It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"My plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet, because climate change is not a hoax," he said, as he accepted his party's presidential nomination for the tight-fought election in November. "More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke," he said. "They are a threat to our children's future."
Legislation backed by Obama died in the US Senate in 2010 amid staunch opposition from Republicans, many of whom question scientists' view that carbon emissions are behind rising temperatures. Obama has urged Congress to renew tax credits for clean energy, with incentives for wind power set to expire at the end of 2012, and called for an end to subsidies to already profitable oil companies.
ENERGY: Obama said the country could cut oil imports in half by 2020, and support more than 600,000 jobs by expanding natural gas production in the United States, and investing in alternative energy sources, clean coal, biofuels, and more energy-efficient homes and buildings. He said his administration has raised fuel standards so cars and trucks will go farther on a gallon of gas; has made the country less dependent on foreign sources of oil; and opened up millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration.
Originally posted by MamaJ
.
The truth is ugly sometimes, but someone somewhere in charge needs to step up and do it quick!
So, what do you think ATS? What are your thoughts?
reply to post by Jeremiah65
The climate IS changing...as it has done over and over for millions of years. The only debate is if it natural, is man-made or if it is worsened by man. This is the debate...but sorry to burst your ignorance bubble...the climate is changing. There was a time several thousand years ago that the earth was covered in ice...called "snowball earth"...there was a time that the poles were lush with vegetation...the massive cycles of time are real and are repeating. I'm not going to say man has anything to do with it...but I will say it takes a complete dolt to think that changes are not happening right before our eyes.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by MamaJ
.
The truth is ugly sometimes, but someone somewhere in charge needs to step up and do it quick!
So, what do you think ATS? What are your thoughts?
You are wasting your time. Most people on ATS would argue with Jesus if he came down and said Global warming is real. They think everything is fine. Well, I don't have much hope for the future. It's looking like a combo of "The Road" and "Mad Max". Let it all burn, just don't take their oil.edit on 7-9-2012 by antonia because: opps
Originally posted by The0nlytruth
reply to post by MamaJ
I couldn't agree more with motivation.
I am not an american but I would indefinitely say that this is more lies by this man, politicians will do anything close to the election date to improve their chances in the election.
Nikola Tesla wanted free energy for all and had the intellectual ability to do just that, The reason this will never be addressed appropriately is simply one thing, Money.
The oil companies will never stop until they have bled our planet dry, Then they will scream for the scientists to come up with a solution. There was a solution once (Nikola Tesla), The greed of the TPTB denied us that very solution.
They have failed my generation.
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by MamaJ
Global warming is a hoax period. The eartth is warmed by only one source, the sun. The sun is hotter than usual, making the planet hotter than usual.
Seems easy enough to understand without the chicken little routine to me, I don't know how everyone else doesn't see it also.
If your burning up is it because your skin is trapping to much green house gasses? Or is it that your standing too close to the fire?
You do the math.
Now..... Let's fix it!
Originally posted by mwood
No, It's not a hoax.
It's happening and will get worse in the future. It has happened before on this planet and will happen again.
It's not human caused and is just a cycle the earth goes through.
The only human caused disaster is hat people want to take advantage of it and make money off the issue.
Another way for the richer to get richer
Originally posted by D.Wolf
reply to post by MamaJ
Now..... Let's fix it!
Fix what? What's the problem? Can't fix nothin if you don't know the problem.
So what problem to fix with what answer.
That's the debate for, to identify the problem and only then to come with an answer.
You want to have me pay into an answer because what.. you want me to believe?
Guess what, I don't do believing, I want science to identify, and I want that science to be solid. Rocksolid.
After that we may debate the answer.
The scientific consensus is clearly expressed in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Created in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environmental Programme, IPCC's purpose is to evaluate the state of climate science as a basis for informed policy action, primarily on the basis of peer-reviewed and published scientific literature (3). In its most recent assessment, IPCC states unequivocally that the consensus of scientific opinion is that Earth's climate is being affected by human activities: “Human activities … are modifying the concentration of atmospheric constituents … that absorb or scatter radiant energy. … [M]ost of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations” [p. 21 in (4)]. IPCC is not alone in its conclusions. In recent years, all major scientific bodies in the United States whose members' expertise bears directly on the matter have issued similar statements. For example, the National Academy of Sciences report, Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions, begins: “Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth's atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise” [p. 1 in (5)]. The report explicitly asks whether the IPCC assessment is a fair summary of professional scientific thinking, and answers yes: “The IPCC's conclusion that most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations accurately reflects the current thinking of the scientific community on this issue” [p. 3 in (5)]. Others agree. The American Meteorological Society (6), the American Geophysical Union (7), and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) all have issued statements in recent years concluding that the evidence for human modification of climate is compelling (8).
Originally posted by tkwasny
Lets just cut to the chase on this instead of slimy backdoor tactics using global warming as the proxy. The new world-wide monetary standard should go to the BTU, or some such universal energy unit. All things animate and inanimate, all matter and energy can be defined and thus quantified under energy units.
The big BUT is this also means every constitution or foundational document for every country in the world also is still in place just as before except any monetary references in those documents is accepted as to now mean energy monetary units. Not the dollar, not the Yen, not the gold standard, Energy cannot change and cannot be manipulated by back room unseen powers. There are conversion mathematics for everything with regards to energy that are absolute.
To "make more money" there is now incentive to discover new energy generation means. The more energy you can develop or provide, the "richer" you are. Some numb-nut with a hydo or wind generation capability can earn an "income" by selling and trading energy units.edit on 7-9-2012 by tkwasny because: Addition
Originally posted by Smack
Climate change? Well, Duh! But, carbon dioxide is not to blame. In fact, the Earth is starved for CO2 relative to the historical average. During the Cretaceous period it was 8-10 times higher. I await the inevitable spin.
Many details about climate interactions are not well understood, and there are ample grounds for continued research to provide a better basis for understanding climate dynamics. The question of what to do about climate change is also still open. But there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change. Climate scientists have repeatedly tried to make this clear. It is time for the rest of us to listen.