

www.pfaw.org...

It took me a while since I normally dont go to gay web sites

[edit on 21-10-2004 by Amuk]

Amuk, I have found that conservatives are not lazy, just don't like being proven wrong and will do everything they can to be from corrected. Sorry Amuk, it is nice to think they are just lazy, gives us a reason to try harder.

Gee Grady, you sure do spend a lot of time perusing homosexual and white supremacist websites...

Here is a list of more PROOF of Christians planning on taking ovr the world an other parts of it.
www.holysmoke.org/wicca/fire01.htm
www.freeroller.net/page/grego/20040825
www.skepticfiles.org/mys2/fire01as.htm
www.spiegel.de/spiegel/english/0,1518,236692,00.html
www.web-ministry.com/fff.php
www.angelfire.com/fl3/uraniamanu.lies.html
www.afa.net/journal/novdec/2002/noi.asp
www.eurolegal.org/useur/usneocon3.htm
sleazereport.com...

I guess gays are the least to worry about.

And herer is one linking the Republican party with a Christian plot to kill gays and enslave sinners. Its on the internet so it MUST be true

www.4religious-right.info...

Enforcing Biblical Law
Frederick Clarkson reports on the views of Rev. Joseph Morecraft on life and government. Rev. Morecraft is pastor of the Reconstructionist Chalcedon Presbyterian Church in Marietta, Georgia.

"In his book, and especially when speaking at the 1993 Biblical World View and Christian Education Conference, Morecraft discussed with relish the police power of the state. His belief in the persecution of nonbelievers and those who are insufficiently orthodox is crystal clear. Morecraft described democracy as "mob rule," and stated that the purpose of "civil government" is to "terrorize evil doers. . . to be an avenger!" he shouted, "To bring down the wrath of God to bear on all those who practice evil!"

"And how do you terrorize an evil doer?" he asked. "You enforce Biblical law!" The purpose of government, he said, is "to protect the church of Jesus Christ," and, "Nobody has the right to worship on this planet any other God than Jehovah. And therefore the state does not have the responsibility to defend anybody's pseudo-right to worship an idol!" "There ain't no such thing" as religious pluralism, he declared. Further, "There has never been such a condition in the history of mankind. There is no such place now. There never will be." "What is Christian Reconstructionism?" by Frederick Clarkson, The Public Eye.

Does this represent the veiws of the Republican party?

[edit on 21-10-2004 by Amuk]

Originally posted by Amuk
Why do they represent ALL gays and the Neo-Nazis not represent us?

Amuk

Have you ever heard of perseveration? Nowhere have I suggested that anyone speaks for everyone.

My question to you all is, Why is my opinion so important?

Present your own views.

Originally posted by Durden
Grady, is it your opinion that if you're not presented with a website refuting the ideas of this fanatic group, it is to be considered proof of approval by the gay community?

Nowhere have I suggested such a thing.

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
My question to you all is, Why is my opinion so important?

Present your own views.

You started this "gays are out to have sex with your kids take over the world and kill everyone that is not gay" thread and you wonder why people would ask YOUR opinion of the thread YOU started.

Good way to dodge ANY responsabilty for your OWN posts

Originally posted by GradyPhilpottMy question to you all is, Why is my opinion so important?

Thats the strategy m8, just look at my posts and how they keep asking the same things over and over....do you eat pork etc......

Thats the way when there is no ground to stand on, this method actually made it into the DNC manual this year.

Even if you loose and their is no cheating, claim there is and declare yourself the winner...


Not all here are like that , those who are know WHO you are......

Grady .........good job.

Originally posted by Amuk
Good way to dodge ANY responsabilty for your OWN posts...

I take full responsibility for my posts. Why would I not?

Many have claimed that there is no gay agenda. Many have claimed that the agenda is only about equality. Others claim that the agenda is all about destroying the traditional and replacing it with the revolutionary. This should be a discussion of the social movements associated with Homosexuality.

Originally posted by edsinger
[Even if you loose and their is no cheating, claim there is and declare yourself the winner...
.

Or we could just say because MY invisable friend said so in his book so EVERYONE must believe

Neither of you even have to backbone to tell me why this thread should have anymore creditabilty than the ones I posted about other groups agenda

You know why?

Because this thread is based on just as much BS as the others are and you know it. You pick the words of a few fanatics and imply that they speak for EVERYONE