It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by msfitte
reply to post by Lightbringer38
Not sure what reaction you're looking for. The "do what you love/what makes you happy" is nice in theory but in practice it just doesn't work that way.
Originally posted by Wolf321
reply to post by nothingwrong
I understand the premise of doing what you love, it is just unrealistic. The world I describe is not my conception of it, it is reality. The nature of reality is there is only one. Perspective can change from person to person but reality remains constant. Example: A person can die. One relative may view their passing as moving on to another realm. Another may simply see it as an end of a life. Either way, the person is simply dead.
I hope that my children will find work doing something they love, but I don't tell them that it is the more likely outcome. I brace them for the fact that work is work, the best you can hope for in life is finding your skills and talents and putting those to work to provide for your necessities.
This idea that simply doing what you want is enough is dangerous. It is just like when I hear someone tell a person who is interested in opening a business to do or sell what they are interested in. That is just about the worst advice you can give someone who is considering a business. Rule no.1 is there has to be a market. If I want to sell handmade pink bunny pencil toppers, without a market, I will lose a lot of money, time and be heartbroken with failure.
The advice shouldn't be do something that makes you happy. It should be do something useful.
Originally posted by msfitte
reply to post by Lightbringer38
Not sure what reaction you're looking for. The "do what you love/what makes you happy" is nice in theory but in practice it just doesn't work that way.
It's no surprise to me that many of those the narrator questioned want to do things in the arts realm. Artistic things of all types feed the soul but when you've got kids to literally feed as well, the soul needs to take a backseat no matter how depressing it becomes
Wally Wannawrite may be just as talented and committed to crafting stories as Stephen King, but for whatever reason never got the buzz or big following to make it profitable. So he goes about his 40 or more hours a week doing whatever it takes for himself and his family to survive. And if he's lucky he has enough energy and brain power on his hours off to write for himself and maybe publish for those who know about and appreciate his work.
Originally posted by nothingwrong
Originally posted by Wolf321
reply to post by nothingwrong
I understand the premise of doing what you love, it is just unrealistic. The world I describe is not my conception of it, it is reality. The nature of reality is there is only one. Perspective can change from person to person but reality remains constant. Example: A person can die. One relative may view their passing as moving on to another realm. Another may simply see it as an end of a life. Either way, the person is simply dead.
I hope that my children will find work doing something they love, but I don't tell them that it is the more likely outcome. I brace them for the fact that work is work, the best you can hope for in life is finding your skills and talents and putting those to work to provide for your necessities.
This idea that simply doing what you want is enough is dangerous. It is just like when I hear someone tell a person who is interested in opening a business to do or sell what they are interested in. That is just about the worst advice you can give someone who is considering a business. Rule no.1 is there has to be a market. If I want to sell handmade pink bunny pencil toppers, without a market, I will lose a lot of money, time and be heartbroken with failure.
The advice shouldn't be do something that makes you happy. It should be do something useful.
Well we will have to agree to disagree. For me the real danger is trying to confirm to a broken system. "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society"
You can teach your children to be 'realistic' or you can teach them to be real. prepare them for a life of toil, being a wage slave for 2 weeks holiday a year somewhere in the sun, if they are lucky. Or teach them to follow theeir hopes and their dreams, concentrating on what they love, so that they can find fulfillment. How much money you have is not a measure of success. How much love you have is far more important.
Originally posted by Doodle19815
He says the same thing I have felt forever. For some reason we live for money. I just don't get it.
Good video,
Originally posted by definity
Yeah if money was no object we would have an amazingly efficient society.
Cancer and most medical problems would probably be cured by now.
Poverty would not exist.
People would eat healthy food.
Best medical care for everyone.
All medical research would only be limited by the minds that are in it.
Best education for everyone, at any age.
Technology research would be unlimited, it would be like Star Trek in like 20 years.
Free to go where you want, when you want.
Crime would drop super dramatically. Most crime is based on ideas of how to make money. Unless it is an emotional/passion crime E.G someone who has physically/mentally hurt you in the past present and they want revenge like murder.
And most importantly for NO MORE DEBT FOR ANYONE!!!
But this is unpractical, while people have money, money will always have power.
There needs to be a revolution.
edit on 25-9-2012 by definity because: (no reason given)