It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Originally posted by AJ1123TKE
I seriously don't understand what joy a publication get's out of publishing stuff like this especially with the current ME situation over the film.
Like are they TRYING to insight outrage and riots and people getting killed?
didn't the media learn its lesson after South Park made fun of Mohammed and someone nearly bombed Comedy Central HQ in times square with a failed truck bomb?
That said, the conspiracy theorist inside of me says this all smells AWFULLY fished and orchestrated to me... and wouldn't be surprised if this was part of a larger scale "planned" event.
Nothing should be 'off limits' to talk about, draw about, or think about. This is one of the many problems I have with religion. The entire 'my prophet and beliefs are more right than yours' has caused so much death and suffering in the world it's ridiculous.
So it causes outrage and and riots, that is no fault of the person/group who is sharing an idea. Whether it is supposed to be comedic or serious, bottom line is 'so what.'
You mention the South Park situation and all I can do is roll my eyes, not really at you, but about how it all played out. What do you mean people can't animate/draw/mention a certain prophet, no matter which one it is?
It's mind baffling to me that anyone would have these beliefs. So this prophet, in his almighty wisdom and greatness at one point said 'DON'T MAKE CARTOONS OR ANYTHING ABOUT ME OR ELSE," right...seems legit.
Originally posted by MisterFister103
I would not be willing to sacrifice my loved ones over someone's right to draw a picture of some prophet.
Originally posted by Miri08
Originally posted by MisterFister103
I would not be willing to sacrifice my loved ones over someone's right to draw a picture of some prophet.
It's really not just about someone's right to draw a picture of some prophet. Do you realize how many people have died to give us the right to draw a picture of some prophet?
And further more these extremists have proven that if they weren't rioting and be violent over this, they would find another reason to be violent. Sure we could all bow down and kiss their collective derrieres on this issue but I can guarantee you that will not stop the violence and will only leave a nasty aftertaste.
edit on 18-9-2012 by Miri08 because: appalling grammar
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Originally posted by AJ1123TKE
I seriously don't understand what joy a publication get's out of publishing stuff like this especially with the current ME situation over the film.
Like are they TRYING to insight outrage and riots and people getting killed?
didn't the media learn its lesson after South Park made fun of Mohammed and someone nearly bombed Comedy Central HQ in times square with a failed truck bomb?
That said, the conspiracy theorist inside of me says this all smells AWFULLY fished and orchestrated to me... and wouldn't be surprised if this was part of a larger scale "planned" event.
Nothing should be 'off limits' to talk about, draw about, or think about. This is one of the many problems I have with religion. The entire 'my prophet and beliefs are more right than yours' has caused so much death and suffering in the world it's ridiculous.
So it causes outrage and and riots, that is no fault of the person/group who is sharing an idea. Whether it is supposed to be comedic or serious, bottom line is 'so what.'
You mention the South Park situation and all I can do is roll my eyes, not really at you, but about how it all played out. What do you mean people can't animate/draw/mention a certain prophet, no matter which one it is?
It's mind baffling to me that anyone would have these beliefs. So this prophet, in his almighty wisdom and greatness at one point said 'DON'T MAKE CARTOONS OR ANYTHING ABOUT ME OR ELSE," right...seems legit.
The Dutch filmmaker believed that insulting people was his right as a free citizen. The Muslim fanatic who slaughtered him didn't agree.
Muslims protested across the Islamic world, some of which escalated into violence with instances of police firing on crowds of protestors resulting in a total of more than 100 reported deaths including the bombing of the Danish embassy in Pakistan and setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming European buildings, and burning the Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, French and German flags in Gaza City
Last month postings on an Islamic website warned the creators of South Park - Matt Stone and Trey Parker - that they could face violent reprisals after an episode of the show featured Mohammed in a bear suit. A posting on the website of a US-based group called Revolution Muslim warned Stone and Parker that they would “probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh”, the Dutch film-maker who was murdered in 2004 by a Muslim angered by his film about Muslim women
Nothing spoken or printed, possibly short of a direct threat, should EVER provoke anyone to riot or kill. Anyone who lets themselves be provoked that way might as well just count themselves out of civilization.
Originally posted by AJ1123TKE
I seriously don't understand what joy a publication get's out of publishing stuff like this especially with the current ME situation over the film.
Like are they TRYING to insight outrage and riots and people getting killed?
Originally posted by LeSigh
Vive la France!
"Je déteste ce que vous écrivez, mais je donnerai ma vie pour que vous puissiez continuer à écrire." (I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write.) ~attributed to Voltaire
In 1996 Garaudy published his most controversial work, Les Mythes fondateurs de la politique israelienne, later translated into English as The Founding Myths of Modern Israel. Because the book contained Holocaust denial, French courts banned any further publication and on 27 February 1998 fined him 240,000 French francs. He was sentenced to a suspended jail sentence of several years.
en.wikipedia.org...
Faurisson was fined by a French court in 1983, for having declared that "Hitler never ordered nor permitted that anyone be killed by reason of his race or religion."[1][6][7]
Faurisson was charged again in a trial on 11 July 2006. He was accused of denying the Holocaust in an interview with the Iranian television station "Sahar 1" in February 2005. On 3 October 2006, he was given a three-month probationary sentence and fined €7,500 for this offence.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Abbby
reply to post by benrl
Bull. Just because I CAN say something, doesn't mean I SHOULD.
Originally posted by Abbby
reply to post by benrl
According to us courts.gov, "freedom of speech does not include:
-to incite actions that would harm others,
-to make or distribute obscene materials"